Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 452 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -69% | -2% | -34% | -131% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 452 | 426 -6% | 515 14% | 382 -15% | 522 15% | 474 5% |
| Brightness | 453 | 399 -12% | 483 7% | 378 -17% | 495 9% | 477 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 90 0% | 92 2% | 84 -7% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.41 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.5 -165% | 1.6 6% | 2.8 -65% | 6.7 -294% | 2.5 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 7.9 -114% | 4.4 -19% | 6 -62% | 12.2 -230% | 5.8 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 5.2 -117% | 2.8 -17% | 3.5 -46% | 9.1 -279% | 2.1 12% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.14 103% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 6337 103% | 6875 95% | 6944 94% | 6903 94% | 9417 69% | 6281 103% |
| Contrast | 1121 | 1256 | 1592 | 1273 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Vulkan Medium Native | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| VRMark - Amber Room | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Lenovo Tab P10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -38% | 29% | -7% | 44% | 4% | 388% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 294.4 | 262.2 -11% | 247.8 -16% | 276.7 -6% | 741 152% | 274 ? -7% | 1045 ? 255% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 197.1 | 147.7 -25% | 126.8 -36% | 205.7 4% | 195.8 -1% | 176.2 ? -11% | 684 ? 247% |
| Random Read 4KB | 79.2 | 27.72 -65% | 54.7 -31% | 53.9 -32% | 142 79% | 59.4 ? -25% | 189.2 ? 139% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.79 | 9.37 -50% | 60.8 224% | 15.75 -16% | 24.43 30% | 32 ? 70% | 189.5 ? 909% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.1 ? | 55.5 ? -27% | 85.1 ? 12% | 84.3 ? 11% | 80.1 ? 5% | 77.4 ? 2% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.8 ? | 30.14 ? -50% | 73.8 ? 21% | 61 ? 0% | 59.1 ? -3% | 58.3 ? -4% |
PUBG Mobile
Dead Trigger 2
Shadow Fight 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.37 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.07 / 3.94 / 3.96 Watt |
| Carga |
4.07 / 5.73 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -26% | -60% | -56% | -3% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.07 | 1.55 25% | 2.18 -5% | 2.01 3% | 1.01 51% | 1.76 15% |
| Idle Average * | 3.94 | 4.17 -6% | 6.4 -62% | 5.4 -37% | 4.16 -6% | 4.22 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.96 | 4.25 -7% | 6.43 -62% | 5.44 -37% | 4.17 -5% | 4.25 -7% |
| Load Average * | 4.07 | 7.13 -75% | 7.48 -84% | 8.55 -110% | 5.45 -34% | 4.52 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.73 | 9.63 -68% | 10.65 -86% | 11.53 -101% | 6.9 -20% | 7.35 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -3% | -11% | 16% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1263 | 960 -24% | 1501 19% | 1344 6% | 1315 4% | 1227 -3% |
| H.264 | 864 | 585 -32% | 684 -21% | 702 -19% | 910 5% | 735 -15% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 623 | 542 -13% | 738 18% | 648 4% | 992 59% | 495 -21% |
| Load | 300 | 274 -9% | 214 -29% | 196 -35% | 289 -4% | 245 -18% |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e é um tablet sólido e versátil. O dispositivo possui uma tela Super AMOLED de 10,5 polegadas, brilhante e rica em contraste, e um SoC capaz de suportar até os mais complexos jogos modernos. Da mesma forma, seus alto-falantes proporcionam uma experiência imersiva nos jogos, enquanto a duração da bateria não faltará durante longas sessões de jogos ou filmes.
O tablet também é bem construído e leve, o que nem sempre é o caso dos tablets de tamanho médio. O design de metal e os marcos finos da tela fazem com que pareça mais caro do que é. Além disso, a inclusão do suporte ao DeX e a capa de teclado opcional tornam o Tab S5e mais do que apenas um tablet multimídia.
Existem alguns pontos fracos, mas estes são poucos e distantes entre si. A Samsung equipou o tablet com câmeras comuns, enquanto a omissão de um chip NFC é decepcionante. Também recomendamos experimentar o Tab S5e em pessoa, se você for sensível ao PWM, pois a tela pisca em uma frequência que pode causar cansaço visual e dores de cabeça durante o uso prolongado.
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e é uma alternativa valiosa para tablets mais caros, como o Tab S4 e iPad Air (2019). Ele oferece praticamente tudo o que a maioria das pessoas desejaria de um tablet, mas a um preço mais acessível e sem muitos compromissos.
No geral, o Tab S5e não é apenas um dos tablets de melhor valor que você pode comprar atualmente, mas também dá uma boa batalha aos tablets mais poderosos. O Tab S4, no geral, continua a ser um melhor tablet multimídia, por causa de seu SoC mais poderoso, RAM de alta capacidade e armazenamento interno mais rápido. A inclusão do suporte para a caneta também ajuda o Tab S4.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
