Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4

Evolução. O sucessor do MediaPad M2 de 2015 finalmente está aqui: por favor, deem as boas-vindas ao MediaPad M3. O novo modelo pode ter dimensões iguais às do predecessor, mas possui uma tela maior de resolução mais alta, um processador mais potente e um sensor de digitais. Vamos verificar o que a Huawei tem para oferecer em nossa análise.
MediaPad M3 (MediaPad M3 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
4 GB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
8.40 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 359 PPI, IPS, Ângulos de visão 80°/80°/80°/80° (topo/lado inferior/esquerda/direita), Cores: 16 milhões de cores, Contraste: 1,500:1, Brightness: 400 nits, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.04 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para headset de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro e Hall sensor, Giroscópio, Bússola, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 215.5 x 124.2
Bateria
19.5 Wh, 5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (Auto-focus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfokus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, ferramenta slot, protetor de tela, EMUI 4.1, Tablet-Manager, HiCare, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, Shazam, News Republic, Twitter, Booking.com, Instagram, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
310 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g
Preço
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front
Front
Front
Front
Buttons
Back
Main camera
Power adapter
Packaging

Size Comparison

215.5 mm 124.2 mm 7.3 mm 310 g214.8 mm 124 mm 7.8 mm 330 g205.4 mm 136.4 mm 7.57 mm 320 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 304 g200.4 mm 132.6 mm 6.95 mm 332 g198.6 mm 134.8 mm 5.6 mm 272 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +108%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
264 MBit/s +26%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +146%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 MBit/s +56%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -42%
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
438
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 468 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 445.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.78 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 460 cd/m²
Contraste: 1022:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Huawei MediaPad M2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8"
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8"
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"
Screen
Brightness middle
460
463
1%
386
-16%
347
-25%
425
-8%
411
-11%
Brightness
445
445
0%
364
-18%
348
-22%
402
-10%
421
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
88
-2%
88
-2%
91
1%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.45
0.47
-4%
0.57
-27%
0.4
11%
0.58
-29%
Contrast
1022
985
-4%
677
-34%
1063
4%
709
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.2
6.25
-1%
3.3
47%
1.67
73%
4.98
20%
2.15
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.5
7.1
32%
6.61
37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
6.16
5%
1.7
74%
1.75
73%
5.2
20%
2.72
58%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.43 91%
2.42 91%
2.27 97%
2.65 83%
2.29 96%
CCT
8056 81%
7921 82%
6397 102%
6361 102%
7249 90%
7012 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
95.4

