Breve Análise do Toshiba Portégé X20W (7600U, 512 GB)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 442 cd/m²
Contraste: 2009:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE LEN40E6 N125HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ WST KL.1200W.002 WST2216, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -36% | -3% | -18% | -6% | 13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.7 | 42.98 -37% | 65 -5% | 55.7 -19% | 65.2 -5% | 81.8 19% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.8 | 62.8 -35% | 96.5 0% | 82.7 -15% | 91 -6% | 98.3 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 44.55 -37% | 67 -5% | 56.9 -19% | 66.1 -6% | 82.2 17% |
| Response Times | 14% | 26% | 49% | 36% | 41% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 67 ? | 64 ? 4% | 46 ? 31% | 21 ? 69% | 45 ? 33% | 30 ? 55% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39 ? | 30 ? 23% | 31.2 ? 20% | 28 ? 28% | 24 ? 38% | 29 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | -33% | -3% | -31% | -6% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 442 | 371 -16% | 413 -7% | 391 -12% | 406 -8% | 316 -29% |
| Brightness | 410 | 335 -18% | 396 -3% | 367 -10% | 396 -3% | 307 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 84 -2% | 87 1% | 87 1% | 88 2% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.36 -64% | 0.56 -155% | 0.3 -36% | 0.29 -32% |
| Contrast | 2009 | 1279 -36% | 1147 -43% | 698 -65% | 1353 -33% | 1090 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.22 | 8.51 -63% | 3.09 41% | 6.96 -33% | 5.28 -1% | 3.91 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.84 | 20.43 -73% | 13.43 -13% | 9.83 17% | 7.9 33% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.88 | 9.23 -17% | 3.92 50% | 7.44 6% | 6.71 15% | 5.37 32% |
| Gamma | 2.51 88% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6756 96% | 6759 96% | 7333 89% | 8126 80% | 6532 100% | 7812 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 41 -36% | 61 -5% | 53 -17% | 59 -8% | 72 13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 62 -36% | 97 0% | 83 -14% | 91 -6% | 98 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-27% | 7% /
1% | 0% /
-18% | 8% /
-0% | 17% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 34 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3654 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4797 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 4% | -8% | 15% | 235% | -1% | |
| Read Seq | 469 | 468.9 0% | 666 42% | 496.6 6% | 2408 413% | 398.9 -15% |
| Write Seq | 277.3 | 297.3 7% | 154.2 -44% | 415.3 50% | 1702 514% | 402 45% |
| Read 512 | 404.4 | 397.9 -2% | 266.3 -34% | 335.9 -17% | 1301 222% | 303.1 -25% |
| Write 512 | 266.6 | 297.1 11% | 154.2 -42% | 384 44% | 1288 383% | 320.3 20% |
| Read 4k | 25.24 | 33.11 31% | 28.51 13% | 32.38 28% | 53.6 112% | 26.11 3% |
| Write 4k | 89.4 | 85.1 -5% | 101.5 14% | 81.8 -9% | 162.2 81% | 57.7 -35% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 322.5 | 398.3 24% | 368.3 14% | 296.3 -8% | 504 56% | 245.8 -24% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 208.1 | 136.6 -34% | 153.6 -26% | 260.3 25% | 420.8 102% | 253.8 22% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1690 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6277 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43 | 28 | 23.5 | 7.6 |
| Thief (2014) | 23 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 16 | 9.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.2 / 31.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.8 °C / 76.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+3.2 °C / 5.8 F).
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.44 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.8 / 6.7 Watt |
| Carga |
21.4 / 21.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -26% | -70% | -25% | -66% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.6 -6% | 4.4 -29% | 5.5 -62% | 3.5 -3% | 6.7 -97% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 6.3 -9% | 9 -55% | 9.8 -69% | 7.2 -24% | 10.3 -78% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.7 | 7.6 -13% | 10.7 -60% | 11.9 -78% | 7.9 -18% | 13.5 -101% |
| Load Average * | 21.4 | 27.2 -27% | 19.6 8% | 36.1 -69% | 29.6 -38% | 26 -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 21.6 | 22.8 -6% | 19.9 8% | 36.7 -70% | 30.8 -43% | 28.8 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -32% | -26% | -40% | -36% | -53% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1001 | 943 -6% | 899 -10% | 644 -36% | 713 -29% | 426 -57% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 719 | 346 -52% | 427 -41% | 291 -60% | 345 -52% | 223 -69% |
| Load | 150 | 92 -39% | 111 -26% | 115 -23% | 111 -26% | 102 -32% |
| H.264 | 206 |
Pro
Contra
A Toshiba faz um muito bom trabalho em muitos aspectos e cumpres com uma promessa trás outra. A mobilidade é mais que ideal graças ao baixo peso, a tela anti refletiva com um alto brilho, e as durações da bateria de 12 a 16 horas. As emissões que quase nem vale a pena mencionar são as seguintes: A pequena ventoinha é quase inaudível. A promessa de um verdadeiro poder de portátil com boa utilização do Turbo no menor conversível é mantida.
O chassi de magnésio pesa 1024 quilogramas, que é ainda menos que a especificação do fabricante de 1,1 kg. Por isso, o Portégé X20w é o aparelho mais leve em comparação com outros modelos 2-em-1 feitos sob o conceito do Surface Pro 4 (dock de teclado).
É inigualável em comparação com outros modelos de 360 graus. O ThinkPad Yoga 260 de 12,5 polegadas já pesa 1,3 quilogramas.
As companhias estarão interessadas no X20w dado que incorpora quase todas as opções de segurança que o mercado tem a oferecer - exceto pela SmartCard. TPM, leitor de digitais, câmera IR para Windows Hello, BIOS Toshiba, Active Management da Intel estão presentes. A caneta stylus AES está incluída, como pode se esperar, em vista do alto preço.
Finalmente, são os pequenos detalhes os que reduzem a avaliação: A resposta do teclado é um pouco fraca em nossa opinião. O Miix 720 estabelece os padrões aqui. A webcam pobre frustra as gravações do microfone de primeira linha. Embora a conectividade com as estações docking Thunderbolt 3 (modelos estacionários e modelos de viagem) seja proporcionada, o adaptador é necessário, mais uma vez para conectar um HDMI ou um DisplayPort. O aparelho não pode ser carregado simultaneamente nesses casos, dado que o monitor bloquearia a porta Type-C necessária para carregar.
Temos prazer em dar uma recomendação de compra para o Toshiba Portégé X20w-D-10R. O alto preço não caberá em todos os orçamentos, especialmente nesses dos usuários privados ou empresas unipessoais.
Podemos recomendar o Aspire Switch Alpha 12 sem ventoinha para todos os que estiverem procurando um aparelho livre de afogamentos e silencioso. No entanto, sua duração da bateria é comparativamente curta. Neste caso, o Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i5 com uma ventoinha é melhor. O Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA pode ser excluído devido à curta duração de sua bateria. O IdeaPad Miix 720-12IKB que estamos testando se afoga e é muito barulhento.
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
- 03/20/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Price comparison
