Breve Análise do Tablet Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10 (Pentium N4200, FHD)

Name: Xploretech XSLATE L10
Brand: Xploretech

Moderno e reforçado. Um tablet reforçado com todas as amenidades que se esperaria de um tablet de consumo e muito mais. O Xplore XSLATE L10 funciona com o mesmo processador dos últimos Ultrabooks com NFC, 4G LTE e até mesmo uma bateria removível e uma porta HDMI de tamanho normal.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/23/2018 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...

Business Tablet Windows

Test device courtesy of Xplore Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xploretech XSLATE L10

Processador

Intel Pentium N4200 4 x 1.1 - 2.5 GHz, Apollo Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 505, 24.20.100.6137

Memória

8 GB

, 1200 Hz, LPDDR3

Pantalha

10.10 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: não

Disco rígido

SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122, 256 GB

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro

Funcionamento em rede

Intel I210 Gigabit Network Connection (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, Sierra Wireless EM7565, LTE

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 280.8 x 195.2

Bateria

36 Wh, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2 MPSecondary Camera: 13 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Monaural, Teclado: Chiclet, 36 Meses Garantia, ruggedized

peso

1.3 kg, Suprimento de energia: 342 g

Links

Xploretech página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Dell Latitude 3490 Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 Xploretech XSLATE L10 Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 DIN A4 ❌

Right: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, Up-Down rocker, Screen lock, Power button, HDMI (exposed)

Left: MicroSD reader, USB Type-C + mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	142.6 MB/s +126%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	136.2 MB/s +116%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	63.1 MB/s
Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.6 MB/s -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	239 MB/s +168%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	237.5 MB/s +167%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.1 MB/s
Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.4 MB/s -73%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	670 MBit/s +106%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	661 MBit/s +103%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	497 MBit/s +53%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	325 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	664 MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	528 MBit/s -20%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	514 MBit/s -23%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	492 MBit/s -26%


1084.3 cd/m²	1108.5 cd/m²	1164.2 cd/m²
1069.8 cd/m²	1145.9 cd/m²	1129.4 cd/m²
1028.8 cd/m²	1044.5 cd/m²	1034.7 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 1164.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 1090 cd/m² Minimum: 8.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 1145.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1014:1 (Preto: 1.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 5.06
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
45.72% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Xploretech XSLATE L10 IPS, 10.1", 1920x1200	Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 IPS, 10.5", 2224x1668	Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Sharp SHP1417 LQ116K1, TN, 11.6", 1366x768	Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Sharp LQ140K1, IPS, 14", 1366x768	Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 Semi-Matte Beschichtung, IPS LED, 12", 2160x1440	Dell Latitude 3490 LP140WF6 / LGD059D, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080
Display			-21%	-19%	2%	-13%
Display P3 Coverage	45.72		36.06 -21%	37.22 -19%	46.47 2%	39.81 -13%
sRGB Coverage	68.1		54 -21%	55.8 -18%	70 3%	59.6 -12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	47.29		37.29 -21%	38.49 -19%	48.01 2%	41.16 -13%
Response Times		-5%		-22%	59%	-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32.8 ?(17.6, 15.2)	39.6 ?(19.2, 20.4) -21%		43 ?(20, 23) -31%	39 ?(21, 18) -19%	36.4 ?(18.8, 17.6) -11%
Response Time Black / White *	20 ?(10.8, 9.2)	17.6 ?(6, 11.6) 12%		27 ?(17, 10) -35%	30 ?(18, 12) -50%	24 ?(13.2, 10.8) -20%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(99)			200 ?(20) 0%	694 ?(90) 247%
Screen		27%	-37%	-36%	3%	-8%
Brightness middle	1145.9	634 -45%	632 -45%	493 -57%	565 -51%	250 -78%
Brightness	1090	625 -43%	613 -44%	456 -58%	538 -51%	241 -78%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	90 2%	81 -8%	82 -7%	81 -8%
Black Level *	1.13	0.39 65%	0.47 58%	0.53 53%	0.4 65%	0.25 78%
Contrast	1014	1626 60%	1345 33%	930 -8%	1413 39%	1000 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.14	1.9 63%	11.22 -118%	11.08 -116%	5.06 2%	5.5 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	23.66	3.9 84%		15.11 36%	8.1 66%	23.5 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	5.06					4.8 5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.4	2.8 36%	12.19 -177%	11.99 -173%	6.4 -45%	3.5 20%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	3.4 ^65%	4.03 ^55%	2.25 ^98%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6847 ^95%	7027 ^93%	1256 ^518%	10872 ^60%	5794 ^112%	7049 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42.8		35 -18%	36 -16%	44 3%	37.9 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	67.2		54 -20%	56 -17%	70 4%	59.4 -12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 21%	-29% / -33%	-26% / -30%	21% / 13%	-12% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.6 ms rise
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490 Intel Core i7-8650U	178 Points +279%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	168 Points +257%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points +204%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	96 Points +104%
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	77 Points +64%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	73 Points +55%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	62 Points +32%
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (47 - 53, n=15)	51.7 Points +10%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel Pentium N4200	47 Points
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	38 Points -19%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	27 Points -43%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Intel Core i5-8250U	716 Points +411%
Dell Latitude 5490 Intel Core i7-8650U	661 Points +372%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	655 Points +368%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	236 Points +69%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	228 Points +63%
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (128 - 178, n=15)	157.2 Points +12%
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	144 Points +3%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel Pentium N4200	140 Points
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	124 Points -11%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	118 Points -16%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points -33%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490 Intel Core i7-8650U	2.04 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	1.94 Points
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	1.13 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	0.94 Points
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	0.85 Points
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	0.66 Points
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (0.64 - 0.66, n=3)	0.65 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	0.35 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490 Intel Core i7-8650U	6.97 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	6.11 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	2.8 Points
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	2.48 Points
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (2.02 - 2.27, n=3)	2.13 Points
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	1.57 Points
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	1.39 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	1.17 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	7614 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	6610 Points
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (4673 - 5440, n=8)	5132 Points
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	4909 Points
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	3500 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2911 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M Intel Core i5-4200U	3712 Points
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel Core M-5Y71	2341 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	2287 Points
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	2085 Points
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (1630 - 1680, n=8)	1655 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	948 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel Celeron J4005	1042 s *
Average Intel Pentium N4200 (704 - 724, n=2)	714 s *
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	645 s *
Dell Latitude 5490 Intel Core i7-8650U	334.6 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

