Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020: Portátil empresarial familiar com um novo adaptador de energia
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 (ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Memória
16 GB
, LPDDR3-2133, Dual-Channel, soldada
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE NE140FHM-N61, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB
, 441 GB livre
peso
1.082 kg, Suprimento de energia: 332 g
Preço
1550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.2 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2019 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 92.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 |
18.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE140FHM-N61 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 422 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 395.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1563:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 BOE NE140FHM-N61, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH AU Optronics B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 27% | 0% | 18% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.9 | 64.3 -7% | 98.8 43% | 66.1 -4% | 83 20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.6 | 94.1 3% | 99.9 9% | 95.3 4% | 99.7 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.1 | 65.5 -2% | 86.4 29% | 67.5 1% | 83.1 24% |
| Response Times | -30% | 1549% | -10% | -25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 64.8 ? | 70.8 ? -9% | 46 ? 29% | 62 ? 4% | 49.2 ? 24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 34.4 ? -13% | 32.4 ? -7% | 37.6 ? -24% | 32.2 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 2404 ? | 735 ? -69% | 113600 ? 4625% | 201.6 ? -92% | |
| Screen | 12% | 29% | 5% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 422 | 416.3 -1% | 512 21% | 289 -32% | 532 26% |
| Brightness | 395 | 400 1% | 491 24% | 286 -28% | 513 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 90 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.32 -19% | 0.16 41% | 0.41 -52% |
| Contrast | 1563 | 1436 -8% | 1600 2% | 1806 16% | 1298 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.69 43% | 1.7 64% | 4.7 -0% | 6.88 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10 | 4.95 50% | 3.4 66% | 8.7 13% | 12.65 -27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2 | 2.13 -7% | 1 50% | 1.3 35% | 2.52 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 2.9 55% | 1.9 70% | 6.4 -0% | 10.5 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.4 92% | 2.19 100% | 2.54 87% | 1.98 111% |
| CCT | 7106 91% | 6623 98% | 6817 95% | 5977 109% | 7394 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.5 | 60.1 1% | 77.4 30% | 61.2 3% | 74.1 25% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.5 | 94.5 3% | 99.9 9% | 95.1 4% | 99.7 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
2% | 535% /
297% | -2% /
2% | -7% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 34 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2404 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø594 (493.81-731.25)
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø525 (511.81-563.88)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Intel Core i5-1038NG7, Intel Core i5-1038NG7: Ø761 (725.23-768.15)
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH Intel Core i7-8665U, Intel Core i7-8665U: Ø544 (523.43-667.87)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø628 (486.69-776.19)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE Intel Core i7-8665U, Intel Core i7-8665U: Ø632 (574.56-701.36)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4251 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5447 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5296 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4527 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Apple SSD SM0512F | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | -39% | -12% | -1% | 2% | |
| Write 4K | 185 | 122.7 -34% | 28.16 -85% | 118.6 -36% | 151.5 -18% | 140.8 ? -24% |
| Read 4K | 50.6 | 46.57 -8% | 17.5 -65% | 44.68 -12% | 45.83 -9% | 48.6 ? -4% |
| Write Seq | 1543 | 1725 12% | 1195 -23% | 1866 21% | 2060 34% | 2106 ? 36% |
| Read Seq | 1509 | 2392 59% | 1470 -3% | 2173 44% | 1973 31% | 2099 ? 39% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 488.8 | 470.6 -4% | 205 -58% | 330.9 -32% | 489.8 0% | 451 ? -8% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 579 | 313.2 -46% | 692 20% | 343.1 -41% | 386.2 -33% | 482 ? -17% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2986 | 1869 -37% | 1475 -51% | 1927 -35% | 2703 -9% | 2903 ? -3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3555 | 3380 -5% | 1920 -46% | 3528 -1% | 3376 -5% | 3511 ? -1% |
| AS SSD | -24% | -127% | -31% | -49% | -21% | |
| Seq Read | 2659 | 1816 -32% | 1300 -51% | 2381 -10% | 1786 -33% | 2412 ? -9% |
| Seq Write | 2551 | 1270 -50% | 1518 -40% | 1290 -49% | 1259 -51% | 1983 ? -22% |
| 4K Read | 56.4 | 46.25 -18% | 14.09 -75% | 52 -8% | 45.86 -19% | 53.1 ? -6% |
| 4K Write | 158 | 104.1 -34% | 24.25 -85% | 134.8 -15% | 147.9 -6% | 131.1 ? -17% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1317 | 1342 2% | 725 -45% | 530 -60% | 885 -33% | 1201 ? -9% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1786 | 1209 -32% | 169.6 -91% | 1177 -34% | 950 -47% | 1726 ? -3% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.043 9% | 0.172 -266% | 0.05 -6% | 0.058 -23% | 0.05525 ? -18% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.024 | 0.035 -46% | 0.155 -546% | 0.032 -33% | 0.074 -208% | 0.05394 ? -125% |
| Score Read | 1640 | 1569 -4% | 869 -47% | 820 -50% | 1110 -32% | 1495 ? -9% |
| Score Write | 2199 | 1440 -35% | 346 -84% | 1441 -34% | 1224 -44% | 2055 ? -7% |
