Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Brand: Samsung

Rejuvenescimento -

Já faz mais de dois anos que a Samsung atualizou seu tablet Galaxy Tab A de 10 polegadas. Uma atualização foi necessária, especialmente em relação ao software. Leia mais para descobrir como o Galaxy Tab A 10.1 se desempenha em nossos testes e se é uma atualização que vale a pena sobre o Galaxy Tab A 10.5.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/01/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Galaxy Tab A Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 7904 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

, LPDDR4

Pantalha

10.10 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Tela táctil multi-touch capacitiva, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.6 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB - com suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 245.2 x 149.4

Bateria

6150 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (CMOS, f/1.9, 1/4.0", autofocus, Full HD video)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (CMOS, f/2.2, 1/5.0", fixed focus, Full HD video)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, One UI 1.1, Microsoft Office, OneDrive, Galaxy Apps, Spotify, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

460 g

Preço

219 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Lenovo Tab M10 Apple iPad 6 2018 DIN A5 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad 6 2018 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe	500 MBit/s +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	312 (291^min - 325^max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash	290 (274^min - 309^max) MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash	227 MBit/s -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s -81%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPad 6 2018 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe	570 MBit/s +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash	298 (239^min - 314^max) MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash	241 MBit/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	216 (49^min - 250^max) MBit/s -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	51.7 MBit/s -83%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (239-314)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (274-309)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Overview

