Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 480:1 (Preto: 0.8 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 22% | 55% | 52% | 40% | 60% | |
| Brightness middle | 384 | 340 -11% | 530 38% | 443 15% | 426 11% | 382 -1% |
| Brightness | 360 | 320 -11% | 513 43% | 428 19% | 399 11% | 378 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 84 0% | 92 10% | 94 12% | 91 8% | 92 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.8 | 0.19 76% | 0.61 24% | 0.36 55% | 0.38 52% | 0.24 70% |
| Contrast | 480 | 1789 273% | 869 81% | 1231 156% | 1121 134% | 1592 232% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.83 | 15 -120% | 1.2 82% | 3.3 52% | 4.5 34% | 2.8 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.7 | 22.8 -80% | 3.2 75% | 7.2 43% | 7.9 38% | 6 53% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.5 | 4 47% | 1 87% | 2.9 61% | 5.2 31% | 3.5 53% |
| Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 8544 76% | 6940 94% | 6588 99% | 6961 93% | 6875 95% | 6903 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -27% | 6% | -14% | 70% | 47% | 658% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 278.6 | 173.7 -38% | 270.1 -3% | 262.2 -6% | 247.8 -11% | 274 ? -2% | 1045 ? 275% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 94.1 | 92.4 -2% | 135.5 44% | 147.7 57% | 126.8 35% | 176.6 ? 88% | 686 ? 629% |
| Random Read 4KB | 27.41 | 13.7 -50% | 37.3 36% | 27.72 1% | 54.7 100% | 59.4 ? 117% | 189.4 ? 591% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.35 | 8.77 -43% | 11.8 -23% | 9.37 -39% | 60.8 296% | 32.2 ? 110% | 189.9 ? 1137% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 80.4 ? -5% | 83.9 -1% | 55.5 ? -35% | 85.1 ? 0% | 77.4 ? -9% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 73.1 ? | 56.8 ? -22% | 61.1 -16% | 30.14 ? -59% | 73.8 ? 1% | 58.3 ? -20% |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| Battle Bay | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| full resolution | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (110.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.06 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  3.3 / 4.2 / 7 Watt |
| Carga |
10.4 / 13.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -16% | 43% | 31% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.21 3% | 2.2 33% | 1.23 63% | 1.55 53% | 2.01 39% |
| Idle Average * | 4.2 | 5.97 -42% | 7.8 -86% | 3.92 7% | 4.17 1% | 5.4 -29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 6.19 12% | 7.9 -13% | 4.03 42% | 4.25 39% | 5.44 22% |
| Load Average * | 10.4 | 9.72 7% | 12.6 -21% | 5 52% | 7.13 31% | 8.55 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 13.8 | 9.97 28% | 12.8 7% | 7.09 49% | 9.63 30% | 11.53 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -34% | -5% | 17% | -6% | 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1254 | 735 -41% | 1625 30% | 960 -23% | 1344 7% | |
| H.264 | 629 | 795 26% | 585 -7% | 702 12% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 670 | 387 -42% | 714 7% | 647 -3% | 542 -19% | 648 -3% |
| Load | 220 | 175 -20% | 185 -16% | 256 16% | 274 25% | 196 -11% |
Pro
Contra
Tela 2K de alta resolução, 4 alto-falantes Harman Kardon, uma boa câmera, sólida duração da bateria e carregamento rápido - o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro compartilha basicamente todos as virtudes do MediaPad X1 10.8. Além disso, ele vem com três bons recursos extras: A caneta digital, LTE por padrão e o SoC ligeiramente mais rápido. Comparado ao seu modelo irmão, o tablet também teve resultados de GPS mais convincentes, mas ficou para trás em termos de propriedades de tela.
O Huawei MediaPad M 5 10.8 Pro é um tablet caro, que, além de sua caneta digital, varia muito pouco do significativamente mais barato MediaPad M5 10.8
Quem precisa do MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro? Dado que o MediaPad X1 10.8 já se desempenhou maravilhosamente, teríamos que ser muito pressionados para encontrar uma razão para escolher o candidato de teste nominalmente mais rápido e não o visivelmente mais rápido. Além disso, o LTE também está disponível no modelo irmão mais barato, o que essencialmente reduz o motivo central da compra do Mate Pen 2. Embora combinado com a tela responsiva e precisa, ela proporciona uma experiência de escrita agradável, essa experiência tem um preço. Oficialmente, o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro custa 100 Euros (~$116) a mais do que um MediaPad X1 10.8 em sua configuração máxima.
Independentemente da variante que escolha, você não fará uma compra ruim. Atualmente, o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro e o MediaPad X1 10.8 pertencem aos tablets Android mais rápidos e bem equipados do mercado.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
- 08/22/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