47 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

140 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

13.09 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2	4458 Points +233%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3655 Points +173%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3386 Points +153%
Intel NUC7CJYH UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4005, SanDisk Ultra II	2084 Points +56%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122	1337 Points
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1139 Points -15%

PCMark 10 - Score
Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2	3619 Points +167%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3226 Points +138%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122	1355 Points
Intel NUC7CJYH UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4005, SanDisk Ultra II	1136 Points -16%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1337 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		1355 pontos
Ajuda

	Xploretech XSLATE L10 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122	Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280	Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Liteonit CV3-8D128	Dell Latitude 3490 SK hynix SC311 M.2	Intel NUC7CJYH SanDisk Ultra II
AS SSD		-8%	9%	53%	9%
Copy Game MB/s	151.1	158.6 5%	168.6 12%	306.2 103%	175.5 16%
Copy Program MB/s	80.2	101.7 27%	115.4 44%	315.9 294%	102 27%
Copy ISO MB/s	275.9	164.8 -40%	302.4 10%	476.7 73%	197 -29%
Score Total	1362	643 -53%	762 -44%	1006 -26%	1025 -25%
Score Write	240	164 -32%	226 -6%	387 61%	268 12%
Score Read	746	323 -57%	349 -53%	409 -45%	498 -33%
Access Time Write *	0.119	0.095 20%	0.069 42%	0.052 56%	0.089 25%
Access Time Read *	0.154	0.091 41%	0.121 21%	0.097 37%	0.115 25%
4K-64 Write	170.1	85.8 -50%	124.7 -27%	286.1 68%	174.6 3%
4K-64 Read	683	246.6 -64%	267.5 -61%	332.7 -51%	420.5 -38%
4K Write	34.04	64.5 89%	54.7 61%	68.9 102%	47.43 39%
4K Read	16.17	25.41 57%	29.92 85%	27.67 71%	26.98 67%
Seq Write	362	139.3 -62%	464.4 28%	318.8 -12%	464.8 28%
Seq Read	466	513 10%	516 11%	484.7 4%	480 3%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 554 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 524 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 107.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 73 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 434.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 415.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.32 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 52.5 MB/s

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	2802 Points +439%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1634 Points +214%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U	1369 Points +163%
Average Intel HD Graphics 505 (424 - 825, n=16)	632 Points +22%
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4005	579 Points +11%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71	529 Points +2%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200	520 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	342 Points -34%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795	191 Points -63%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	2756 Points +471%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1326 Points +175%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U	1239 Points +157%
Intel NUC7CJYH Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4005	593 Points +23%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71	569 Points +18%
Average Intel HD Graphics 505 (308 - 754, n=16)	556 Points +15%
Xploretech XSLATE L10 Intel HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200	483 Points
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	361 Points -25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795	196 Points -59%

3DMark 11 Performance		577 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	21.3	10.2

Barulho

Ocioso		27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB
Carga		27.8 / 29.9 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)