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Xiaomi Mi 9

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Xiaomi Mi 9

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Xiaomi Mi 9

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

A photo of our test chart taken in the dark


404 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	367 cd/m²
428 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	379 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	397 cd/m²	388 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 428 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 395.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.06 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 802:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Huawei MediaPad M5 lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Lenovo Tab M10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5"	Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Screen		-5%	-5%	-37%	-41%	35%	25%	29%
Brightness middle	401	542 35%	426 6%	514 28%	339 -15%	556 39%	452 13%	530 32%
Brightness	396	520 31%	399 1%	492 24%	327 -17%	514 30%	453 14%	513 30%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	91 6%	80 -7%	86 0%	87 1%	90 5%	92 7%
Black Level *	0.5	0.68 -36%	0.38 24%	0.96 -92%	0.42 16%	0.42 16%		0.61 -22%
Contrast	802	797 -1%	1121 40%	535 -33%	807 1%	1324 65%		869 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.9	4.2 -45%	4.5 -55%	5.42 -87%	5.8 -100%	1.8 38%	1.7 41%	1.2 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.8	6.7 -16%	7.9 -36%	9.84 -70%	11.6 -100%	3.2 45%	3.7 36%	3.2 45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	4.8 -17%	5.2 -27%	6.5 -59%	8.6 -110%	2.2 46%	2.4 41%	1 76%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.42 ^91%	2.23 ^99%	2.216 ^99%	2.16 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	7263 ^89%	7434 ^87%	6875 ^95%	6780 ^96%	8718 ^75%	6819 ^95%	6337 ^103%	6588 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.6 ms rise
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.8 ms rise
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years)	3721 Points +193%
Apple iPad 6 2018	3499 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1712 Points +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1268 - 1329, n=3)	1306 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1268 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1204 Points -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	940 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab M10	774 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	745 Points -41%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years)	10683 Points +166%
Apple iPad 6 2018	5952 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	5742 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4017 - 4105, n=3)	4073 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	4017 Points
Lenovo Tab M10	3897 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3846 Points -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	3805 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	3305 Points -18%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (965 - 3811, n=3, last 2 years)	2829 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1772 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1263 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 ()	1263 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	753 Points -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (3276 - 10869, n=3, last 2 years)	7838 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	5626 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	4169 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	3799 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 ()	3799 Points 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	8126 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	6456 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5802 - 6923, n=4)	6452 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4914 Points -24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4895 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab M10	4836 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	4796 Points -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	Points -100%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	6698 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	5452 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5269 - 5474, n=4)	5372 Points -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	4719 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M10	4238 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4171 Points -23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	3678 Points -33%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	37372 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	19315 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	13608 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (13183 - 14020, n=4)	13567 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	13227 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10	12726 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12686 Points -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	11791 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	6905 Points -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	62626 Points +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	22381 Points +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (13392 - 14338, n=4)	13836 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	13794 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	12771 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10	12386 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12323 Points -11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	11419 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	6151 Points -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad 6 2018	15499 Points +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	15117 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	14147 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10	14076 Points +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	13310 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	13055 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	12994 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (12321 - 13009, n=4)	12706 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	12095 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018	3672 Points +351%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 5864, n=18, last 2 years)	2615 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2378 Points +192%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	814 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	806 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M10	804 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (752 - 827, n=4)	800 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	682 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	468 Points -43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	125 Points -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018	6095 Points +761%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 6698, n=18, last 2 years)	2648 Points +274%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2357 Points +233%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	708 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	696 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M10	694 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (650 - 713, n=4)	693 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	598 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	388 Points -45%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	99 Points -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4085, n=18, last 2 years)	2806 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2456 Points +44%
Lenovo Tab M10	1816 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1802 Points +6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1758 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1677 - 1874, n=4)	1735 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1702 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1657 Points -3%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1535 Points -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1347 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=29, last 2 years)	5834 Points +527%
Apple iPad 6 2018	4190 Points +351%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2506 Points +169%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	930 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (752 - 933, n=4)	886 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	840 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab M10	822 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	821 Points -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	701 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	485 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=29, last 2 years)	8711 Points +960%
Apple iPad 6 2018	7253 Points +782%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2534 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	822 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (650 - 824, n=4)	780 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	754 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	712 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M10	712 Points -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	602 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	402 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=29, last 2 years)	3648 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2413 Points +41%
Lenovo Tab M10	1782 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1766 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1740 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1716 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1677 - 1745, n=4)	1712 Points 0%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1690 Points -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1648 Points -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1399 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 6 2018	2735 Points +328%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)	2050 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1594 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	639 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (582 - 647, n=4)	626 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	489 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M10	442 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	441 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	290 Points -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	241 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018	3682 Points +579%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)	2176 Points +301%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1451 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	542 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (488 - 545, n=4)	529 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	413 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	363 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab M10	363 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	235 Points -57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	193 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)	2796 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2436 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab M10	1818 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1775 Points +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1744 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1657 - 1869, n=4)	1726 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1704 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1646 Points -3%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1439 Points -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1363 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)	4452 Points +589%
Apple iPad 6 2018	2955 Points +357%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1742 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	646 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (579 - 646, n=4)	629 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	612 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	498 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M10	498 Points -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	480 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	305 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)	5806 Points +961%
Apple iPad 6 2018	3852 Points +604%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1612 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	547 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (488 - 549, n=4)	533 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	528 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	413 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab M10	413 Points -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	399 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	247 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)	3620 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2424 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab M10	1785 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1768 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1755 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1709 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1657 - 1755, n=4)	1708 Points -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1632 Points -7%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1627 Points -7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1386 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (615 - 7863, n=50, last 2 years)	1959 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1540 Points +112%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (717 - 1091, n=4)	817 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	725 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (521 - 10276, n=50, last 2 years)	2044 Points +234%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1408 Points +130%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (604 - 964, n=4)	700 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	612 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1370 - 4352, n=50, last 2 years)	2520 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2288 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2028 - 2096, n=4)	2060 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	2053 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years)	63.9 fps +166%
Apple iPad 6 2018	59.7 fps +149%
Apple iPad 6 2018	59 fps +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	32 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	24 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	21 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	20 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab M10	20 fps -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (12 - 24, n=4)	20 fps -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	19 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	11 fps -54%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years)	187.6 fps +650%
Apple iPad 6 2018	125 fps +400%
Apple iPad 6 2018	118 fps +372%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	46 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	25 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	22 fps -12%
Lenovo Tab M10	22 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	21 fps -16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	20 fps -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (14 - 25, n=4)	19.5 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	12 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years)	52.1 fps +301%
Apple iPad 6 2018	40.9 fps +215%
Apple iPad 6 2018	40.3 fps +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	17 fps +31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.2 - 24, n=4)	13.8 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	13 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	9.5 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	8.8 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab M10	8.8 fps -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	8.6 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	4.5 fps -65%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years)	108.9 fps +738%
Apple iPad 6 2018	62.6 fps +382%
Apple iPad 6 2018	58.9 fps +353%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	29 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	13 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7 - 13, n=4)	11.3 fps -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	9.9 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	9.2 fps -29%
Lenovo Tab M10	9.2 fps -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	8.8 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	4.9 fps -62%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years)	39.4 fps +412%
Apple iPad 6 2018	27.3 fps +255%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3.8 - 17, n=4)	8.98 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	7.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	6.9 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	5.7 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab M10	5.7 fps -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	5.3 fps -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4.7 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	2.8 fps -64%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years)	78.2 fps +865%
Apple iPad 6 2018	42.7 fps +427%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	19 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	8.1 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.3 - 8.1, n=4)	7.15 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	6.1 fps -25%
Lenovo Tab M10	6 fps -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	5.4 fps -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4.9 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1.7 fps -79%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years)	24.6 fps +392%
Apple iPad 6 2018	17.9 fps +258%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	6.4 fps +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.7 - 10, n=4)	5.58 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.3 fps -34%
Lenovo Tab M10	3.3 fps -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	3 fps -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1.7 fps -66%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years)	46.4 fps +792%
Apple iPad 6 2018	26.8 fps +415%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	8.5 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	5.2 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.6 - 5.2, n=4)	4.55 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.4 fps -35%
Lenovo Tab M10	3.4 fps -35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	3.2 fps -38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1.8 fps -65%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)	18.6 fps +520%
Apple iPad 6 2018	12.3 fps +310%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	4.3 fps +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.7 - 5.8, n=4)	3.6 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	3 fps
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1.7 fps -43%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)	21 fps +1067%
Apple iPad 6 2018	10.8 fps +500%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	4.4 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1.8 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1.7 - 1.8, n=4)	1.775 fps -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1.1 fps -39%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)	26.9 fps +449%
Apple iPad 6 2018	20 fps +308%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	6.8 fps +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.2 - 9.7, n=4)	5.78 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	4.9 fps
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	2.7 fps -45%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)	55 fps +1000%
Apple iPad 6 2018	30.8 fps +516%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	12 fps +140%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	5 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.7 - 5, n=4)	4.85 fps -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	2.8 fps -44%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	12.04 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 ()	5.35 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	0 fps
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	7.67 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 ()	6.43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	13.1 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	8.72 (4.95^min - 24.96^max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.21 - 8.72, n=2)	7.47 fps -14%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	170921 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	156772 Points +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (101367 - 109906, n=4)	105710 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	101367 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	86908 Points -14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	77717 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M10	70878 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	70431 Points -31%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	122959 Points +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (71303 - 75333, n=2)	73318 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	71303 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	66863 Points -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	63777 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab M10	58122 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	55314 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	44191 Points -38%

