Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Google Pixel C

Ambições de portátil. SoC poderoso, boa tela, o mais recente Android 6.0 e inclusive um teclado opcional: O Google Pixel C de 10,2-polegadas deseja competir com tablets de gama alta e, de fato consegue deixar um uma impressão muito boa em nossa análise.
Google Pixel C (Pixel Serie)
Processador
Nvidia Tegra X1 8 x 1.9 GHz, Erista (Cortex-A57 + A53)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU
Memória
3 GB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
10.20 polegadas 2:1.4, 2560 x 1800 pixel, LTPS, 308 ppi, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, NFC, Sensores: Sensor de luz ambiente, Giroscópio, Acelerõmetro, bússola, sensor Hallr, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7 x 242 x 179
Bateria
34 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Gravações de vídeo em até 1080p
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Gravações de vídeo em até 1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
517 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

254 mm 167 mm 6.1 mm 393 g242 mm 179 mm 7 mm 517 g240 mm 169.5 mm 6.1 mm 444 g237.3 mm 169 mm 5.6 mm 387 g228.3 mm 153.7 mm 7.95 mm 422 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
513
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 509.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 487 cd/m²
Contraste: 1249:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.16
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-2%
-12%
18%
-22%
Brightness middle
487
423
-13%
430
-12%
358
-26%
471
-3%
Brightness
510
427
-16%
411
-19%
357
-30%
457
-10%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
92
1%
86
-5%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.61
-56%
0.77
-97%
0.46
-18%
Contrast
1249
693
-45%
558
-55%
1024
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.24
2.86
45%
3.17
40%
1.78
66%
8.69
-66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.95
2.37
70%
3.29
59%
1.38
83%
11.24
-41%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.43 91%
2.39 92%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
6565 99%
6941 94%
6746 96%
6366 102%
9508 68%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
62
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8791 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

3DMark - 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
40665 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
21707 Points -47%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33812 Points -17%
Google Nexus 9
26455 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
19867 Points -51%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
24566 Points -40%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
4216 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4530 Points +7%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5419 Points +29%
Google Nexus 9
3154 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
4221 Points 0%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
3949 Points -6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
1411 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1816 Points +29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3200 Points +127%
Google Nexus 9
1879 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1247 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1298 Points -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
39 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
52.1 fps +34%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
59.3 fps +52%
Google Nexus 9
43.4 fps +11%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
56 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps -26%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
37 fps -5%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
69 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
70.4 fps +2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
163.2 fps +137%
Google Nexus 9
57.8 fps -16%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
65 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps -45%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
54 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
40 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
37.6 fps -6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps +100%
Google Nexus 9
31 fps -22%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
32 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps -57%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
26 fps -35%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
22 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
27 fps +23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps +51%
Google Nexus 9
22.5 fps +2%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
29 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps -45%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
16 fps -27%
Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
9834 points
Google Nexus 9
3910 points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12400 points +26%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7118 points -28%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
4497 points
Google Nexus 9
4435 points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
4489 points 0%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
4138 points -8%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
90568 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
101062 Points +12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points +104%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
87000 Points -4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
1909 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1967 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points +72%
Google Nexus 9
1845 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1482 Points -22%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
2724 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4104 Points +51%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points +129%
Google Nexus 9
1729 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points +5%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2488 Points -9%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
868 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
832 Points -4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points +134%
Google Nexus 9
1509 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points -32%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
954 Points +10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
6355 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
4920 Points -23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points +33%
Google Nexus 9
8602 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points -78%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2683 Points -58%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
884 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
1263 Points +43%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points +23%
Google Nexus 9
516 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
758 Points -14%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
764 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
754 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1871 Points +145%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
665 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
0 Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
6858 Points
Google Nexus 9
5841 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
4441 Points -35%

Legend

 
Google Pixel C Nvidia Tegra X1, NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 Apple A8X, PowerVR GXA6850, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
 
Google Nexus 9 Nvidia Tegra K1 (Denver), NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 Nvidia Tegra K1, NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
833 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
291.1 ms * +65%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
181 ms * +78%
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
919 ms * -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1016 ms * -22%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
553 ms * +34%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7563 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10512 Points +39%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
19852 Points +162%
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
8210 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6885 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7790 Points +3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5533 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2396 ms * +57%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
1499 ms * +73%
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
4031 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6483 ms * -17%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4064 ms * +27%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8439 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9355 Points +11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
19567 Points +132%
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
10142 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7197 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7177 Points -15%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
158 Points +23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
215 Points +68%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
106 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79 Points -38%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
93 Points -27%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
154.3 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
279.2 MB/s +81%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
105 (105min - 113max) MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
248.2 MB/s +61%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256 MB/s +66%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109.4 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
75.5 MB/s -31%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44 (40min - 46max) MB/s -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.37 MB/s -55%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81 MB/s -26%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19.96 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
36.22 MB/s +81%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.5 (12min - 13max) MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25.56 MB/s +28%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MB/s 0%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10.08 MB/s
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.49 MB/s +44%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.5 (1.9min - 2.6max) MB/s -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.82 MB/s -3%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13.6 MB/s +35%
Carga Máxima
 40.1 °C31.3 °C28.9 °C 
 42.3 °C31.3 °C29.5 °C 
 35.7 °C32.9 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
29 °C33.5 °C34.9 °C
28.3 °C33.6 °C36 °C
29.5 °C31.5 °C33.5 °C
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.82 / 4.26 / 4.33 Watt
Carga midlight 9.82 / 13.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 54min
Google Pixel C
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPad Air 2 2014
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 9
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-26%
-22%
-17%
-22%
H.264
740
562
-24%
597
-19%
651
-12%
705
-5%
WiFi v1.3
638
393
-38%
525
-18%
Load
294
212
-28%
224
-24%
291
-1%
166
-44%
WiFi
630
574

Pro

+ Ótimo design
+ Materiais sofisticados
+ Android 6.0
+ SoC veloz
+ 3 GB de RAM
+ USB Tipo C
+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Alta estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
+ Boa câmera sob a luz do dia
+ Longas durações da bateria

Contra

- Sem slot microSD
- Sem GPS
- Sem WWAN
- Ruído da câmera em situações de baixa iluminação
- O teclado custa 170 Euros extras
In Review: Google Pixel C. Test model courtesy of Google Germany.
In Review: Google Pixel C. Test model courtesy of Google Germany.

Muitos recursos do Google Pixel C de 10.2-polegadas são convincentes. Graças ao seu belo design e o sofisticado chassi de alumínio, seu visual e sensação táctil pode competir facilmente com qualquer iPad. As vantagens são, entre outras, o moderno SO Android, o SoC de gama alta Nvidia Tegra X1 com 3 GB de memória, a tela LCD muito brilhante com amplos ângulos de visão e apresentação de cores com alto contraste, bem como as durações muito longas da bateria. Além disso, você recebe gadgets como a porta USB Tipo-C e a possibilidade de transformar o Pixel C em um tipo de portátil com o teclado opcional.

O Google Pixel C é um a tablet muito bom que pode competir com os tops da Apple e da Samsung.

Não muito o que criticar: Nem o modelo de 32 GB nem o de 64 GB do Pixel C tem um slot microSD, portanto, você deve pensar sobre seus requerimentos de armazenamento antes de comprar o tablet. Nem o GPS nem o WWAN estão incluídos – você pelo menos obtém o veloz Wi-Fi 802.11ac. No entanto, teríamos gostado de ver um cabo USB Tipo-C para transferir arquivos com um PC. Infelizmente, Google somente o vende na loja online e cobra altos 15 Euros (~$17) por ele. Outro acessório bastante caro é o teclado opcional por 170 Euros (~$191).

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Google Pixel C - 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
76 / 80 → 95%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
33 / 65 → 50%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
49 / 76 → 65%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
75 / 85 → 88%
Médio
77%
90%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Google Pixel C
Manuel Masiero, 2016-02-20 (Update: 2016-02-22)