Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 460 cd/m²
Contraste: 1022:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Huawei MediaPad M2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Apple iPad Mini 4 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||||||
| Brightness middle | 460 | 463 1% | 386 -16% | 347 -25% | 425 -8% | 411 -11% |
| Brightness | 445 | 445 0% | 364 -18% | 348 -22% | 402 -10% | 421 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 88 -2% | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.47 -4% | 0.57 -27% | 0.4 11% | 0.58 -29% | |
| Contrast | 1022 | 985 -4% | 677 -34% | 1063 4% | 709 -31% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 6.25 -1% | 3.3 47% | 1.67 73% | 4.98 20% | 2.15 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.5 | 7.1 32% | 6.61 37% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 6.16 5% | 1.7 74% | 1.75 73% | 5.2 20% | 2.72 58% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.65 83% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 8056 81% | 7921 82% | 6397 102% | 6361 102% | 7249 90% | 7012 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 95.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 43 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | Huawei MediaPad M2 | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | Xiaomi MiPad 2 | Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | ||||||
| Random Read 4KB | 32.04 | 25.09 -22% | 52 62% | 25.53 -20% | 24.42 -24% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 31.35 | 13.44 -57% | 6.91 -78% | 9.68 -69% | 13.96 -55% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 117.2 | 40.72 -65% | 116.6 -1% | 47.45 -60% | 56.4 -52% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 249.7 | 145 -42% | 252.3 1% | 248.3 -1% | 147.9 -41% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 23.52 | 20.61 -12% | ||||
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 61.7 | 39.62 -36% | ||||
| BaseMark OS II | ||||||
| Memory | 2212 | 1235 -44% | 1590 -28% | 593 -73% | 1379 -38% | 902 -59% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 20 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 44 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.51 / 3.64 / 3.68 Watt |
| Carga |
6.95 / 9.11 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 4.800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 4 5124 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 14% | -13% | -44% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.51 | 1.4 7% | 1.01 33% | 2 -32% | 3.33 -121% | 0.8 47% |
| Idle Average * | 3.64 | 3.3 9% | 2.71 26% | 3.6 1% | 5.01 -38% | 3.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.68 | 3.4 8% | 2.75 25% | 4 -9% | 5.19 -41% | 3.9 -6% |
| Load Average * | 6.95 | 5.5 21% | 7.28 -5% | 8.2 -18% | 8.32 -20% | 6.1 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.11 | 7 23% | 10.02 -10% | 9.9 -9% | 9.33 -2% | 8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 4.800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 4 5124 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | -4% | 10% | -23% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1110 | 1546 39% | 1147 3% | 1399 26% | 1488 34% | |
| H.264 | 583 | 727 25% | 574 -2% | 780 34% | 643 10% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 546 | 525 -4% | 470 -14% | 442 -19% | 421 -23% | 539 -1% |
| Load | 268 | 343 28% | 263 -2% | 265 -1% | 242 -10% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei MediaPad M2 foi um aparelho confiável com alguns pontos fracos. O fabricante continuou neste caminho e construiu uma nova geração sobre as fundações confiáveis do predecessor. Com a sua sólida carcaça de metal e bons alto falantes, este prático tablet coincide com o seu predecessor de muitas maneiras. No entanto, a Huawei fez melhorias estratégicas: a câmera principal e o SoC são mais poderosos e a tela IPS tem uma resolução mais alta. Infelizmente, as últimas duas adições vêm com efeitos secundários não desejáveis: os jogos nem sempre conseguem rodar fluentemente com a resolução nativa e a bateria (apesar de ter 300 mAh a mais de capacidade) é esgotada mais rápido que antes em certas disciplinas. Afortunadamente, o tablet oferece ótimas durações da bateria durante a navegação pela web (teste de bateria WLAN). Apreciamos a adição do sensor de digitais, dado que facilita muito o desbloqueio do aparelho.
O MediaPad M3 é um tablet prático, que tem algumas fraquezas. Graças ao ótimo acabamento, o painel brilhante e de alta resolução e o veloz desempenho do navegador, este tablet pode servir bem aos usuários em suas tarefas diárias.
Se ainda não estiver convencido, recomendamos gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro com o Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0. Esse tablet oferece um contraste fino e uma tela AMOLED de alto contraste em um formato 4:3. No entanto, o tablet não oferece uma câmera frontal de alta qualidade.
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
- 11/16/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Price comparison
