Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Ultrabook Dell Latitude 13 7370
Dell Latitude 13 7370 (Latitude Serie)
Processador
Intel Core m5-6Y57 2 x 1.1 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 515, Análises do: 900 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 20.19.15.4390
Memória
8 GB
, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866, soldada, sem slots
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Sharp LQ133M1, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB
peso
1.247 kg, Suprimento de energia: 271 g
Preço
2200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp LQ133M1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 261 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 240.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 261 cd/m²
Contraste: 1004:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.82 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
49.18% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
78.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 1920x1080, IPS | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 2560x1440, IPS | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 2560x1440, IPS | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 1920x1080, IPS | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 2304x1440, IPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | 28% | 28% | 25% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 52.2 | 66.7 28% | 67.9 30% | 67.9 30% | 66.8 28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 78.3 | 94.7 21% | 96.8 24% | 98 25% | 95.4 22% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.9 | 68.4 27% | 70 30% | 69.8 29% | 68 26% |
| Response Times | 21% | 15% | 17% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 ? | 44 ? 13% | 46.4 ? 8% | 42 ? 17% | 41.2 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.6 ? | 24 ? 29% | 26.4 ? 21% | 28 ? 17% | 30.4 ? 10% |
| PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 217 ? | |||
| Screen | 15% | 10% | 3% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle | 261 | 272 4% | 327 25% | 300 15% | 387 48% |
| Brightness | 241 | 268 11% | 316 31% | 280 16% | 358 49% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 95 12% | 87 2% | 87 2% | 88 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.35 -35% | 0.31 -19% | 0.47 -81% |
| Contrast | 1004 | 850 -15% | 934 -7% | 968 -4% | 823 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.61 39% | 4.39 -2% | 4.9 -14% | 1.6 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.66 | 6.43 26% | 7.27 16% | 8.91 -3% | 4 54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.82 | 3.31 43% | 4.69 19% | 6.69 -15% | 1 83% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6771 96% | 6360 102% | 7101 92% | 6487 100% | 6680 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 49.18 | 63 28% | 62.52 27% | 63 28% | 61.6 25% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 77.84 | 95 22% | 96.71 24% | 98 26% | 82.2 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
18% | 18% /
14% | 16% /
10% | 21% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -40% | 75% | -52% | -30% | |
| Seq Read | 1425 | 499.1 -65% | 1839 29% | 494.9 -65% | 1056 -26% |
| Seq Write | 889 | 294 -67% | 1190 34% | 431.9 -51% | 651 -27% |
| 4K Read | 35.72 | 30.43 -15% | 47.72 34% | 16.97 -52% | 16.4 -54% |
| 4K Write | 97.9 | 74.6 -24% | 126.6 29% | 65.6 -33% | 22.1 -77% |
| 4K-64 Read | 450.6 | 370.4 -18% | 1858 312% | 217.9 -52% | 509 13% |
| 4K-64 Write | 347.2 | 253.4 -27% | 344.3 -1% | 147.9 -57% | 283 -18% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 704 | 236.2 -66% | 1313 87% | 545 -23% |
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima:
386.9 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima:
879 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média:
754 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso:
0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão:
275.2 MB/s
Uso da CPU:
4.8 %
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4165 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3048 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3528 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4238 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6244 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1094 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 38931 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3481 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 509 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38 | 20.3 | 17.6 | 5.3 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 16.4 | 13.5 | 8.7 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 24.6 | 18.2 | 12.8 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.35 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso |  5 / 7.5 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
15.3 / 26.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 34 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 52 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 45.6 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 18% | -16% | -6% | 33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 588 | 942 60% | 530 -10% | ||
| H.264 | 391 | 510 30% | 339 -13% | 512 31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 367 | 429 17% | 309 -16% | 345 -6% | 501 37% |
| Load | 176 | 115 -35% | 131 -26% | 231 31% |
Pro
+ Chassi sofisticado e resistente
+ Portas modernas
+ Conexões sem fio velozes
+ Dispositivos de entrada precisos
+ Sólido desempenho de aplicativos
+ Baixa temperatura
+ Sem ventoinha
+ 3 anos de garantia
Contra
- Apenas 1 USB Type-A
- Controle automático de brilho e contraste
- Capacidade limitada de atualização
- Preço muito alto
Uma tela quase sem marcos, resfriamento passivo e portas Thunderbolt 3 – o Dell Latitude 13 7370 definitivamente se destaca entre a os enjoados portáteis empresariais convencionais. O Ultrabook não teme a muitos concorrentes em termos de mobilidade e qualidade, e convence com sua perfeita qualidade de construção, excelente estabilidade e dispositivos de entrada firmes. O desempenho da plataforma Core-m também é muito bom: Os picos de uso intenso são – pelo menos depois da atualização do BIOS – gerenciados tão bem quanto os rivais resfriados de forma ativa. As velocidades e o desempenho somente seriam afetados notoriamente sob uso intenso contínuo, mas este não deveria ser um problema comum durante nossas típicas tarefas de escritório.
Que o 7370 não tenha conseguido uma pontuação muito boa é principalmente por causa da tela. A Dell implementou um painel muito bom com uma poderosa iluminação de fundo, mas você nem sempre poderá utilizá-la devido aos ajustes automáticos de brilho e contraste. Um problema perturbante, mas ainda esperamos que outra atualização do BIOS resolva isso. Se este for o caso, somente o preço extremamente alto evitaria uma recomendação de compra não qualificada: Com um preço de cerca de 2200 Euros (~$2468), o Latitude 13 certamente não é uma barganha – inclusive um Apple MacBook 12 é algumas centenas de Euros mais barato.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Dell Latitude 13 7370
- 05/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Till Schönborn
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
