Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab M8 HD: Navegação e streaming por pouco dinheiro
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320 | 305 g | 8.2 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 76.5 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720 | 363 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 78.7 % v6 (old) | 03/2019 | Alldocube M8 T801 MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4 | 345 g | 8.48 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8 | 316 g | 7.3 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 SD 429, Adreno 504 | 345 g | 8 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 379 cd/m²
Contraste: 1805:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Alldocube M8 T801 IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 TFT, 1280x800, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -81% | -48% | -49% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 379 | 359 -5% | 317.5 -16% | 405 7% | 377 -1% |
| Brightness | 346 | 358 3% | 320 -8% | 392 13% | 372 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 89 1% | 94 7% | 92 5% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.85 -305% | 0.5 -138% | 0.67 -219% | 0.29 -38% |
| Contrast | 1805 | 422 -77% | 635 -65% | 604 -67% | 1300 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 6.8 -79% | 6.12 -61% | 5.78 -52% | 6.1 -61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.5 | 17.3 -131% | 13.72 -83% | 9.82 -31% | 10.9 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 7.6 -52% | 5.8 -16% | 7.2 -44% | 6.6 -32% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.278 97% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7514 87% | 7160 91% | 7633 85% | 8405 77% | 7861 83% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | Alldocube M8 T801 | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -45% | -34% | 60% | 5% | -5% | 565% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 297.1 | 158.5 -47% | 142.8 -52% | 268.6 -10% | 291.9 -2% | 242 ? -19% | 1045 ? 252% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 79.6 | 41.89 -47% | 103 29% | 132.2 66% | 108.5 36% | 100.5 ? 26% | 686 ? 762% |
| Random Read 4KB | 77.4 | 26.98 -65% | 19.5 -75% | 62.8 -19% | 57.8 -25% | 43.2 ? -44% | 189.4 ? 145% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.84 | 12.25 -23% | 10.01 -37% | 65.1 311% | 16.89 7% | 22.4 ? 41% | 189.9 ? 1099% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.8 ? | 51.4 ? -39% | 84.9 ? 1% | 87.1 ? 4% | 71.8 ? -14% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.3 ? | 34.03 ? -47% | 70.7 ? 10% | 69.9 ? 9% | 52.9 ? -18% |
Asphalt 9: Legends
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.66 / 2.15 / 2.18 Watt |
| Carga |
2.48 / 3.49 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -72% | -213% | -142% | -21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.66 | 0.97 -47% | 3.4 -415% | 2.1 -218% | 0.62 6% |
| Idle Average * | 2.15 | 3.26 -52% | 5.1 -137% | 3.74 -74% | 2.68 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.18 | 3.37 -55% | 5.3 -143% | 4.33 -99% | 2.7 -24% |
| Load Average * | 2.48 | 5.68 -129% | 6 -142% | 6.32 -155% | 3.61 -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.49 | 6.21 -78% | 11.5 -230% | 9.13 -162% | 4 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -53% | -63% | -48% | -23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 3581 | 1168 -67% | 1154 -68% | 3132 -13% | |
| H.264 | 1696 | 498 -71% | 701 -59% | 934 -45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1124 | 490 -56% | 420 -63% | 627 -44% | 831 -26% |
| Load | 374 | 316 -16% | 298 -20% | 342 -9% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict - good-quality Lenovo Tab M8
O Lenovo Tab M8 HD se apresentou como um tablet simples para navegar e assistir vídeos ocasionais. Sua duração da bateria é particularmente impressionante, assim como o design fino e o acabamento de alta qualidade. Nossa unidade de teste super com facilidade o Amazon Fire HD 8 nestas áreas. Seu desempenho é um pouco melhor do que o do tablet da Amazon também, embora o Tab M8 HD ainda não consiga acompanhar seus outros concorrentes.
O Tab M8 HD da Lenovo é uma boa alternativa no segmento de tablets acessíveis.
No entanto, não espere muito das câmeras do tablet. Seu armazenamento interno limitado também é um pouco decepcionante, embora esse problema possa ser resolvido formatando o cartão microSD como armazenamento interno. As opiniões podem diferir sobre a utilidade da ampla gama de software que a Lenovo incluiu neste tablet. O modo infantil definitivamente dá uma boa impressão e a gestão do tablet pode economizar tempo aos usuários menos experientes que procurarem no menu de configurações do Android. Usuários cujas expectativas não são particularmente altas ficarão muito satisfeitos com o Tab M8 HD.
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
- 01/06/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
