Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 3s 10 (Z500M-1H006A)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 489 cd/m²
Contraste: 1137:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.06
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Google Pixel C LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2" | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Triluminos display with X-Reality, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 3% | 4% | -20% | 20% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 489 | 423 -13% | 487 0% | 471 -4% | 358 -27% | 429 -12% |
| Brightness | 443 | 427 -4% | 510 15% | 457 3% | 357 -19% | 434 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 91 6% | 92 7% | 86 0% | 82 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.61 -42% | 0.39 9% | 0.46 -7% | 0.35 19% | |
| Contrast | 1137 | 693 -39% | 1249 10% | 1024 -10% | 1226 8% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 2.86 48% | 5.24 5% | 8.69 -58% | 1.78 68% | 4.61 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.6 | 9.28 20% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 2.37 65% | 7.95 -19% | 11.24 -68% | 1.38 79% | 6.64 1% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.43 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 7457 87% | 6941 94% | 6565 99% | 9508 68% | 6366 102% | 6929 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 35 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Random Read 4KB | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Random Write 4KB | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 26 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 59 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.59 / 4.14 / 4.23 Watt |
| Carga |
10.89 / 11.58 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 6200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -6% | -10% | -169% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.59 | 1.2 25% | 1.82 -14% | 2.3 -45% | 8.6 -441% |
| Idle Average * | 4.14 | 5.1 -23% | 4.26 -3% | 4.5 -9% | 11.26 -172% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.23 | 5.4 -28% | 4.33 -2% | 5 -18% | 11.3 -167% |
| Load Average * | 10.89 | 7.9 27% | 9.82 10% | 9.4 14% | 14.57 -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.58 | 11.1 4% | 13.99 -21% | 10.4 10% | 14.9 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 6200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | 30% | 10% | -6% | 12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1453 | 1364 -6% | 2090 44% | 2135 47% | 918 -37% | 1261 -13% |
| H.264 | 600 | 562 -6% | 740 23% | 705 18% | 651 9% | 644 7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 638 23% | 525 1% | 393 -24% | 558 8% | |
| Load | 225 | 212 -6% | 294 31% | 166 -26% | 291 29% | 323 44% |
| WiFi | 630 |
Pro
Contra
Estável, alta qualidade, boa tela, bons alto falantes, duração útil da bateria - o Asus ZenPad 3s 10 não apresenta maiores desvantagens em nossos teste. No entanto, não estamos muito certos se o modelo de teste nos impressionou ou não. O som dos alto falantes junto com todo seu software para aprimorar e o suporte para alta resolução é forte, mas isso soa muito melhor no papel que na vida real. A baixa dinâmica das câmeras em áreas brilhantes e escuras também não assombrará a ninguém.
No entanto, a coisa mais estranha é o comportamento do SoC que algumas vezes forneceu o melhor desempenho e depois caia para o outro extremo - nem tudo roda fluentemente no uso do dia a dia. Talvez uma atualização do software melhorará esse comportamento. O sistema de som muito alto que normalmente só pode ser diminuído em volume ou desligado em menus ocultos, também é irritante. Além disso, há muitos aplicativos pré-carregados que provavelmente alguns usuários nunca ativarão.
Basicamente, a compra de um Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M não é uma má decisão: O comprador recebe um tablet sólido com uma tela competitiva e boa carcaça. No entanto, muitos pequenos aborrecimentos em detalhes impedem o entusiasmo real.
Será que podemos outorgar uma recomendação de compra para o Asus ZenPad 3s 10? Depende: Ele certamente oferece muitos aspectos pelo preço que um iPad Air 2 não poderia melhorar muito, e ele inclusive consegue competir com o bastante mais caro Google Pixel C em muitas seções. O comprador receberá um tablet relativamente útil para o uso diário se não se espera muito dos alto falantes ou se não se depende muito do desempenho.
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
- 12/25/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
