Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 – É assim como se faz uma atualização
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU | 468 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8 | 498 g | 7.3 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 617 cd/m²
Contraste: 1714:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.156
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | -11% | -79% | -76% | |
Brightness middle | 617 | 639 4% | 435 -29% | 446 -28% | 382 -38% |
Brightness | 585 | 591 1% | 422 -28% | 445 -24% | 378 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 90 7% | 86 2% | 92 10% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.45 -25% | 0.32 11% | 0.24 33% | |
Contrast | 1714 | 1420 -17% | 1359 -21% | 1592 -7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.94 | 0.92 2% | 1.18 -26% | 2.7 -187% | 2.8 -198% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.87 | 2.59 -39% | 2.27 -21% | 5.4 -189% | 6 -221% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.12 20% | 2.1 -50% | 3.5 -150% |
Gamma | 2.156 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.05 107% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 6733 97% | 6656 98% | 6502 100% | 6468 100% | 6903 94% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1316 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 1316 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 1316 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=13, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (124.5 - 127.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=3) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.3 / 3.5 / 5.6 Watt |
Carga |
12.5 / 19.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -186% | 23% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 4.4 -238% | 1.96 -51% | 2.01 -55% |
Idle Average * | 3.5 | 4.1 -17% | 8.7 -149% | 2.8 20% | 5.4 -54% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.6 | 7.5 -34% | 9.6 -71% | 2.82 50% | 5.44 3% |
Load Average * | 12.5 | 13.6 -9% | 44 -252% | 5.31 58% | 8.55 32% |
Load Maximum * | 19.2 | 15.2 21% | 61 -218% | 11.91 38% | 11.53 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | -50% | -2% | -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 2001 | 2056 3% | 690 -66% | 1276 -36% | 1344 -33% |
H.264 | 936 | 982 5% | 403 -57% | 872 -7% | 702 -25% |
WiFi v1.3 | 902 | 920 2% | 586 -35% | 556 -38% | 648 -28% |
Load | 197 | 208 6% | 115 -42% | 340 73% | 196 -1% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Atualizações sensatas e um preço mais baixo
A Apple fez algumas melhorias em seu modelo iPad Pro 11 2020 e até reduziu os preços da maioria das configurações. Embora isso possa parecer uma grande pechincha, o Apple iPad Pro ainda não sai barato. No entanto, muitos de seus aspectos também refletem os preços premium: Apesar de já serem a referência no setor de tablets, as câmeras foram aprimoradas ainda mais. Embora não possam corresponder às mais recentes câmeras de smartphones de gama alta, são mais do que capazes de tirar belas fotos.
A ampla gama de acessórios foi expandida com o Magic Keyboard e a porta USB Type-C também abre o tablet Apple para hardware de terceiros. Graças ao novo cursor, por exemplo, um mouse USB normal agora pode ser usado para navegar pelo sistema.
O dispositivo é poderoso, equipado com Wi-Fi e armazenamento rápidos, além de uma tela com muita precisão de cores e capaz de exibir animações extremamente fluentes graças à sua taxa de atualização de 120 Hz.
Atualizações sensatas e preços mais moderados: O Apple iPad Pro 11 é, mais uma vez, uma boa escolha em 2020, se você puder pagar.
Como a Apple fez atualizações razoáveis no geral, mesmo uma atualização da geração anterior pode valer a pena. O fato de a carcaça ser um pouco flexível demais é a única desvantagem real.
Nota: Como muitos de nossos benchmarks ainda não são compatíveis com o iPad OS 13.4 e o Magic Keyboard será lançado em maio como um acessório importante, atualizaremos nossa análise assim que as novas informações estiverem disponíveis.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
-
04/11/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt