Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 392 cd/m²
Contraste: 1568:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Medion Lifetab P10505 IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | -20% | -65% | -0% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 435 11% | 542 38% | 320 -18% | 363 -7% | 370 -6% |
| Brightness | 383 | 413 8% | 520 36% | 308 -20% | 344 -10% | 351 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 93 15% | 91 12% | 84 4% | 87 7% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.25 -0% | 0.68 -172% | 0.36 -44% | 0.34 -36% | 0.4 -60% |
| Contrast | 1568 | 1740 11% | 797 -49% | 889 -43% | 1068 -32% | 925 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.4 -5% | 4.2 -0% | 7.5 -79% | 3.25 23% | 4.6 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.2 | 7.7 31% | 6.7 40% | 16.1 -44% | 5.68 49% | 9.5 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.2 -10% | 4.8 -66% | 10.8 -272% | 2.78 4% | 6.5 -124% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.35 94% | 2.42 91% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7115 91% | 7056 92% | 7434 87% | 9907 66% | 6722 97% | 6354 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | Medion Lifetab P10505 | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 27% | 17% | -26% | -47% | 1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 216 | 133.5 -38% | 215.8 0% | 142.9 -34% | 127.8 -41% | 163.5 -24% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 66 | 60.3 -9% | 45.88 -30% | 44 -33% | 50.2 -24% | 121.2 84% |
| Random Read 4KB | 23 | 38.8 69% | 23.46 2% | 23 0% | 10.9 -53% | 25.79 12% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.8 | 8.5 -13% | 10.01 2% | 11.7 19% | 3.12 -68% | 7.36 -25% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 40.9 | 78.7 92% | 75.5 85% | 18.9 -54% | 37 -10% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.9 | 56.8 63% | 50.1 44% | 15.4 -56% | 24.7 -29% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 16 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.14 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.76 / 3.23 / 3.35 Watt |
| Carga |
4.79 / 5.72 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F 10200 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -41% | -36% | -81% | -88% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 1.45 -91% | 1.18 -55% | 2.01 -164% | 2.54 -234% | 1.22 -61% |
| Idle Average * | 3.23 | 4.44 -37% | 4.65 -44% | 4.82 -49% | 5.1 -58% | 3.15 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.35 | 4.61 -38% | 4.74 -41% | 4.89 -46% | 5.24 -56% | 3.39 -1% |
| Load Average * | 4.79 | 6.21 -30% | 5.75 -20% | 8.35 -74% | 7.07 -48% | 3.95 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.72 | 6.33 -11% | 6.97 -22% | 9.91 -73% | 8.24 -44% | 5.64 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F 10200 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | 66% | -1% | 59% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1321 | 1345 2% | 2634 99% | 1445 9% | 2830 114% | 1275 -3% |
| H.264 | 622 | 833 34% | 893 44% | 740 19% | 603 -3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 467 | 802 72% | 826 77% | 564 21% | 776 66% | 435 -7% |
| Load | 302 | 312 3% | 428 42% | 203 -33% | 415 37% | 279 -8% |
Pro
Contra
O Asus ZenPad 10 Z301ML oferece suporte LTE, um painel HD e uma carcaça elegante e relativamente leve por 240 euros (~$283). No entanto, isso envolve bastantes "poréms": O antigo Asus ZenPad 10 Z300M oferece uma melhor configuração em alguns aspectos e melhor desempenho, e custa muito menos. Muitos tablets do próximo nível de preços mais altos também entraram no nível de preços do ZenPad 10 e derrotaram o tablet em muitas áreas, como resolução, desempenho ou duração da bateria.
Então, por que a Asus fez um esforço para atualizar? Isto é difícil de responder. A versão Full HD Z301MFL recentemente lançada pode ser consideravelmente mais competitiva, especialmente porque oferece mais RAM e um SoC mais veloz.
As fortalezas do ZenPad 10 Z301ML são encontradas na tela de alto contraste, bom software com muitas configurações, câmeras decentes, e a conectividade LTE. No entanto, muitos tablets com preços similares o superam em muitos aspectos.
Comprar o dispositivo pode valer a pena se o preço baixar em breve, o dinheiro é um problema e um tablet com Internet móvel é necessário. Então o comprador receberá uma tela decente, câmeras com boa qualidade de imagem e, claro, LTE. No entanto, existem melhores alternativas para o preço atual do fabricante.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
- 08/15/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
