Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S6: Tecnologia de ponta a um preço premium
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple iPad 7 2019 A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU | 483 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU | 468 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8 | 498 g | 7.3 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
87.5 % v6 (old) | 08/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8 | 498 g | 7.3 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 SD 670, Adreno 616 | 400 g | 5.5 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 86 %
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Apple iPad 7 2019 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 34% | 39% | -17% | -97% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 446 | 499 12% | 639 43% | 382 -14% | 384 -14% | 452 1% |
Brightness | 445 | 470 6% | 591 33% | 378 -15% | 360 -19% | 453 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 87 1% | 92 7% | 84 -2% | 90 5% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.8 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 0.97 64% | 0.92 66% | 2.8 -4% | 6.83 -153% | 1.7 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.4 | 1.98 63% | 2.59 52% | 6 -11% | 12.7 -135% | 3.7 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 0.9 57% | 1.3 38% | 3.5 -67% | 7.5 -257% | 2.4 -14% |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.135 103% | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.199 100% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 6468 100% | 6571 99% | 6656 98% | 6903 94% | 8544 76% | 6337 103% |
Contrast | 1018 | 1420 | 1592 | 480 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.7 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (84.4 - 120, n=17) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -40% | -48% | -45% | 5% | 4% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1416 | 247.8 -82% | 278.6 -80% | 294.4 -79% | 1520 ? 7% | 1045 ? -26% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 522 | 126.8 -76% | 94.1 -82% | 197.1 -62% | 546 ? 5% | 686 ? 31% |
Random Read 4KB | 191.6 | 54.7 -71% | 27.41 -86% | 79.2 -59% | 206 ? 8% | 189.4 ? -1% |
Random Write 4KB | 170.2 | 60.8 -64% | 15.35 -91% | 18.79 -89% | 193.9 ? 14% | 189.9 ? 12% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 70.5 ? | 85.1 ? 21% | 84.9 ? 20% | 76.1 ? 8% | 67.3 ? -5% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 54.5 ? | 73.8 ? 35% | 73.1 ? 34% | 60.8 ? 12% | 55.7 ? 2% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (110.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.18 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.96 / 2.8 / 2.82 Watt |
Carga |
5.31 / 11.91 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -92% | -71% | -49% | -76% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.96 | 2.2 -12% | 1.2 39% | 2.01 -3% | 3.3 -68% | 2.07 -6% |
Idle Average * | 2.8 | 6.7 -139% | 4.1 -46% | 5.4 -93% | 4.2 -50% | 3.94 -41% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.82 | 8.2 -191% | 7.5 -166% | 5.44 -93% | 7 -148% | 3.96 -40% |
Load Average * | 5.31 | 11.3 -113% | 13.6 -156% | 8.55 -61% | 10.4 -96% | 4.07 23% |
Load Maximum * | 11.91 | 12.5 -5% | 15.2 -28% | 11.53 3% | 13.8 -16% | 5.73 52% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 25% | -10% | -11% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1276 | 1486 16% | 2056 61% | 1344 5% | 1254 -2% | 1263 -1% |
H.264 | 872 | 802 -8% | 982 13% | 702 -19% | 629 -28% | 864 -1% |
WiFi v1.3 | 556 | 707 27% | 920 65% | 648 17% | 670 21% | 623 12% |
Load | 340 | 196 -42% | 208 -39% | 196 -42% | 220 -35% | 300 -12% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict - Top technology at a steep price
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 provavelmente é o melhor tablet Android da atualidade. Com seu SoC Snapdragon-855, o tablet de 10,5 polegadas deixa concorrentes ainda mais rápidos, como o Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro para trás. Também ganha pontos com uma brilhante tela AMOLED0, acabamento de alta qualidade e um poderoso som surround de quatro alto-falantes.
As vantagens adicionais do Galaxy Tab S6 são a boa duração da bateria, a câmera dupla decente, pelo menos em condições de luz do dia, e, por último, mas não menos importante, a S Pen incluída que adiciona entrada de caneta muito prática ao tablet. O modo de desktop DeX da Samsung também merece uma menção, mas para realmente poder trabalhar com isso, você precisa do teclado de acoplamento opcional, que aumenta o preço total em cerca de 130 Euros (~ US$ 145).
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 é ideal para uso criativo e multimídia. No entanto, o Galaxy Tab S5e é quase tão bom quanto isso, por apenas metade do preço.
Isso também nos leva à principal desvantagem do tablet carro-chefe da Samsung: o preço oficial de pelo menos 749 Euros (~ US$ 836). Se não precisar do desempenho máximo, o Galaxy Tab S5e vai se sair igual de bem. Custa apenas a metade, mas já oferece desempenho mais que suficiente para todas as tarefas diárias. Seu equipamento também é em grande parte idêntico ao do Galaxy Tab S6.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero