Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Tablet Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
5855-9576 (Venue Serie)
Processador
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4 x 1.4 - 2.2 GHz, Cherry Trail
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Análises do: 646 MHz
Memória
4 GB
, DDR3-1600 (dual-channel), soldada
Pantalha
8.00 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel, 10 dedos, native pen support, MS 9001, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Cherry Trail
Disco rígido
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, 64 GB
peso
377 g
Preço
449 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MS 9001 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 279 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 254.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 279 cd/m²
Contraste: 1395:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
49% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
50.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 IPS, 1920x1200 | Dell Venue 8 Pro IPS, 1280x800 | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA IPS, 1280x800 | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 IPS, 1920x1200 | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 IPS, 1920x1200 | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) IPS, 1280x800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 2% | 25% | -8% | -2% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 279 | 380.2 36% | 347 24% | 207 -26% | 389 39% | 234 -16% |
| Brightness | 255 | 365 43% | 333 31% | 205 -20% | 371 45% | 229 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 86 1% | 91 7% | 89 5% | 88 4% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.312 -56% | 0.11 45% | 0.14 30% | 0.25 -25% | 0.22 -10% |
| Contrast | 1395 | 1219 -13% | 3155 126% | 1479 6% | 1556 12% | 1064 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.64 | 7.03 8% | 5.45 29% | 7.98 -4% | 10.28 -35% | 6.2 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.3 | 9.42 38% | 17.5 -14% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.22 | 7.12 -14% | 10.63 -71% | 8.36 -34% | 9.65 -55% | 5.9 5% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 1.59 138% | 1.34 164% | 2.21 100% | 1.25 176% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 6798 96% | 6988 93% | 6404 101% | 7768 84% | 6657 98% | 7678 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 49 | 53.88 10% | 52 6% | 41 -16% | 51 4% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 71 | 80 13% | 64 -10% | 77.7 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
3DMark | 3DMark 11 | PCMark 8 | CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 Z3745, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -6% | -11% | 11% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 40.4 -4% | 44.7 -15% | 47.6 -22% | 35.1 10% | 47 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.8 | 48 -3% | 48.5 -4% | 47.6 -2% | 44.5 5% | 49 -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.4 | 32.3 -0% | 31.2 4% | 35 -8% | 26.3 19% | 30 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 29.2 -0% | 31.4 -8% | 32.4 -11% | 26.3 10% | 27 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.3 / 0.32 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.4 / 4 / 4.2 Watt |
| Carga |
8.8 / 9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 Intel Atom Z3735G | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Intel Atom Z3736F | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Intel Atom Z3735F | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 Intel Atom Z3745 | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -34% | -65% | -0% | 15% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.4 | 4 -67% | 5.6 -133% | 1.8 25% | 1.3 46% | 1.7 29% |
| Idle Average * | 4 | 6.4 -60% | 7.4 -85% | 3.2 20% | 3.2 20% | 1.7 57% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.2 | 6.6 -57% | 7.6 -81% | 4.4 -5% | 3.4 19% | 3.3 21% |
| Load Average * | 8.8 | 8.6 2% | 8.6 2% | 10.8 -23% | 8.6 2% | 7.4 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 9 | 8.1 10% | 11.5 -28% | 10.6 -18% | 10 -11% | 12.1 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 18.3 Wh | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 18 Wh | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA 18 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 39 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 24 Wh | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | 53% | 49% | -3% | -38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 857 | 711 -17% | 1066 24% | 829 -3% | ||
| H.264 | 314 | 367 17% | 180 -43% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 320 | 491 53% | 600 88% | 214 -33% | ||
| Load | 187 | 130 -30% | 251 34% | |||
| WiFi | 402 | 368 |
Pro
+ Alto desempenho do hardware
+ Equipado com Windows 10 Professional
+ Construção sólida
Contra
- Tela um pouco escura
- Duração média da bateria
- Conectividade pobre
O Dell Venue 8 Pro, sem dúvida é um tablet sólido. O desempenho que a Dell extrai da plataforma Cherry Trail da Intel parece incrível.
A configuração de 4 GB de memória de trabalho em modo dual-channel garante boas vantagens no desempenho, em comparação com muito rivais. Com o Windows 10 Professional e 64 GB memória eMMC de alto desempenho, o Venue 8 Pro é muito agradável para trabalhar com tarefas do dia a dia.
A tela de alta resolução não é tão proeminente - embora ofereça imagens ricas e coloridas, tem um brilho apenas medíocre. A conectividade é muito escassa e praticamente força o usuário a comprar um dos replicadores de portas relativamente caros. A ausência de um dock de teclado teria sido desejável nestes tempos de conversíveis e cia., especialmente porque outra bateria poderia ter aproveitado o espaço do teclado para compensar pela duração de bateria um pouco abaixo da média.
Finalmente, o Dell Venue 8 Pro convence como um pacote completo. Os compradores à procura de um tablet Windows tão compacto com hardware de alto desempenho encontrarão poucas alternativas. Os primeiros conversíveis baseados em CPUs Core m, como o Microsoft Surface Pro 4, fornecem mais desempenho, mas também são normalmente maiores (e, é claro, bastante mais caros que o nosso modelo de teste que custa cerca de 450 Dólares americanos).
Somente podemos esperar que a nova linha chegue até as lojas da Alemanha.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
-
04/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Tablet - Médio equilibrado