Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab P10
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1273:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Chuwi HiPad IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Chuwi Hi9 Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | -1% | 10% | 25% | 30% | |
| Brightness middle | 522 | 408.7 -22% | 308 -41% | 356 -32% | 382 -27% | 556 7% |
| Brightness | 495 | 396 -20% | 297 -40% | 340 -31% | 378 -24% | 514 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 87 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.51 -24% | 0.29 29% | 0.5 -22% | 0.24 41% | 0.42 -2% |
| Contrast | 1273 | 801 -37% | 1062 -17% | 712 -44% | 1592 25% | 1324 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 4.13 38% | 6.2 7% | 2.3 66% | 2.8 58% | 1.8 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.2 | 7.34 40% | 10.5 14% | 6.5 47% | 6 51% | 3.2 74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.1 | 4.4 52% | 6.6 27% | 1.4 85% | 3.5 62% | 2.2 76% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 9417 69% | 7389 88% | 8216 79% | 6565 99% | 6903 94% | 6819 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 34250 Hz | ≤ 4 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 34250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 34250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 36 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
| Chuwi HiPad | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
| Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Tab P10 | Chuwi HiPad | Chuwi Hi9 Plus | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -31% | -44% | 66% | 44% | -6% | 15% | 467% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 276.7 | 144.3 -48% | 145 -48% | 312.2 13% | 247.8 -10% | 285.6 3% | 274 ? -1% | 1045 ? 278% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 205.7 | 73.6 -64% | 132.5 -36% | 83.8 -59% | 126.8 -38% | 103.3 -50% | 176.6 ? -14% | 686 ? 233% |
| Random Read 4KB | 53.9 | 40.21 -25% | 42.2 -22% | 76.7 42% | 54.7 1% | 71.1 32% | 59.4 ? 10% | 189.4 ? 251% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.75 | 10.28 -35% | 13.01 -17% | 76.1 383% | 60.8 286% | 13.39 -15% | 32.2 ? 104% | 189.9 ? 1106% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.3 ? | 65.9 -22% | 21.16 -75% | 83.9 ? 0% | 85.1 ? 1% | 80.6 ? -4% | 77.4 ? -8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61 ? | 66.8 10% | 20.44 -66% | 72.5 ? 19% | 73.8 ? 21% | 60.4 ? -1% | 58.3 ? -4% |
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.01 / 4.16 / 4.17 Watt |
| Carga |
5.45 / 6.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -68% | -63% | -104% | -57% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.01 | 2.7 -167% | 2.18 -116% | 2.33 -131% | 2.01 -99% | 1.26 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 4.16 | 5.5 -32% | 5.29 -27% | 8.46 -103% | 5.4 -30% | 4.22 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.17 | 5.6 -34% | 5.37 -29% | 8.49 -104% | 5.44 -30% | 4.29 -3% |
| Load Average * | 5.45 | 7 -28% | 8.56 -57% | 11.14 -104% | 8.55 -57% | 5.48 -1% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 12.2 -77% | 12.86 -86% | 12.3 -78% | 11.53 -67% | 6.57 5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE 5070 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -38% | -37% | 13% | -22% | 21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1315 | 1241 -6% | 3329 153% | 1344 2% | 1960 49% | ||
| H.264 | 910 | 580 -36% | 702 -23% | 963 6% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 992 | 593 -40% | 616 -38% | 634 -36% | 525 -47% | 648 -35% | 938 -5% |
| Load | 289 | 93 -68% | 241 -17% | 196 -32% | 385 33% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet decente que tem uma pontuação geral que está no mesmo nível do Hi9Plus e do MediaPad T5 10 e está aquém do Galaxy Tab A. Não recomendamos o Tab P10 como um tablet para jogos, não é poderoso o suficiente para jogos com fome de desempenho. O tablet é adequado para jogos simples e tarefas gerais, como navegação na web, e-mails e assistir a vídeos.
O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet leve e elegante que está bem equipado, mas existem tablets mais potentes e com preços comparáveis no mercado.
O Tab P10 parece caro, graças à parte traseira do vidro e à estrutura metálica chanfrada, além de ter mais RAM e armazenamento interno do que os nossos dispositivos de comparação.
No entanto, recomendaríamos que espere até que a Lenovo liberte seu pacote Smart Dock, já que a empresa venderá o pacote pelo mesmo preço que atualmente vende o tablet. A Lenovo lançará primeiro o pacote para o Tab M10, após o qual começará a vender o pacote Tab P10. A empresa inicialmente venderá o pacote com 3 GB de RAM e 32 GB de versão de armazenamento, portanto, pode ser uma decisão mais sensata comprar a versão de maior capacidade se você não quiser a funcionalidade Amazon Alexa.
Lenovo Tab P10
- 01/21/2019 v6 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Price comparison