	Xploretech XSLATE L10 HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122	Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280	Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
Noise		-22%	-9%	-11%	-20%
off / environment *	27.8		30.2 -9%	30.5 -10%	29.8 -7%
Idle Minimum *	27.8	31 -12%	30.2 -9%	30.5 -10%	29.8 -7%
Idle Average *	27.8	31 -12%	30.2 -9%	30.5 -10%	29.8 -7%
Idle Maximum *	27.8	31 -12%	30.2 -9%	30.5 -10%	29.8 -7%
Load Average *	27.8	39.6 -42%	30.2 -9%	31.9 -15%	39.1 -41%
Load Maximum *	29.9	39.9 -33%	31.7 -6%	32.6 -9%	44.3 -48%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.6 °C	33.2 °C	32.4 °C
35.4 °C	35.6 °C	33.8 °C
36.8 °C	38.8 °C	35.2 °C

Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 35 °C


33 °C	36 °C	31.6 °C
40.8 °C	39.8 °C	39 °C
35.2 °C	41.2 °C	37.8 °C

Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 37.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.39 / 1.5 Watt
Ocioso	3.7 / 10.7 / 11 Watt
Carga	17.8 / 17.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xploretech XSLATE L10 Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5"	Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet 5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280, TN, 1366x768, 11.6"	Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 12"	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12"
Power Consumption		48%	8%	11%	-64%	20%
Idle Minimum *	3.7	1.44 61%	3.8 -3%	3.15 15%	3.2 14%	2 46%
Idle Average *	10.7	6.12 43%	9.3 13%	6 44%	5.5 49%	5.4 50%
Idle Maximum *	11	6.14 44%	9.7 12%	6.3 43%	8.1 26%	6.6 40%
Load Average *	17.8	8.55 52%	16.3 8%	21 -18%	40.8 -129%	22 -24%
Load Maximum *	17.9	10.62 41%	15.9 11%	23 -28%	68.1 -280%	20 -12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing		7h 11min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 36min

	Xploretech XSLATE L10 Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh	Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, 30.8 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet 5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, 56 Wh	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh	Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 97 Wh
Battery Runtime		45%	9%	61%	-42%	46%
WiFi v1.3	431	693 61%	471 9%	694 61%	252 -42%	628 46%
Load	156	199 28%
Reader / Idle		2036

Pro

+ Muitas opções de conectividade, incluindo cartão inteligente, HDMI, 4G LTE e NFC

+ Tela muito brilhante; excelente visibilidade em exteriores

+ Bateria secundaria protuberante

+ Design forte e reforçado

+ Câmera frontal e traseira

+ SSD M.2 atualizável

+ Ruído baixo da ventoinha

Contra

- Reprodução pobre de graves; alto-falante poderia ser mais potente

- Cores imprecisas; espaço de cor limitado

- HDMI está escondido atrás de parafusos inconvenientes

- Stylus WACOM pequeno; deslocamento curto

- Desempenho médio da câmera com pouca luz

- Bleeding moderado a pesado da iluminação de fundo

- Desempenho gráfico fraco

- Sem carregamento via USB Tipo C

- O Pentium N4200 é lento

In review: Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10. Test unit provided by Xplore

O L10 é focado para fornecer a melhor experiência para usuários industriais e atinge a marca. A precisão das cores, a reprodução de graves, o bleeding da luz de fundo e o desempenho gráfico são, na melhor das hipóteses, ruins ou medianos. Felizmente para o público-alvo, essas desvantagens provavelmente terão um impacto mínimo nas cargas de trabalho do dia-a-dia e provavelmente não serão prejudiciais. Em vez disso, é a rigidez, a conectividade e o brilho da tela que importam, e o L10 definitivamente cumpre nessa frente.

Há alguns detalhes que esperamos que a Xplore possa resolver em futuras revisões. Primeiro, o adaptador de CA proprietário é inconveniente quando o carregamento universal via USB tipo C está agora disponível na maioria dos portáteis e tablets. Em segundo lugar, o digitalizador da WACOM é muito pequeno e estreito para segurar confortavelmente quando comparado aos concorrentes. Em terceiro lugar, o volume máximo poderia ter sido mais alto para o trabalho em exteriores ou em ambientes industriais. Só podemos esperar que os nossos resultados de WiFi inconsistentes sejam específicos da nossa unidade e não sejam generalizados.

Um tablet industrial muito brilhante e versátil com quase todos os recursos de um tablet de consumo convencional. Se visibilidade ao ar livre é de extrema preocupação, então este é o tablet indicado. Alguns aborrecimentos de design menores significam muito espaço para melhorias em revisões futuras.

Xploretech XSLATE L10 - 2018-07-15 07/15/2018 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

94%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

67 / 65 → 100%

Peso

71 / 40-88 → 65%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

41 / 68 → 60%

Desempenho da aplicação

45 / 76 → 59%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

99%

Audio

30 / 91 → 33%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Médio

70%

79%

Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10 (Pentium N4200, FHD)

Allen Ngo, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-08- 1)