Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 (10,8 polegadas, LTE)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 382 cd/m²
Contraste: 1592:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | -92% | -8% | -27% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 382 | 530 39% | 340 -11% | 443 16% | 426 12% | 435 14% |
| Brightness | 378 | 513 36% | 320 -15% | 428 13% | 399 6% | 413 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 92 0% | 84 -9% | 94 2% | 91 -1% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.61 -154% | 0.19 21% | 0.36 -50% | 0.38 -58% | 0.25 -4% |
| Contrast | 1592 | 869 -45% | 1789 12% | 1231 -23% | 1121 -30% | 1740 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.2 57% | 15 -436% | 3.3 -18% | 4.5 -61% | 4.4 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 3.2 47% | 22.8 -280% | 7.2 -20% | 7.9 -32% | 7.7 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 1 71% | 4 -14% | 2.9 17% | 5.2 -49% | 3.2 9% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.09 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6903 94% | 6588 99% | 6940 94% | 6961 93% | 6875 95% | 7056 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 19530 Hz | ≤ 45 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 19530 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 45 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 19530 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -41% | -19% | -34% | -41% | -25% | 305% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 247.8 | 173.7 -30% | 270.1 9% | 262.2 6% | 133.5 -46% | 242 ? -2% | 1045 ? 322% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 126.8 | 92.4 -27% | 135.5 7% | 147.7 16% | 60.3 -52% | 100.5 ? -21% | 686 ? 441% |
| Random Read 4KB | 54.7 | 13.7 -75% | 37.3 -32% | 27.72 -49% | 38.8 -29% | 43.2 ? -21% | 189.4 ? 246% |
| Random Write 4KB | 60.8 | 8.77 -86% | 11.8 -81% | 9.37 -85% | 8.5 -86% | 22.4 ? -63% | 189.9 ? 212% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.1 ? | 80.4 ? -6% | 83.9 -1% | 55.5 ? -35% | 78.7 -8% | 71.8 ? -16% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 73.8 ? | 56.8 ? -23% | 61.1 -17% | 30.14 ? -59% | 56.8 -23% | 52.9 ? -28% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Battle Bay | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| half resolution | 60 fps | ||
| full resolution | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| minimal | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.15 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.01 / 5.4 / 5.44 Watt |
| Carga |
8.55 / 11.53 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | -17% | 35% | 20% | 27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.01 | 2.2 -9% | 3.21 -60% | 1.23 39% | 1.55 23% | 1.45 28% |
| Idle Average * | 5.4 | 7.8 -44% | 5.97 -11% | 3.92 27% | 4.17 23% | 4.44 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.44 | 7.9 -45% | 6.19 -14% | 4.03 26% | 4.25 22% | 4.61 15% |
| Load Average * | 8.55 | 12.6 -47% | 9.72 -14% | 5 42% | 7.13 17% | 6.21 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.53 | 12.8 -11% | 9.97 14% | 7.09 39% | 9.63 16% | 6.33 45% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -32% | 16% | -6% | 26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1344 | 735 -45% | 1625 21% | 960 -29% | 1345 0% | |
| H.264 | 702 | 795 13% | 585 -17% | 833 19% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 648 | 714 10% | 387 -40% | 647 0% | 542 -16% | 802 24% |
| Load | 196 | 185 -6% | 175 -11% | 256 31% | 274 40% | 312 59% |
Pro
Contra
No início de nossa análise, nos perguntamos se o tablet da Huawei realmente valeria o preço. A resposta é: Há vários destaques que fazem com que o tablet não pareça tão caro. Além disso, a relação preço/desempenho também é muito boa.
Esses destaques incluem: A tela de alta resolução com boa cobertura de espaço de cor, os alto-falantes poderosos e o ótimo desempenho. O fato de você poder fazer ligações telefônicas com o tablet também é um ponto positivo Bons dispositivos de entrada, software abrangente e carga rápida, completam o pacote.
No decorrer de nossa análise, também surgiram alguns pontos negativos: Os patches de segurança não estão atualizados, há muitos recursos de bloatware pré-instalados, o Wi-Fi é realmente lento e o GPS leva muito tempo para adquirir uma localização. O alto desempenho também não está disponível o tempo todo e o tablet se afoga drasticamente de vez em quando. Além disso, o dispositivo poderia ter sido um pouco mais rígido. A falta de rigidez elimina a impressão geral de alto valor que o tablet deixa.
Um tablet caro que vale o dinheiro.
No entanto, devido a que as câmeras são muito boas para um tablet e os dispositivos de entrada funcionam de forma muito confiável e oferecem opções de personalização extensas, podemos facilmente dar ao Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 uma recomendação clara. Aqueles que não precisam da funcionalidade LTE podem economizar dinheiro obtendo uma versão Wi-Fi simples.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
- 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