VRMark - Amber Room
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1423 Score
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)	1183 Score
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 ()	927 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +150%
Apple iPad 6 2018	3163 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2653 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1679 - 1862, n=4)	1746 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1681 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1389 Points -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1312 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab M10	1138 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1015 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	389 Points -77%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +107%
Apple iPad 6 2018	6820 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	5315 Points +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3517 - 3957, n=4)	3783 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	3517 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	3080 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab M10	2845 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	2561 Points -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2329 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	2240 Points -36%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2894 Points +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1935 - 2973, n=4)	2285 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	2079 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	1948 Points -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1513 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	1362 Points -34%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1334 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	969 Points -53%
Lenovo Tab M10	846 Points -59%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +755%
Apple iPad 6 2018	6760 Points +530%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	2816 Points +162%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1038 - 1118, n=4)	1086 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1073 Points
Lenovo Tab M10	949 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	943 Points -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	836 Points -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	833 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	511 Points -52%
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018	1628 Points +60%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	1144 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	1016 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1010 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (974 - 1035, n=4)	1002 Points -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	742 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab M10	735 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	682 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	10 Points -99%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	1693 Points +462%
Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years)	1440 Points +378%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	444 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	301 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (241 - 301, n=2)	271 Points -10%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Samsung Exynos 7904

Average of class Tablet

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +391%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	33.6 Points +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4)	23.3 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2)	22.14 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	167.2 Points +288%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	49.12 Points +14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	46.39 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.2 - 45.1, n=4)	43.3 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	43.13 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)	29.6 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)	23.71 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	22.22 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	22.08 Points -49%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +167%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10)	79 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	66 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	56 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4)	50.8 Points -9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)	42 Points -25%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	34 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	33 Points -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +435%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (IOS 12.1.1)	65.5 (64^min - 67^max) runs/min +204%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	33.74 runs/min +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4)	22 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	21.58 runs/min

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points +229%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	27967 Points +222%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	11312 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	8696 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	8570 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4)	8407 Points -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)	5412 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	4078 Points -53%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	3990 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)	3855 Points -56%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	11529 ms * -184%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	11448 ms * -182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)	9789 ms * -141%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)	9249 ms * -128%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4)	4610 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	4055 ms *
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	3976 ms * +2%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)	3496 ms * +14%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	1026 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585	Huawei MediaPad M5 lite	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	Lenovo Tab M10	Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		5%	-31%	101%	-18%	-12%	32%	5%	668%
Sequential Read 256KB	300	285.6 -5%	215.8 -28%	308.1 3%	262.2 -13%	279.9 -7%	294.4 -2%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -19%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 248%
Sequential Write 256KB	90.7	103.3 14%	45.88 -49%	82.6 -9%	147.7 63%	52.6 -42%	197.1 117%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) 11%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 654%
Random Read 4KB	62.6	71.1 14%	23.46 -63%	73.5 17%	27.72 -56%	52.5 -16%	79.2 27%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -31%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 202%
Random Write 4KB	11.37	13.39 18%	10.01 -12%	77.3 580%	9.37 -18%	11.32 0%	18.79 65%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 97%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 1567%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	81.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	80.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	75.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	55.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -32%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -24%	72.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	30.14 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -54%	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	60.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -19%

