Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Dell Latitude 11 5175

O tablet empresarial perfeito? O Dell Latitude 11 5175 é um tablet Windows que oferece um generoso portfólio de extensões para seus clientes. Será isso suficiente para encontrar compradores? Vamos esclarecer quão bem o Dell Latitude 11 5175 se sai contra seus rivais e onde se posiciona tecnicamente em nosso teste a profundidade.
Dell Latitude 11 5175 (Latitude 11 5100 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core m5-6Y57 2 x 1.1 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 515, Análises do: 900 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 20.19.15.4326
Memória
8 GB 
, LPDDR3-1600 MHz, dual-channel, fixa
Pantalha
10.80 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 204 PPI, Corning Concore Glass, YJ0MP-TV108FM, IPS, multi-touch de 10 dedos, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Estéreo, Card Reader: micro-SD, Sensores: giroscópio, eCompass/magnetômetro, acelerômetro/FFS, GPS (apenas via cartão WWAN), efeito Hall, Noble Lock slot, micro-HDMI
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.78 x 279.8 x 176.8
Bateria
35 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix traseira
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix frontal
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Fonte de alimentação, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
710 g, Suprimento de energia: 234 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

456
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
YJ0MP-TV108FM tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 469 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 448.7 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 461 cd/m²
Contraste: 1027:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80.76% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.21% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Display
14%
-24%
-11%
-13%
Display P3 Coverage
63.4
67.5
6%
44.4
-30%
53.8
-15%
52.9
-17%
sRGB Coverage
81.1
96.6
19%
66.4
-18%
73.7
-9%
71.8
-11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
59.3
69
16%
45.91
-23%
53.8
-9%
52.6
-11%
Response Times
-31%
20%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46 ?(19, 27)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8)
-0%
33.2 ?(15.2, 18)
28%
47 ?(16, 31)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(7.2, 18.8)
31 ?(6, 25.2)
-19%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
12%
26 ?(5, 21)
-0%
PWM Frequency
200
50 ?(50)
-75%
Screen
12%
-31%
-21%
2%
-23%
Brightness middle
462
389.2
-16%
364
-21%
322
-30%
365
-21%
353
-24%
Brightness
449
392
-13%
331
-26%
319
-29%
342
-24%
347
-23%
Brightness Distribution
86
92
7%
84
-2%
97
13%
86
0%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.45
0.27
40%
0.44
2%
0.42
7%
0.329
27%
0.44
2%
Contrast
1027
1441
40%
827
-19%
767
-25%
1109
8%
802
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.4
3.61
18%
7.32
-66%
6.02
-37%
4.37
1%
6.09
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.21
10.06
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.49
3.8
-9%
7.37
-111%
6.29
-80%
2.8
20%
6.24
-79%
Gamma
2.55 86%
2.16 102%
2.03 108%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
CCT
6256 104%
5969 109%
6479 100%
7712 84%
6595 99%
7238 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
53.21
63
18%
42.2
-21%
47.8
-10%
46
-14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
80.76
97
20%
66.1
-18%
73.2
-9%
71
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 3%
-28% / -29%
-4% / -13%
2% / 2%
-12% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWINFO
DPC Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
171 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
206 Points +20%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
153 Points -11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
255 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
184 Points +8%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
177 Points +4%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
95 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
88 Points -7%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
84 Points -12%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
111 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
95 Points 0%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
80 Points -16%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1.93 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2.27 Points +18%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.72 Points -11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2.7 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
2.04 Points +6%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
2.15 Points +11%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1.1 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
0.98 Points -11%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
0.99 Points -10%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
1.26 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
1.13 Points +3%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
0.94 Points -15%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
7877 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
8886 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
8432 Points +7%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
8461 Points +7%
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4859 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4297 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
4985 Points +3%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
5022 Points +3%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4899
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6204
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3809
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
5330 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
7877 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4859 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
20.28 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
24.46 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
95 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2641 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -8%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2397 Points -9%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
2690 Points +2%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
2675 Points +1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2905 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2968 Points +2%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2705 Points -7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3423 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
3090 Points +6%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
3362 Points +16%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3720 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -14%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3480 Points -6%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
3806 Points +2%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
4078 Points +10%
Storage Score v2 (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4937 Points
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
4895 Points -1%
PCMark 7
Score (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4289 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4274 Points 0%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
4087 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
4808 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
4602 Points +7%
Productivity (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2127 Points
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2068 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2361 Points +11%
Entertainment (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3002 Points
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2863 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3491 Points +16%
System Storage (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
5282 Points
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
5144 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
5243 Points -1%
PCMark 7 Score
4289 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2641 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2905 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3720 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Sequential Read: 472.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 296.8 MB/s
512K Read: 383.8 MB/s
512K Write: 296.8 MB/s
4K Read: 30.89 MB/s
4K Write: 71.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 243.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 198.6 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
951 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1344 Points +41%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
625 Points -34%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
1334 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
753 Points -21%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
1098 Points +15%
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
863 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1206 Points +40%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
555 Points -36%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
1200 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
669 Points -22%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
996 Points +15%
3DMark
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
35822 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
42046 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
29336 Points -18%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
47242 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
35119 Points -2%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
42545 Points +19%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3748 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4604 Points +23%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2946 Points -21%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
4943 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
3522 Points -6%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
4546 Points +21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
545 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
740 Points +36%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
371 Points -32%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
739 Points +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
450 Points -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
660 Points +21%
3DMark 11 Performance
951 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
35822 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3748 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
545 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
274 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 32.99 17.76 15.32 4.39
Battlefield 4 (2013) 22.56 15.23 9.69 5.64
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 7.96 5.18
Carga Máxima
 44.1 °C40.4 °C34.1 °C 
 40.2 °C39.5 °C32.9 °C 
 37.3 °C37.5 °C33.6 °C 
Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C
35.5 °C43.1 °C43.3 °C
35.6 °C40.5 °C40.3 °C
34.1 °C35.1 °C36.4 °C
Máximo: 43.3 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Power Consumption
21%
-46%
-15%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
1.5
44%
3.7
-37%
2
26%
4.5
-67%
Idle Average *
5.8
4
31%
6.8
-17%
6
-3%
7.7
-33%
Idle Maximum *
6.6
5
24%
7.6
-15%
6.6
-0%
8.3
-26%
Load Average *
15.2
13.9
9%
22.5
-48%
17.6
-16%
19.8
-30%
Load Maximum *
16.1
16.9
-5%
34.5
-114%
29.7
-84%
20.6
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.36 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.7 / 5.8 / 6.6 Watt
Carga midlight 15.2 / 16.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 11 5175
35 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
54 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
37 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2
35 Wh
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
42 Wh
Battery Runtime
-2%
55%
-6%
8%
1%
Reader / Idle
793
791
0%
1063
34%
732
-8%
964
22%
954
20%
H.264
411
658
60%
432
5%
360
-12%
WiFi v1.3
426
488
15%
675
58%
443
4%
361
-15%
Load
172
138
-20%
288
67%
130
-24%
197
15%
166
-3%
WiFi
396
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (25.10586.0.0)
7h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 52min

