Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 514 cd/m²
Contraste: 535:1 (Preto: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 47% | -3% | 38% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 514 | 382 -26% | 340 -34% | 443 -14% | 426 -17% |
| Brightness | 492 | 378 -23% | 320 -35% | 428 -13% | 399 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 92 15% | 84 5% | 94 18% | 91 14% |
| Black Level * | 0.96 | 0.24 75% | 0.19 80% | 0.36 62% | 0.38 60% |
| Contrast | 535 | 1592 198% | 1789 234% | 1231 130% | 1121 110% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.42 | 2.8 48% | 15 -177% | 3.3 39% | 4.5 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.84 | 6 39% | 22.8 -132% | 7.2 27% | 7.9 20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 3.5 46% | 4 38% | 2.9 55% | 5.2 20% |
| Gamma | 2.216 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.09 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6780 96% | 6903 94% | 6940 94% | 6961 93% | 6875 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -38% | -16% | -30% | -25% | 317% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 308.1 | 247.8 -20% | 173.7 -44% | 270.1 -12% | 262.2 -15% | 242 ? -21% | 1045 ? 239% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 82.6 | 126.8 54% | 92.4 12% | 135.5 64% | 147.7 79% | 100.5 ? 22% | 684 ? 728% |
| Random Read 4KB | 73.5 | 54.7 -26% | 13.7 -81% | 37.3 -49% | 27.72 -62% | 43.2 ? -41% | 189.2 ? 157% |
| Random Write 4KB | 77.3 | 60.8 -21% | 8.77 -89% | 11.8 -85% | 9.37 -88% | 22.4 ? -71% | 189.5 ? 145% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.7 ? | 85.1 ? 2% | 80.4 ? -4% | 83.9 0% | 55.5 ? -34% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 72.8 ? | 73.8 ? 1% | 56.8 ? -22% | 61.1 -16% | 30.14 ? -59% | 52.9 ? -27% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.8 / 3.3 / 3.9 Watt |
| Carga |
5.2 / 7.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -40% | -56% | 8% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 2.01 28% | 3.21 -15% | 1.23 56% | 1.55 45% |
| Idle Average * | 3.3 | 5.4 -64% | 5.97 -81% | 3.92 -19% | 4.17 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.9 | 5.44 -39% | 6.19 -59% | 4.03 -3% | 4.25 -9% |
| Load Average * | 5.2 | 8.55 -64% | 9.72 -87% | 5 4% | 7.13 -37% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 11.53 -60% | 9.97 -38% | 7.09 2% | 9.63 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | -54% | -20% | -34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2162 | 1344 -38% | 735 -66% | 1625 -25% | 960 -56% |
| H.264 | 934 | 702 -25% | 795 -15% | 585 -37% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 852 | 648 -24% | 387 -55% | 647 -24% | 542 -36% |
| Load | 299 | 196 -34% | 175 -41% | 256 -14% | 274 -8% |
Pro
Contra
O MediaPad M5 lite se saiu bem em nossa análise. Seu desempenho do sistema é suficiente para muitas cargas de trabalho diárias e ainda tem reservas para aplicativos mais exigentes. Os jogos modernos também podem ser jogados neste dispositivo, embora os usuários possam ter que se contentar com configurações gráficas médias.
O MediaPad M5 lite pode estar no nível do seu irmão mais velho em muitas áreas, com os principais pontos fracos sendo a tela e câmeras.
Por volta de £270 (~$350), a Huawei equipou muito bem o MediaPad M5 lite. Tem uma bateria grande, um leitor de digitais e LTE, bem como um bom leitor de cartões SD. No entanto, os usuários terão que aceitar baixa qualidade de câmera com uma resolução comparativamente baixa e opções limitadas de armazenamento, já que os aplicativos não podem ser armazenados no cartão microSD. Portanto, o armazenamento de aplicativos está limitado a 32 GB e a tela de baixo contraste pode não ser para todo mundo.
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