PUBG Mobile

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; Smooth; 0.12.0: Ø29.6 (22-32)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; Balanced; 0.12.0: Ø25.8 (16-28)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; HD; 0.12.0: Ø29 (1-32)

Asphalt 9

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø27.5 (17-31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø28.7 (24-31)

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019; 4.4.22399: Ø46.8 (35-58)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.4 °C	31.3 °C	33.6 °C
36.3 °C	31 °C	32.2 °C
32.6 °C	30.8 °C	33.4 °C

Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 33 °C


29.3 °C	30.7 °C	33.1 °C
29.5 °C	29.8 °C	33.2 °C
29.4 °C	30.8 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 32.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Heatmap of the front of the device under load

Heatmap of the back of the device under load

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Ocioso	1.66 / 4.28 / 4.44 Watt
Carga	7.53 / 9.09 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh	Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh
Power Consumption		17%	12%	4%	3%	-60%	15%
Idle Minimum *	1.66	1.26 24%	1.18 29%	2.8 -69%	1.55 7%	2.2 -33%	2.07 -25%
Idle Average *	4.28	4.22 1%	4.65 -9%	3.3 23%	4.17 3%	7.8 -82%	3.94 8%
Idle Maximum *	4.44	4.29 3%	4.74 -7%	3.9 12%	4.25 4%	7.9 -78%	3.96 11%
Load Average *	7.53	5.48 27%	5.75 24%	5.2 31%	7.13 5%	12.6 -67%	4.07 46%
Load Maximum *	9.09	6.57 28%	6.97 23%	7.2 21%	9.63 -6%	12.8 -41%	5.73 37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 9.2)		12h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 47min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh	Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh
Battery Runtime		30%	22%	-28%	15%	-10%	-24%
Reader / Idle	1500	2634 76%	1960 31%	960 -36%	2162 44%	1263 -16%
H.264	838	893 7%	963 15%	585 -30%	934 11%	864 3%
WiFi v1.3	723	826 14%	938 30%	542 -25%	852 18%	623 -14%	714 -1%
Load	347	428 23%	385 11%	274 -21%	299 -14%	300 -14%	185 -47%

Pro

+ Design fino

+ Android 9.0 Pie

+ Modo Crianças

+ Bluetooth 5.0 com suporte para codecs de alta resolução

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Bom painel LCD

Contra

- Sem sensor de luz ambiente

- Tela mais escura que a do seu antecessor

- Cabo USB curto incluído na caixa

- Alto-falantes abaixo do esperado

- Jogos com engasgos

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) tablet review.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) é um tablet de nível básico acessível que já pode ser encontrado por menos de € 200 (~$ 223 USD). O mesmo se aplica ao seu antecessor, que tem uma melhor tela, alto-falantes e mais memória RAM. Além disso, o Tab A 10.5 tem uma duração de bateria mais longa e suporta um teclado opcional. O Tab A 10.1 brilha com seu SoC aprimorado e sua versão mais recente do Android. Vale a pena mencionar o último, pois os tablets muitas vezes não recebem atualizações de software com a mesma frequência que os smartphones.

No geral, escolher entre o Tab A 10.1 e seu antecessor depende do que você acha importante em um tablet. A diferença de preço entre os dois dispositivos provavelmente diminuirá no futuro, o que tornaria o Tab A 10.1 mais uma opção atraente.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, que é um bom valor pelo dinheiro e é bem adequado para uso por famílias com crianças pequenas.

2 GB de RAM e 32 GB de armazenamento são bastante frugais para um sistema com Android 9.0 Pie, especialmente porque a Samsung posicionou o Tab A 10.1 como um dispositivo familiar que suporta múltiplas contas de usuário. A falta de um sensor de luz ambiente e nenhum modo de leitura integrado parece também uma medida para reduzir custos. Resumindo, o Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, mas a Samsung cortou alguns cantos demais para o nosso gosto.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 - 11/05/2019 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

69 / 80 → 87%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

36 / 70 → 52%

Peso

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

8 / 78 → 10%

Desempenho da aplicação

51 / 92 → 55%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

78 / 91 → 85%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Médio

69%

81%

Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11226 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-06- 1 (Update: 2019-06- 2)