| Score Total | 4682 | 3790 -19% | 1667 -64% | 2652 -43% | 2885 -38% | 4303 ? -8% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2034 | 1719 | 1384 | 1894 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 450.3 | 499.6 | 525 | 539 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1024 | 1091 | 1008 | 1193 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-17% | -83% /
-90% | -22% /
-23% | -25% /
-29% | -10% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3555 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2986 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
488.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1509 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1543 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
50.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
185 MB/s
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2240 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 71820 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9816 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1239 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 497 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 18.2 | 12.1 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 85.8 | 49.6 | 23 | 20.2 | 7.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 13.9 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 6.59 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 16 | ||||
| F1 2019 (2019) | 30 | 12 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.6 / 33.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -6% | 0% | -2% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 28.3 4% | 29.6 -0% | 28.6 3% | 28.2 4% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 28.3 4% | 29.6 -0% | 28.6 3% | 28.2 4% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.5 | 28.3 4% | 29.6 -0% | 28.6 3% | 28.2 4% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 28.3 4% | 29.6 -0% | 29.1 1% | 29.4 -0% | 28.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 31.6 | 32.6 -3% | 34.4 -9% | 31.5 -0% | 31.5 -0% | 31.5 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.9 | 36.6 -8% | 42.1 -24% | 36.9 -9% | 41.2 -22% | 33.1 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.1 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.69 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.96 / 5.9 / 9.1 Watt |
| Carga |
42.1 / 65.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD SM0512F, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -22% | -6% | -31% | 0% | -21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.96 | 2.7 9% | 3.8 -28% | 3.9 -32% | 3.5 -18% | 3.81 ? -29% | 4.49 ? -52% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 6.5 -10% | 8.6 -46% | 6.1 -3% | 10.8 -83% | 6.94 ? -18% | 7.66 ? -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 11.5 -26% | 10.3 -13% | 8.2 10% | 12.5 -37% | 8.75 ? 4% | 9.56 ? -5% |
| Load Average * | 42.1 | 38.7 8% | 52.1 -24% | 41 3% | 47.2 -12% | 35 ? 17% | 46.6 ? -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.1 | 50.5 22% | 65.2 -0% | 69.7 -7% | 68.8 -6% | 47.5 ? 27% | 68.6 ? -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.2 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 58 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 50% | 5% | 25% | -1% | -13% | 19% | |
| H.264 | 770 | 687 -11% | 862 12% | 688 -11% | 896 ? 16% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 604 | 623 3% | 728 21% | 696 15% | 598 -1% | 562 -7% | 710 ? 18% |
| Load | 95 | 187 97% | 141 48% | 76 -20% | 116.6 ? 23% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 1673 | 1599 ? |
Pro
+ Extremamente compacto e leve
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Ventoinha mais silenciosa
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Alto-falantes muito bons
+ Opções abrangentes de garantia
+ Wi-Fi 6
+ Ainda um teclado muito bom...
Contra
- ...mas pior em comparação com outros ThinkPads
- Sem “WWAN ready”
- Loteria de paineis para as telas LowPower de 1080p
- Sem leitor SD
- Manutenção muito limitada
- LAN apenas via adaptador (incluído)
Veredicto - Pequenas atualizações sem benefícios reais
Depois que o ThinkPad X1 Carbon recebeu uma grande atualização no ano passado, os clientes só recebem uma pequena atualização desta vez. Algumas regiões já têm o processador Comet Lake na geração G7 de 2019; a 8ª geração do X1 Carbon agora usa novos processadores em todas as regiões. Entretanto, as diferenças em termos de processador, assim como o desempenho gráfico, são basicamente inexistentes e não justificam uma atualização. A única vantagem real é o novo módulo Wi-Fi 6.
Embora não haja grandes atualizações, o ThinkPad X1 Carbon ainda é um portátil empresarial muito bom com um chassi extremamente leve e robusto. Entretanto, ainda existem os mesmos problemas como a loteria para os painéis para as telas LowPower de 1080p. O teclado também é um pouco pior desde a atualização do chassi no ano passado. Esta é uma queixa de alto nível, mas o carro-chefe ThinkPad não oferece mais o melhor teclado; máquinas mais grossas (como a série T) têm uma vantagem a este respeito.
A Lenovo não usa processadores AMD para a série X1, portanto a mudança para a 8ª geração é apenas uma pequena atualização. Ainda é um portátil empresarial muito bom, mas o novo ThinkPad T14s da Lenovo (incluindo os SoCs AMD) poderia ser o maior concorrente.
Então vale a pena atualizar? As únicas vantagens reais em comparação com o modelo 2019 são o módulo Wi-Fi 6, bem como o adaptador de energia ligeiramente menor, mas isto dificilmente justifica uma atualização. Também estamos ansiosos para colocar nossas mãos nos novos ThinkPad T14s. Recebe um novo chassi e deve estar ainda mais próximo do X1 Carbon, mas a Lenovo também venderá modelos com CPUs AMD, além de SKUs Intel. Se olharmos para os primeiros resultados do ThinkPad E15 com a CPU AMD 4000 econômico, a AMD T14s deve oferecer muito mais desempenho do que o X1 Carbon.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00
-
07/01/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
