Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Tablet Google Pixel C
Google Pixel C (Pixel Serie)
Processador
Nvidia Tegra X1 8 x 1.9 GHz, Erista (Cortex-A57 + A53)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU
Memória
3 GB
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
10.20 polegadas 2:1.4, 2560 x 1800 pixel, LTPS, 308 ppi, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
, 52.9 GB livre
peso
517 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 509.8 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 487 cd/m²
Contraste: 1249:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.16
| Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -2% | -12% | 18% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 487 | 423 -13% | 430 -12% | 358 -26% | 471 -3% |
| Brightness | 510 | 427 -16% | 411 -19% | 357 -30% | 457 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 92 1% | 86 -5% | 92 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.61 -56% | 0.77 -97% | 0.46 -18% | |
| Contrast | 1249 | 693 -45% | 558 -55% | 1024 -18% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.24 | 2.86 45% | 3.17 40% | 1.78 66% | 8.69 -66% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.95 | 2.37 70% | 3.29 59% | 1.38 83% | 11.24 -41% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.43 91% | 2.39 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6565 99% | 6941 94% | 6746 96% | 6366 102% | 9508 68% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 62 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
3DMark | Geekbench 3 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | Smartbench 2012 | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | PCMark for Android
| 3DMark - 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Smartbench 2012 | |
| Productivity Index (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Gaming Index (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Google Nexus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.07 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.82 / 4.26 / 4.33 Watt |
| Carga |
9.82 / 13.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -22% | -17% | -22% | |
| H.264 | 740 | 562 -24% | 597 -19% | 651 -12% | 705 -5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 638 | 393 -38% | 525 -18% | ||
| Load | 294 | 212 -28% | 224 -24% | 291 -1% | 166 -44% |
| WiFi | 630 | 574 |
Pro
+ Ótimo design
+ Materiais sofisticados
+ Android 6.0
+ SoC veloz
+ 3 GB de RAM
+ USB Tipo C
+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Alta estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
+ Boa câmera sob a luz do dia
+ Longas durações da bateria
Contra
- Sem slot microSD
- Sem GPS
- Sem WWAN
- Ruído da câmera em situações de baixa iluminação
- O teclado custa 170 Euros extras
Muitos recursos do Google Pixel C de 10.2-polegadas são convincentes. Graças ao seu belo design e o sofisticado chassi de alumínio, seu visual e sensação táctil pode competir facilmente com qualquer iPad. As vantagens são, entre outras, o moderno SO Android, o SoC de gama alta Nvidia Tegra X1 com 3 GB de memória, a tela LCD muito brilhante com amplos ângulos de visão e apresentação de cores com alto contraste, bem como as durações muito longas da bateria. Além disso, você recebe gadgets como a porta USB Tipo-C e a possibilidade de transformar o Pixel C em um tipo de portátil com o teclado opcional.
O Google Pixel C é um a tablet muito bom que pode competir com os tops da Apple e da Samsung.
Não muito o que criticar: Nem o modelo de 32 GB nem o de 64 GB do Pixel C tem um slot microSD, portanto, você deve pensar sobre seus requerimentos de armazenamento antes de comprar o tablet. Nem o GPS nem o WWAN estão incluídos – você pelo menos obtém o veloz Wi-Fi 802.11ac. No entanto, teríamos gostado de ver um cabo USB Tipo-C para transferir arquivos com um PC. Infelizmente, Google somente o vende na loja online e cobra altos 15 Euros (~$17) por ele. Outro acessório bastante caro é o teclado opcional por 170 Euros (~$191).
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Google Pixel C
-
04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Tablet - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
