Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad 6 2018
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: 869:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad (2017) IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -10% | -13% | 20% | -22% | -48% | |
| Brightness middle | 530 | 514 -3% | 634 20% | 650 23% | 452 -15% | 382 -28% |
| Brightness | 513 | 485 -5% | 625 22% | 614 20% | 468 -9% | 378 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 87 -5% | 90 -2% | 82 -11% | 92 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.46 25% | 0.39 36% | 0.42 31% | 0.24 61% | |
| Contrast | 869 | 1117 29% | 1626 87% | 1548 78% | 1592 83% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.4 -17% | 1.9 -58% | 1 17% | 1.8 -50% | 2.8 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 2.9 9% | 3.9 -22% | 1.9 41% | 4 -25% | 6 -88% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 2.1 -110% | 2.8 -180% | 1.5 -50% | 1.2 -20% | 3.5 -250% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6588 99% | 6647 98% | 7027 93% | 6734 97% | 6500 100% | 6903 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.32 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.06 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |   | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Average Apple A10 Fusion (1059 - 1693, n=5) | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Average Apple A10 Fusion (19783 - 27967, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch (Chrome 49) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| Average Apple A10 Fusion (200 - 204, n=3) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Average Apple A10 Fusion (165.9 - 172.6, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch (Chrome 49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Average Apple A10 Fusion (1026 - 1531, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad (2017) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.2 / 7.8 / 7.9 Watt |
| Carga |
12.6 / 12.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 4 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 6660 mAh | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 26% | 10% | 9% | 61% | 63% | 70% | 52% | 40% | 23% | 61% | 74% | 41% | 27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 1.44 35% | 1.55 30% | 2.06 6% | 0.72 67% | 1.03 53% | 0.54 75% | 0.8 64% | 2.08 5% | 2.01 9% | 0.89 60% | 0.54 75% | 1.6 27% | 1.829 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * | 7.8 | 6.12 22% | 8.58 -10% | 7.42 5% | 2.45 69% | 2.4 69% | 1.63 79% | 3.6 54% | 3.5 55% | 5.4 31% | 3.13 60% | 1.51 81% | 4.13 47% | 3.81 ? 51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 6.14 22% | 8.59 -9% | 7.47 5% | 2.52 68% | 2.6 67% | 1.67 79% | 3.9 51% | 3.58 55% | 5.44 31% | 3.36 57% | 1.54 81% | 4.22 47% | 4.35 ? 45% |
| Load Average * | 12.6 | 8.55 32% | 10.09 20% | 9.45 25% | 3.84 70% | 2.96 77% | 2.74 78% | 6.1 52% | 6.97 45% | 8.55 32% | 3.93 69% | 3.75 70% | 6.57 48% | 9.45 ? 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.8 | 10.62 17% | 10.61 17% | 12.31 4% | 9.02 30% | 6.6 48% | 7.78 39% | 8 37% | 7.4 42% | 11.53 10% | 5.45 57% | 5.01 61% | 8.32 35% | 13.3 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 6660 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 3% | 21% | 55% | 70% | 21% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 714 | 764 7% | 693 -3% | 736 3% | 760 6% | 895 25% | 698 -2% |
| Load | 185 | 225 22% | 199 8% | 257 39% | 375 103% | 396 114% | 266 44% |
| Reader / Idle | 1496 | 2036 | 2919 | 1903 | 1357 | 988 | |
| H.264 | 845 | 629 | 676 | 551 | 493 | 602 |
Pro
Contra
O iPad 2018 (6ª geração) é a pequena atualização que a folha de especificações promete. O SoC mais rápido, mas ainda desatualizado e o suporte para o Apple Pencil são os novos recursos mais importantes. A duração da bateria e o consumo de energia sofreram devido a essas atualizações, mas ainda são bons, em geral.
O aquecimento não nos preocupa e a tela ainda é muito boa. O espaço entre o vidro frontal e o painel do visor não é perfeito, mas, em compensação, o dispositivo é mais fácil de reparar se tela for quebrada. No entanto, se o iPad pode rivalizar Chromebooks nas escolas é questionável. O preço com o Pencil e o teclado é muito maior. Isso significa que o software tem que fazer a diferença, e a Apple geralmente consegue ganhar pontos com aplicativos de alta qualidade.
O novo iPad é acessível? O novo iPad é cerca de $80 mais barato que o iPad Mini, e os modelos Pro custam $649 na loja online da Apple. Bons tablets Android com tela comparável já estão disponíveis por menos de $350.
Apple iPad 6 2018
- 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner
Price comparison
