Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 403 cd/m²
Contraste: 604:1 (Preto: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.278
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab 4 8 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -1% | 9% | 34% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 405 | 419 3% | 455 12% | 509 26% | 460 14% |
| Brightness | 392 | 412 5% | 446 14% | 477 22% | 445 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 91 -1% | 91 -1% | 90 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.39 42% | 0.51 24% | 0.48 28% | 0.45 33% |
| Contrast | 604 | 1074 78% | 892 48% | 1060 75% | 1022 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.78 | 8.5 -47% | 5.5 5% | 3.45 40% | 6.2 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.82 | 13.8 -41% | 14.8 -51% | 5.17 47% | 10.5 -7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 10.3 -43% | 5.5 24% | 4.5 37% | 6.5 10% |
| Gamma | 2.278 97% | 2.6 85% | 2.23 99% | 2.11 104% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 8405 77% | 6216 105% | 7852 83% | 7171 91% | 8056 81% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2451 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | Lenovo Tab 4 8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -58% | -30% | -39% | -36% | -29% | 276% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 268.6 | 159.1 -41% | 265.1 -1% | 218.1 -19% | 249.7 -7% | 242 ? -10% | 1045 ? 289% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 132.2 | 47.23 -64% | 72.3 -45% | 54 -59% | 117.2 -11% | 100.5 ? -24% | 686 ? 419% |
| Random Read 4KB | 62.8 | 21.55 -66% | 44 -30% | 25.96 -59% | 32.04 -49% | 43.2 ? -31% | 189.4 ? 202% |
| Random Write 4KB | 65.1 | 11.51 -82% | 7.1 -89% | 10.98 -83% | 31.35 -52% | 22.4 ? -66% | 189.9 ? 192% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 51.1 -40% | 84.8 0% | 78.6 -7% | 61.7 ? -27% | 71.8 ? -15% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 70.7 ? | 34.15 -52% | 61.1 -14% | 64.3 -9% | 23.52 ? -67% | 52.9 ? -25% |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 58 fps | ||
| minimal | 58 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 58 fps | ||
| high HD | 58 fps | ||
| Battle Bay | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| half resolution | 58 fps | ||
| full resolution | 58 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   1.5 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.1 / 3.74 / 4.33 Watt |
| Carga |
6.32 / 9.13 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 36% | 23% | 35% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 0.99 53% | 1.1 48% | 0.89 58% | 1.51 28% |
| Idle Average * | 3.74 | 2.74 27% | 3.51 6% | 3.13 16% | 3.64 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.33 | 2.83 35% | 4.14 4% | 3.36 22% | 3.68 15% |
| Load Average * | 6.32 | 4.51 29% | 4.86 23% | 3.93 38% | 6.95 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.13 | 5.69 38% | 6.13 33% | 5.45 40% | 9.11 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 34% | -11% | 16% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1154 | 2032 76% | 1207 5% | 1357 18% | 1110 -4% |
| H.264 | 701 | 744 6% | 603 -14% | 493 -30% | 583 -17% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 627 | 770 23% | 452 -28% | 895 43% | 546 -13% |
| Load | 298 | 393 32% | 276 -7% | 396 33% | 268 -10% |
Pro
Contra
Com o MediaPad M5 8.4, a Huawei está oferecendo um tablet bastante elegante no mercado, que vale o seu preço um pouco mais alto. Isso é garantido pelas boas câmeras, pela tela de alta resolução, pelos poderosos alto-falantes e por alguns gimmicks como a capacidade de fazer chamadas telefônicas. Oferece um bom desempenho e a carcaça ergonômica de alta qualidade se sente bem nas mãos.
No entanto, você terá que se virar sem uma porta de áudio clássica no MediPad M5 8.4, às vezes a tela táctil é um pouco imprecisa perto das bordas, e a tela tem uma forte tonalidade azul, que você pode reduzir com ferramentas internas. Enquanto um cartão microSD adicional pode ajudar a expandir o armazenamento interno que é dimensionado um pouco pequeno, você dificilmente pode fazer algo com relação ao alto consumo de energia. Felizmente, ainda tem uma duração de bateria razoável, de modo que o alto consumo não importa muito. O pior é provavelmente o afogamento significativo sob usos intensos mais longos.
A boa relação preço-desempenho e muitas vantagens, como imagens de câmera ricas em detalhes e uma ótima carcaça, merecem uma recomendação de compra para o MediaPad M5 8.4.
No geral, o MediaPad M5 8.4 recebe nossa recomendação de compra, já que é um dispositivo com uma boa relação preço-desempenho que parece de alta qualidade e não tem fraquezas muito graves.
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
- 09/17/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
