Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020): O Tablet Fire atualizado oferece significativamente mais potência
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 76.5 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720 | 363 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320 | 305 g | 8.2 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 SD 429, Adreno 504 | 345 g | 8 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 78.7 % v6 (old) | 03/2019 | Alldocube M8 T801 MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4 | 345 g | 8.48 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraPanoramaZoom (Fire HD 8: 2-fach, Rest: 5-fach)LowLight
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 501 cd/m²
Contraste: 2004:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 HD IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 TFT, 1280x800, 8" | Alldocube M8 T801 IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -153% | -54% | -94% | -105% | |
| Brightness middle | 501 | 359 -28% | 379 -24% | 377 -25% | 317.5 -37% |
| Brightness | 463 | 358 -23% | 346 -25% | 372 -20% | 320 -31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 89 5% | 88 4% | 87 2% | 94 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.85 -240% | 0.21 16% | 0.29 -16% | 0.5 -100% |
| Contrast | 2004 | 422 -79% | 1805 -10% | 1300 -35% | 635 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 6.8 -89% | 3.8 -6% | 6.1 -69% | 6.12 -70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.4 | 17.3 -106% | 7.5 11% | 10.9 -30% | 13.72 -63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 7.6 -660% | 5 -400% | 6.6 -560% | 5.8 -480% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6473 100% | 7160 91% | 7514 87% | 7861 83% | 7633 85% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 65790 Hz | ≤ 6 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 65790 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 65790 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 () | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 () | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 (90422 - 90442, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| VRMark - Amber Room | |
| Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 () | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 (23.6 - 24, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 (30 - 30, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 () | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 (4115 - 4222, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8168 (11103 - 11254, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | Alldocube M8 T801 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -46% | -2% | 1% | -41% | -8% | 520% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 315 | 158.5 -50% | 297.1 -6% | 291.9 -7% | 142.8 -55% | 242 ? -23% | 1045 ? 232% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 103.9 | 41.89 -60% | 79.6 -23% | 108.5 4% | 103 -1% | 100.5 ? -3% | 686 ? 560% |
| Random Read 4KB | 67.6 | 26.98 -60% | 77.4 14% | 57.8 -14% | 19.5 -71% | 43.2 ? -36% | 189.4 ? 180% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.72 | 12.25 -22% | 15.84 1% | 16.89 7% | 10.01 -36% | 22.4 ? 42% | 189.9 ? 1108% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.1 ? | 51.4 ? -39% | 83.8 ? 0% | 87.1 ? 4% | 71.8 ? -15% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62 ? | 34.03 ? -45% | 64.3 ? 4% | 69.9 ? 13% | 52.9 ? -15% |
PUBG Compare
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.18 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.72 / 2.97 / 2.99 Watt |
| Carga |
4.02 / 5.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | 27% | 13% | -139% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.72 | 0.97 -35% | 0.66 8% | 0.62 14% | 3.4 -372% |
| Idle Average * | 2.97 | 3.26 -10% | 2.15 28% | 2.68 10% | 5.1 -72% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.99 | 3.37 -13% | 2.18 27% | 2.7 10% | 5.3 -77% |
| Load Average * | 4.02 | 5.68 -41% | 2.48 38% | 3.61 10% | 6 -49% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.1 | 6.21 -22% | 3.49 32% | 4 22% | 11.5 -125% |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | 43% | 7% | -53% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2661 | 1168 -56% | 3581 35% | 3132 18% | |
| H.264 | 949 | 498 -48% | 1696 79% | 934 -2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 902 | 490 -46% | 1124 25% | 831 -8% | 420 -53% |
| Load | 286 | 316 10% | 374 31% | 342 20% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Totalmente melhorado
A versão 2020 do Fire HD 8 tem melhorias significativas de desempenho e um design um pouco mais moderno do que seu antecessor, o Fire HD 8 (2018). Pelo preço cotado, o equipamento não só está à altura dos concorrentes, mas também pode superá-los em algumas áreas como a velocidade WLAN. Além disso, o novo modelo tem duração de bateria significativamente melhor, que permite mais de 15 horas de autonomia, o que supera totalmente seu modelo anterior.
A Amazon melhora o Fire HD8 em todos os aspectos, mas ainda mantém seu preço baixo.
Independentemente do usuário optar por ter ou se livrar das "ofertas especiais", graças ao FireOS fortemente adaptado, o Fire HD 8 (2020) vale principalmente para clientes da Amazon que também fazem uso extensivo dos serviços da empresa. Dado que agora existem boas alternativas, como o Lenovo Tab M8 HD nesta faixa de preço, os usuários que desejam um tablet barato e de alto desempenho não precisam necessariamente comprar um dispositivo Fire. Mas se você possui um Fire HD 8 (2018) e gosta de usá-lo, vale a pena mudar para o modelo 2020, pois o desempenho melhorou totalmente.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
- 08/04/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