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1480 Points -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2691 Points -49%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3144 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3121 Points -1%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
71734 Points -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points -16%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
4358 Points -16%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6018 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
5564 Points +7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
754 Points -26%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
873 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
952 Points -7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
820 Points -37%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1651 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
876 Points -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points +105%
System (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
1870 Points -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2076 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
2764 Points -23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points -46%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points -13%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
1093 Points -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1475 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1044 Points -42%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points -21%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points -7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
14 fps -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
27 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
29 fps +26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps +61%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
15 fps -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
34 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
24 fps -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps +10%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps +65%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps -40%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
15 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
10.4 fps -20%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps +65%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps -13%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
11 fps +22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps +70%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
9.5 fps +23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps +69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.1 fps +45%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps +50%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
11605 Points -43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18491 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
19317 Points -5%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points +26%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
11984 Points -46%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
22306 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
20006 Points -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
10447 Points -33%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11568 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
17240 Points +11%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points +30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
1019 Points -56%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1450 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1559 Points -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1572 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
55 Points -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
781 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
612 Points -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1261 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
70 Points -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
870 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
707 Points -27%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1319 Points +36%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2823 ms *
Huawei MediaPad M2
11544 ms * -309%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3803 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
6512 ms * -131%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
4420 ms * -57%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2557 ms * +9%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
11404 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
3866 Points -66%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
8349 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
7097 Points -38%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
7994 Points -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9962 Points -13%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
136 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
67 Points -51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
103 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
79 Points -42%
Apple iPad Mini 4
144 Points +6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
53.7 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
23 Points -57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
45.9 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
40.3 Points -25%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
43.04 Points -20%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchHuawei MediaPad M2Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001ASamsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTEXiaomi MiPad 2Apple iPad Mini 4
AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB
32.04
25.09
-22%
52
62%
25.53
-20%
24.42
-24%
Random Write 4KB
31.35
13.44
-57%
6.91
-78%
9.68
-69%
13.96
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
117.2
40.72
-65%
116.6
-1%
47.45
-60%
56.4
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
249.7
145
-42%
252.3
1%
248.3
-1%
147.9
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
23.52
20.61
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
61.7
39.62
-36%
BaseMark OS II
Memory
2212
1235
-44%
1590
-28%
593
-73%
1379
-38%
902
-59%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high20 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high44 fps
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C31.7 °C34.4 °C 
 32.6 °C32 °C34 °C 
 33 °C32.2 °C34.8 °C 
Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
29.8 °C30.9 °C31.4 °C
29.7 °C30.5 °C31.7 °C
29.7 °C31.4 °C32.9 °C
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.82525.437.23125.328.94032.930.85033.641.76331.632.88028.429.21002722.612520.828.61602242.920021.349.925020.851.131521.260.140019.46750019.570.463017.771.480017.972.6100017.875.5125017.375.3160017.475.5200016.775.3250017.277.8315018.281.7400017.979.3500017.670.9630017.765.9800017.867.71000017.962.71250018.151.91600018.247.7SPL3088N1.369.4median 17.9median 69.4Delta1.411.531.640.525.431.725.333.432.935.333.649.431.63428.426.22727.120.827.82234.821.343.120.849.121.254.719.458.219.56617.765.317.967.317.872.317.370.617.468.316.767.317.272.718.270.817.974.117.676.517.779.317.87917.973.118.160.418.252.33085.71.362.7median 17.9median 67.31.410.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchAsus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.38 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.51 / 3.64 / 3.68 Watt
Carga midlight 6.95 / 9.11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Power Consumption
14%
14%
-13%
-44%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.51
1.4
7%
1.01
33%
2
-32%
3.33
-121%
0.8
47%
Idle Average *
3.64
3.3
9%
2.71
26%
3.6
1%
5.01
-38%
3.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
3.68
3.4
8%
2.75
25%
4
-9%
5.19
-41%
3.9
-6%
Load Average *
6.95
5.5
21%
7.28
-5%
8.2
-18%
8.32
-20%
6.1
12%
Load Maximum *
9.11
7
23%
10.02
-10%
9.9
-9%
9.33
-2%
8
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 28min
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-4%
10%
-23%
8%
Reader / Idle
1110
1546
39%
1147
3%
1399
26%
1488
34%
H.264
583
727
25%
574
-2%
780
34%
643
10%
WiFi v1.3
546
525
-4%
470
-14%
442
-19%
421
-23%
539
-1%
Load
268
343
28%
263
-2%
265
-1%
242
-10%

Pro

+ Bom acabamento
+ Carcaça de metal rígida
+ Slot micro-SD
+ Funcionalidade USB OTG
+ Tela de alta resolução e brilhante
+ Prático leitor de digitais.
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo
+ Baixas emissões de calor.
+ Ótimo desempenho do navegador
+ Capa protetora de tela incluída

Contra

- A GPU é sobrecarregada ao rodar jogos muito exigentes
- Apenas Micro USB 2.0 disponível
- Sem flash LED
- Sem headset
- Sem NFC
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

O Huawei MediaPad M2 foi um aparelho confiável com alguns pontos fracos. O fabricante continuou neste caminho e construiu uma nova geração sobre as fundações confiáveis do predecessor. Com a sua sólida carcaça de metal e bons alto falantes, este prático tablet coincide com o seu predecessor de muitas maneiras. No entanto, a Huawei fez melhorias estratégicas: a câmera principal e o SoC são mais poderosos e a tela IPS tem uma resolução mais alta. Infelizmente, as últimas duas adições vêm com efeitos secundários não desejáveis: os jogos nem sempre conseguem rodar fluentemente com a resolução nativa e a bateria (apesar de ter 300 mAh a mais de capacidade) é esgotada mais rápido que antes em certas disciplinas. Afortunadamente, o tablet oferece ótimas durações da bateria durante a navegação pela web (teste de bateria WLAN). Apreciamos a adição do sensor de digitais, dado que facilita muito o desbloqueio do aparelho.

O MediaPad M3 é um tablet prático, que tem algumas fraquezas. Graças ao ótimo acabamento, o painel brilhante e de alta resolução e o veloz desempenho do navegador, este tablet pode servir bem aos usuários em suas tarefas diárias.

Se ainda não estiver convencido, recomendamos gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro com o Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0. Esse tablet oferece um contraste fino e uma tela AMOLED de alto contraste em um formato 4:3. No entanto, o tablet não oferece uma câmera frontal de alta qualidade.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch - 11/16/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
72 / 80 → 90%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
43 / 65 → 66%
Peso
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 68 → 61%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 76 → 76%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
65 / 85 → 76%
Médio
75%
87%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4
Andreas Kilian, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)