Pro

+ Tela IPS brilhante e com ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Processador Core m5 passivamente resfriado
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Veloz SSD de 256 GB
+ USB 3.0 de tamanho completo
+ Boa câmera

Contra

- O processador não pode desenvolver todo o seu potencial
- 12 meses de garantia padrão
- Falhas de produção menores em nosso modelo de teste
- Apenas uma porta USB 3.0 Type-C
- Acessórios relativamente caros da Dell
In review: Dell Latitude 11 5175. Test model courtesy of Dell Germany
In review: Dell Latitude 11 5175. Test model courtesy of Dell Germany

O Dell Latitude 11 5175 é um bom tablet empresarial com uma carcaça projetada de forma simples. O processador Intel Core m5-6Y57instalado, tem suficiente poder para lidar com a rotina no escritório. O baixo TDP do processador permite um resfriamento passivo. Com 256 GB, o SSD tem suficiente capacidade de armazenamento e garante um sistema fluido com boas taxas de leitura e escritura. A tela táctil Full HD oferece um brilho muito bom e inclusive permite o uso em exteriores sob a luz do sol. A tela táctil funciona com precisão e responde rapidamente a entradas que são implementadas sem muita perda de tempo. Além disso, o painel IPS convence com sua muito boa estabilidade dos ângulos de visão. Outro ponto positivo é o bom desempenho da bateria que também permite o uso móvel prolongado.

O tablet é uma boa entrada no setor empresarial. No entanto, não há forma de que os acessórios proprietários funcionem de forma mais produtiva com o Dell 11 5175. O dock de teclado deve, pelo menos, estar na lista de compras.

O Dell Latitude 11 5175 deve aceitar alguns pontos de crítica. O desempenho do processador não está plenamente disponível. Por isso, deve-se esperar evidentes perdas de desempenho. O Microsoft Surface Pro 4 equipado com um Core m3, roda com maior velocidade, em comparação. A tela não é recomendável para o uso profissional dado que a cobertura do espaço de cores está apenas em um nível médio.

Os compradores potenciais agora conhecem as capacidades do Dell Latitude 11 5175 e onde ele tem desvantagens. Os compradores que possam viver bem com 1080p e também com uma cobertura de espaço de cores limitada, devem colocar o tablet em sua lista de desejos. O desempenho da CPU é suficiente para o fluxo de trabalho fluente, apesar das restrições. Dificilmente existe um tablet que consiga utilizar o seu poder pleno dos processadores Core m.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Dell Latitude 11 5175 - 04/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
54 / 80 → 67%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
45 / 65 → 69%
Peso
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
50 / 68 → 73%
Desempenho da aplicação
72 / 76 → 95%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
98%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
53 / 85 → 63%
Médio
73%
85%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Dell Latitude 11 5175
Sebastian Bade, 2016-05- 6 (Update: 2016-05- 9)