Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro (LTE, SM-T545): Especialista em ambientes externos com bateria substituível
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 SD 670, Adreno 616 | 653 g | 9.9 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple iPad 7 2019 A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU | 483 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F SD 439, Adreno 505 | 580 g | 23 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81.3 % v6 (old) | 01/2018 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1 | 512 g | 13 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Notebookcheck-Maskottchen (Szene 1)Schloss (Szene 2)Schloss-Ansicht bei 5-fachem Zoom (Szene 3)Lowlight-Umgebung (Szene 4)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 601 cd/m²
Contraste: 897:1 (Preto: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Apple iPad 7 2019 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | -5% | -9% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 601 | 499 -17% | 392 -35% | 509 -15% | 503 -16% |
| Brightness | 554 | 470 -15% | 359 -35% | 477 -14% | 477 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 88 1% | 91 5% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.49 27% | 0.36 46% | 0.48 28% | 0.29 57% |
| Contrast | 897 | 1018 13% | 1089 21% | 1060 18% | 1734 93% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 0.97 56% | 2.7 -23% | 3.45 -57% | 4.4 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 1.98 64% | 5.4 2% | 5.17 6% | 10.4 -89% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 0.9 72% | 3.8 -19% | 4.5 -41% | 7.5 -134% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.135 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7129 91% | 6571 99% | 7276 89% | 7171 91% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 61350 Hz | ≤ 36 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 61350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 36 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 61350 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (189340 - 190804, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (49.1 - 57.6, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 3% | -33% | 182% | 5% | 391% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 294.5 | 295.6 0% | 218.1 -26% | 483.7 64% | 274 ? -7% | 1045 ? 255% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 207.5 | 238.9 15% | 54 -74% | 219.3 6% | 176.6 ? -15% | 686 ? 231% |
| Random Read 4KB | 71.2 | 64.8 -9% | 25.96 -64% | 119.8 68% | 59.4 ? -17% | 189.4 ? 166% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.75 | 16.76 -11% | 10.98 -41% | 195.8 944% | 32.2 ? 72% | 189.9 ? 913% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.9 ? | 86.5 ? 14% | 78.6 4% | 78.3 ? 3% | 77.4 ? 2% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.6 ? | 65.4 ? 8% | 64.3 6% | 65.3 ? 8% | 58.3 ? -4% |
Asphalt 9: Legends & PUBG Mobile
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 7 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.34 / 4.43 / 4.52 Watt |
| Carga |
5.91 / 7.91 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 7600 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -69% | 3% | 31% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.34 | 2.2 -64% | 1.28 4% | 0.89 34% | 1.21 10% |
| Idle Average * | 4.43 | 6.7 -51% | 4.5 -2% | 3.13 29% | 4.24 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.52 | 8.2 -81% | 4.59 -2% | 3.36 26% | 4.34 4% |
| Load Average * | 5.91 | 11.3 -91% | 5.71 3% | 3.93 34% | 6.99 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.91 | 12.5 -58% | 6.99 12% | 5.45 31% | 8.79 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 7600 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -24% | -30% | -21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2693 | 1486 -45% | 2083 -23% | 1357 -50% | 2120 -21% |
| H.264 | 1230 | 802 -35% | 919 -25% | 493 -60% | 950 -23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 990 | 707 -29% | 795 -20% | 895 -10% | 792 -20% |
| Load | 388 | 196 -49% | 288 -26% | 396 2% | 309 -20% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - tablet de uso especial bom, mas caro
O Samsung Galaxy Active Pro pode não ser o tablet mais bonito com sua carcaça grossa e robusta - mas essa nunca foi a intenção deste Android robusto. Este dispositivo floresce em áreas onde outros tablets não se saem bem - em condições desafiadoras de uso.
Se você estiver procurando por um tablet para uso em exteriores, verá que o Galaxy Tab Active Pro é um companheiro confiável e duradouro. A bateria trocável adiciona outro recurso bastante exclusivo ao pacote. A Samsung também incluiu uma S Pen, o que é justo o suficiente, considerando o alto preço de US$ 690 para a versão LTE. A versão Wi-Fi não é muito mais barata por US$ 600.
O Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro é um companheiro resistente, com muitos recursos excelentes. Infelizmente, também é bastante caro.
Atualmente, o tablet roda Android 9, mas deve receber uma atualização para o Android 10 em setembro de 2020. A Samsung também prometeu atualizações de software por quatro anos, tanto para as versões Wi-Fi quanto LTE, contadas desde o lançamento do produto em outubro de 2019.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
- 06/12/2020 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
