Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 (SM-T590N)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 556 cd/m²
Contraste: 1324:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Medion Lifetab P10606 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -177% | -52% | -60% | -185% | -57% | |
| Brightness middle | 556 | 340 -39% | 392 -29% | 426 -23% | 326 -41% | 542 -3% |
| Brightness | 514 | 320 -38% | 383 -25% | 399 -22% | 338 -34% | 520 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 84 -3% | 81 -7% | 91 5% | 92 6% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.19 55% | 0.25 40% | 0.38 10% | 0.56 -33% | 0.68 -62% |
| Contrast | 1324 | 1789 35% | 1568 18% | 1121 -15% | 582 -56% | 797 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 15 -733% | 4.2 -133% | 4.5 -150% | 9.1 -406% | 4.2 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 22.8 -613% | 11.2 -250% | 7.9 -147% | 18.2 -469% | 6.7 -109% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 4 -82% | 2.9 -32% | 5.2 -136% | 12 -445% | 4.8 -118% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.09 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6819 95% | 6940 94% | 7115 91% | 6875 95% | 11359 57% | 7434 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=13) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=13) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=13) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60) | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60) | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60) | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59) | |
| Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Medion Lifetab P10606 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -29% | -41% | -23% | -15% | -33% | -2% | 579% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 285.6 | 173.7 -39% | 216 -24% | 262.2 -8% | 274.7 -4% | 215.8 -24% | 242 ? -15% | 1045 ? 266% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 103.3 | 92.4 -11% | 66 -36% | 147.7 43% | 74.2 -28% | 45.88 -56% | 100.5 ? -3% | 686 ? 564% |
| Random Read 4KB | 71.1 | 13.7 -81% | 23 -68% | 27.72 -61% | 34.59 -51% | 23.46 -67% | 43.2 ? -39% | 189.4 ? 166% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.39 | 8.77 -35% | 9.8 -27% | 9.37 -30% | 12.02 -10% | 10.01 -25% | 22.4 ? 67% | 189.9 ? 1318% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.6 ? | 80.4 ? 0% | 40.9 -49% | 55.5 ? -31% | 79.6 ? -1% | 75.5 ? -6% | 71.8 ? -11% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.4 ? | 56.8 ? -6% | 34.9 -42% | 30.14 ? -50% | 64.9 ? 7% | 50.1 ? -17% | 52.9 ? -12% |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 50 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Balanced | 26 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.28 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.26 / 4.22 / 4.29 Watt |
| Carga |
5.48 / 6.57 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10606 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -74% | 22% | -20% | -31% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.26 | 3.21 -155% | 0.76 40% | 1.55 -23% | 1.4 -11% | 1.18 6% |
| Idle Average * | 4.22 | 5.97 -41% | 3.23 23% | 4.17 1% | 4.17 1% | 4.65 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.29 | 6.19 -44% | 3.35 22% | 4.25 1% | 4.2 2% | 4.74 -10% |
| Load Average * | 5.48 | 9.72 -77% | 4.79 13% | 7.13 -30% | 7.5 -37% | 5.75 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.57 | 9.97 -52% | 5.72 13% | 9.63 -47% | 13.71 -109% | 6.97 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10606 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -59% | -35% | -40% | -12% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1960 | 735 -62% | 1321 -33% | 960 -51% | 1506 -23% | 2634 34% |
| H.264 | 963 | 622 -35% | 585 -39% | 660 -31% | 893 -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 938 | 387 -59% | 467 -50% | 542 -42% | 796 -15% | 826 -12% |
| Load | 385 | 175 -55% | 302 -22% | 274 -29% | 463 20% | 428 11% |
Pro
Contra
O Galaxy Tab A 10.5 é um ótimo tablet de gama média da Samsung. A versão Wi-Fi está disponível por um preço online de cerca de $330 no momento da redação e oferece uma tela colorida de 10,5 polegadas com resolução de 1920x1200. Pode ser descrito como um companheiro de viagem duradouro que oferece desempenho suficiente para o uso diário. Se você está sempre em movimento, você pode querer considerar a versão LTE do Galaxy Tab A 10.5. Por favor, note que a versão LTE não está disponível nos EUA no momento da redação.
Uma atualização bem sucedida: O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 é um bom tablet multimídia que tem muito a oferecer, considerando sua faixa de preço.
O tablet pode ser facilmente usado para jogos, contanto que os usuários possam aceitar baixar um pouco os detalhes gráficos quando necessário. Os alto-falantes Dolby Atmos compensam essa fraqueza oferecendo um ótimo som. O modo kids opcional torna o tablet da Samsung adequado para ser usado como um tablet de família.
Existem apenas alguns pontos de crítica para este tablet. O mais importante é o fato de que a câmera só pode ser usada para fotos ocasionais, embora a qualidade ainda seja suficiente para chats de vídeo e selfies O Galaxy Tab A 10.5 não inclui um leitor de digitais, mas suporta identificação via reconhecimento facial. Nós esperávamos por correções de segurança mais regulares do Android.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
