Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) 10.8 - Uma alternativa Android para o Apple iPad Pro 11?
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
83.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 606 cd/m²
Contraste: 1894:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 22% | 3% | -29% | |
Brightness middle | 606 | 617 2% | 446 -26% | 503 -17% |
Brightness | 579 | 585 1% | 445 -23% | 477 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 86 -3% | 91 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.36 -13% | 0.29 9% | |
Contrast | 1894 | 1714 -10% | 1734 -8% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 0.94 68% | 2.7 7% | 4.4 -52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 1.87 69% | 5.4 10% | 10.4 -73% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 1.4 67% | 2.1 51% | 7.5 -74% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.156 102% | 2.05 107% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 7272 89% | 6733 97% | 6468 100% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23810 Hz | ≤ 38 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (409039 - 483224, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (55.1 - 65.9, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (101.2 - 115.5, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (97 - 119, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (63.9 - 74.1, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19885 - 23568, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1963 - 2345, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -34% | -6% | -4% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1789 | 1416 -21% | 483.7 -73% | 1547 ? -14% | 1045 ? -42% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 399 | 522 31% | 219.3 -45% | 575 ? 44% | 686 ? 72% |
Random Read 4KB | 224.6 | 191.6 -15% | 119.8 -47% | 210 ? -7% | 189.4 ? -16% |
Random Write 4KB | 262.4 | 170.2 -35% | 195.8 -25% | 188.5 ? -28% | 189.9 ? -28% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.4 ? | 70.5 ? -14% | 78.3 ? -5% | 70.6 ? -14% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.7 ? | 54.5 ? -24% | 65.3 ? -9% | 59.8 ? -17% |
PUBG Compare
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.39 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.98 / 5.66 / 5.69 Watt |
Carga |
6.96 / 6.98 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | 11% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.98 | 1.3 34% | 1.96 1% | 1.21 39% |
Idle Average * | 5.66 | 3.5 38% | 2.8 51% | 4.24 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.69 | 5.6 2% | 2.82 50% | 4.34 24% |
Load Average * | 6.96 | 12.5 -80% | 5.31 24% | 6.99 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 6.98 | 19.2 -175% | 11.91 -71% | 8.79 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | -7% | 10% | |
Reader / Idle | 1877 | 2001 7% | 1276 -32% | 2120 13% |
H.264 | 909 | 936 3% | 872 -4% | 950 5% |
WiFi v1.3 | 891 | 902 1% | 556 -38% | 792 -11% |
Load | 233 | 197 -15% | 340 46% | 309 33% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - O MatePad Pro é um tablet de nicho premium
Um veredicto geral sobre o último tablet Huawei é quase impossível, dada a falta de serviços móveis do Google e a falta de uma certificação Widevine L1 - preferências individuais e comportamento de uso pessoal são essenciais aqui. Os amantes de multimídia precisam estar cientes de que a reprodução de conteúdo protegido por DRM é muito ruim. Esclareceremos se isso acaba afetando a versão alemã assim que o exemplar de teste com o software alemão chegar até nós.
A falta de serviços do Google torna muito difícil usar os aplicativos do Google e causa problemas com muitos aplicativos de terceiros. Aplicativos de fontes externas podem ser instalados, mas isso apresenta um risco de segurança para usuários inexperientes, e até mesmo usuários experientes às vezes não entenderão a maneira como os arquivos APK de fontes externas irão interagir com seu sistema.
Apesar disso, o MatePad Pro oferece um sistema de alto-falantes com bom som, longa duração e desempenho decente. Além disso, o tablet da Huawei tem uma construção muito boa e recursos raramente encontrados no mercado de tablets, como carregamento sem fio e carregamento sem fio reverso.
Mas o hardware do MatePad Pro não está isento de críticas. Dada a faixa de preço, o tablet deve vir com uma opção de desbloqueio biométrico seguro e uma fonte de alimentação de 40 watts suficientemente poderosa. Além disso, um tablet premium pode ter uma tela OLED ou uma tela IPS com uma alta taxa de atualização à la iPad Pro. A decisão de ir com a tecnologia LC e seus pontos fracos (turvação, ângulos de visão), em combinação com o buraco perfurado (que cria sombras), não vai deixar os fãs da tela felizes.
O MatePad Pro é um belo tablet, mas no geral não é recomendável para a maioria.
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
- 07/06/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich