Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019): Um tablet de 10 polegadas a um preço de barganha
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.9 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3 | 504 g | 9.8 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
74.7 % v6 (old) | 04/2018 | Alcatel 1T 10 MT8321, Mali-400 MP | 415 g | 9.4 mm | 10.10" | 1280x800 | |
78.1 % v7 (old) | 11/2017 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 MT8173, PowerVR GX6250 | 497 g | 9.8 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2 | 475 g | 7.7 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
76.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2019 | Lenovo Tab M10 SD 450, Adreno 506 | 480 g | 8.1 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 460 g | 7.5 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 449 cd/m²
Contraste: 748:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Alcatel 1T 10 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Lenovo Tab M10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -40% | -3% | -34% | -38% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 449 | 277 -38% | 426 -5% | 514 14% | 339 -24% | 401 -11% |
Brightness | 425 | 263 -38% | 399 -6% | 492 16% | 327 -23% | 396 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 80 -10% | 86 -3% | 86 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.49 18% | 0.38 37% | 0.96 -60% | 0.42 30% | 0.5 17% |
Contrast | 748 | 565 -24% | 1121 50% | 535 -28% | 807 8% | 802 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 5.8 -87% | 4.5 -45% | 5.42 -75% | 5.8 -87% | 2.9 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 13.1 -105% | 7.9 -23% | 9.84 -54% | 11.6 -81% | 5.8 9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.4 -42% | 5.2 -37% | 6.5 -71% | 8.6 -126% | 4.1 -8% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.216 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 7202 90% | 7260 90% | 6875 95% | 6780 96% | 8718 75% | 7263 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | |
Vulkan Medium Native | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 () | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 |
VRMark - Amber Room | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 () | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (25.5 - 34.5, n=3) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (45.4 - 53, n=4) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (46 - 60, n=4) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (24.8 - 28, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (8665 - 10670, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
Average Mediatek MT8183 (3957 - 4979, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | Alcatel 1T 10 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | Lenovo Tab M10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -55% | -36% | 40% | -20% | -12% | -17% | 361% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 266.2 | 137.2 -48% | 262.2 -2% | 308.1 16% | 279.9 5% | 300 13% | 242 ? -9% | 1045 ? 293% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 180.1 | 83.7 -54% | 147.7 -18% | 82.6 -54% | 52.6 -71% | 90.7 -50% | 100.5 ? -44% | 686 ? 281% |
Random Read 4KB | 75 | 12.72 -83% | 27.72 -63% | 73.5 -2% | 52.5 -30% | 62.6 -17% | 43.2 ? -42% | 189.4 ? 153% |
Random Write 4KB | 23.28 | 10.1 -57% | 9.37 -60% | 77.3 232% | 11.32 -51% | 11.37 -51% | 22.4 ? -4% | 189.9 ? 716% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.2 ? | 39.81 ? -48% | 55.5 ? -28% | 83.7 ? 8% | 83.5 ? 8% | 81.2 ? 5% | 71.8 ? -7% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52 ? | 31.99 ? -38% | 30.14 ? -42% | 72.8 ? 40% | 61.2 ? 18% | 65.6 ? 26% | 52.9 ? 2% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.28 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.14 / 3.71 / 3.74 Watt |
Carga |
5.26 / 7.68 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 6300 mAh | Alcatel 1T 10 4000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -25% | -26% | -6% | -28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.14 | 1.01 11% | 1.55 -36% | 2.8 -146% | 0.98 14% | 1.66 -46% |
Idle Average * | 3.71 | 3.69 1% | 4.17 -12% | 3.3 11% | 4.45 -20% | 4.28 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 3.74 | 3.81 -2% | 4.25 -14% | 3.9 -4% | 4.51 -21% | 4.44 -19% |
Load Average * | 5.26 | 6.17 -17% | 7.13 -36% | 5.2 1% | 5.78 -10% | 7.53 -43% |
Load Maximum * | 7.68 | 6.19 19% | 9.63 -25% | 7.2 6% | 7.18 7% | 9.09 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 6300 mAh | Alcatel 1T 10 4000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -43% | -32% | 3% | -30% | -7% | |
Reader / Idle | 1691 | 960 -43% | 2162 28% | 1290 -24% | 1500 -11% | |
H.264 | 1480 | 585 -60% | 934 -37% | 596 -60% | 838 -43% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 950 | 545 -43% | 542 -43% | 852 -10% | 580 -39% | 723 -24% |
Load | 228 | 274 20% | 299 31% | 240 5% | 347 52% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um atraente tablet de nível básico
O Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) é um dos tablets mais baratos de 10 polegadas no mercado. O tablet de US$ 150 oferece uma boa relação custo/benefício, embora sua publicidade da tela de bloqueio possa levar algumas pessoas a colocar a mão no bolso por US$ 15 adicionais para remover as "ofertas especiais" da Amazon.
No início desta análise, perguntamos para quem o Fire HD 10 (2019) é adequado. Depois de colocar o tablet à prova, diríamos que aqueles que buscam um dispositivo com uma tela grande na qual navegam na web e assistem a vídeos são os melhores candidatos ao Fire HD 10 (2019). Embora seu SoC octa-core seja poderoso, ele não consegue rodar todos os jogos modernos sem problemas. Portanto, o Fire HD 10 (2019) provavelmente irritaria os jogadores ávidos de dispositivos móveis. A falta de funcionalidade do Google de fábrica, provavelmente irritará aqueles que desejam baixar os jogos mais recentes. Embora ainda possa instalar a Google Play Store, a Amazon declara que isso anulará a garantia do seu dispositivo.
O Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) é um tablet econômico decente que oferece desempenho e duração da bateria comparativamente bons. Cuidado com o ecossistema da Amazon, pois você pode invalidar sua garantia instalando a Google Play Store.
O Fire HD 10 (2019) também possui uma excelente duração da bateria. No entanto, o tablet possui câmeras ruins, uma construção barata e não tem GPS, o qual deve ser considerados antes de comprá-lo. A interface do usuário do Fire OS também levará algum tempo para se acostumar, pois não se parece com o Android ou com a maioria das skins do Android. No geral, o Fire HD 10 (2019) é ideal para aqueles que já estão casados com o ecossistema da Amazon. A integração mais profunda do Alexa e o Modo Show também são bons toques que ajudam a distinguir o Fire HD 10 (2019) de seus pares.
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
- 12/02/2019 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero