Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)

Couchsurfer. Os clientes da Amazon Prime que não se importam com alguns anúncios encontrarão a sétima geração do Tablet Fire HD de 10 polegadas com excelente valor pelo dinheiro. Como esperado, o tablet não é um produto de gama alta, no entanto, ele vem com alguns componentes de alto valor que o tornam um especialista em entretenimento. Em nossa análise, verificaremos as limitações que você pode esperar com este dispositivo.
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Fire HD 10 Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT8173 4 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GX6250
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
10.10 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multitouch de 10 dedos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 53.99 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: kombinierter Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonanschluss (3,5 mm), Card Reader: micro-SD de até 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro de 3 eixos, OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.8 x 262 x 159
Bateria
24.82 Wh, 6300 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3,94 Volt, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix (720p Video)
Secondary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, Teclado: Virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, Fire OS, Alexa Hands-free, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
497 g, Suprimento de energia: 85 g
Preço
225 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g247 mm 170 mm 8.4 mm 505 g240 mm 169.5 mm 7.5 mm 478 g241 mm 164 mm 5.8 mm 430 g229.8 mm 159.8 mm 8 mm 460 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s +71%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s +8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s -78%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s +93%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s +5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s -49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s -80%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
395
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 426 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 399 cd/m² Minimum: 3.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 426 cd/m²
Contraste: 1121:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Lenovo Tab 4 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
IPS, 1280x800, 9.6"
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Screen
-11%
0%
2%
26%
Brightness middle
426
489
15%
316
-26%
410
-4%
514
21%
Brightness
399
443
11%
305
-24%
409
3%
485
22%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
86
-5%
92
1%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.43
-13%
0.2
47%
0.32
16%
0.46
-21%
Contrast
1121
1137
1%
1580
41%
1281
14%
1117
0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
5.5
-22%
5
-11%
4.5
-0%
1.4
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
11.6
-47%
8.7
-10%
14.2
-80%
2.9
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
6.7
-29%
5.7
-10%
2
62%
2.1
60%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.06 107%
2.25 98%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
CCT
6875 95%
7457 87%
7921 82%
6930 94%
6647 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 80650 Hz ≤ 55 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 80650 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 55 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 80650 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points +102%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
74177 Points +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
36871 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
36868 Points -42%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
4813 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
4518 Points -8%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3898 Points -20%
Work 2.0 performance score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
3458 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
3307 Points -10%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points +86%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1652 Points +26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
891 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
780 Points -41%
System
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points +101%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3071 Points +32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1475 Points -37%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1397 Points -40%
Memory
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1887 Points +25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1372 Points -9%
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
758 Points -50%
Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points +448%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1185 Points +42%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
444 Points -47%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
437 Points -48%
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points +20%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1086 Points +8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
753 Points -25%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
745 Points -26%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
676 Points -44%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
666 Points -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1896 Points -43%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1870 Points -43%
Compute RenderScript Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1398 Points -10%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad (2017)
29326 Points +122%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9548 Points -28%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
6116 Points -54%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
6100 Points -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad (2017)
44645 Points +250%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14121 Points +11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
5467 Points -57%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5456 Points -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
16449 Points +9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points
Apple iPad (2017)
13324 Points -12%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
10470 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
10388 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad (2017)
2584 Points +279%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1092 Points +60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
55 Points -92%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
53 Points -92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4320 Points +622%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
970 Points +62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
43 Points -93%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
42 Points -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1955 Points +45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points
Apple iPad (2017)
1074 Points -20%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
895 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
880 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad (2017)
1957 Points +300%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
887 Points +81%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
2519 Points +510%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
763 Points +85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
2054 Points +51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points
Apple iPad (2017)
1098 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps +167%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
23 fps +10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
13 fps -38%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
13 fps -38%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps +267%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
29 fps +32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7.7 fps -65%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
7.6 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps +202%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9.7 fps +2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
5.8 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5.5 fps -42%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps +310%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14 fps +41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
2.8 fps -72%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
2.7 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps +294%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps +482%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad (2017)
1061 Points

Legend

 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points +112%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55)
3596 Points -58%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
2955 Points -66%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
2657 Points -69%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points +50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55)
98 Points -28%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
62 Points -55%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
62 Points -55%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points +177%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55)
57.4 Points +24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
15.9 Points -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
13191 ms * -232%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
12386 ms * -212%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3976 ms *
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55)
3001 ms * +25%
Apple iPad (2017)
1458 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MLenovo Tab 4 10Huawei MediaPad T3 10
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
17%
12%
Sequential Read 256KB
262.2
209.3
-20%
275
5%
154.7
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
147.7
136.5
-8%
45.3
-69%
41.1
-72%
Random Read 4KB
27.72
24.85
-10%
32.3
17%
50
80%
Random Write 4KB
9.37
6.8
-27%
8.9
-5%
5.3
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
55.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
45.15 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
84.5
52%
83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.14 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
59.9
99%
58.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
95%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default60 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.1 °C32.7 °C31.2 °C 
 35.1 °C30.9 °C30 °C 
 32.5 °C29.9 °C30.2 °C 
Máximo: 36.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
26.3 °C32.7 °C39.9 °C
26.4 °C26.7 °C39 °C
26.2 °C27.8 °C33.6 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 31 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017): Heat map under load
Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017): Heat map under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.230.72532.937.63137.232.84031.727.95039.6356328.328.78027.328.110026.936.812526.733.41602438.220020.945.525020.952.931519.554.140018.55950017.565.263017.567.680015.768.6100015.872.5125016.672.7160015.876.7200015.474.8250015.573.431501672400015.877.650001678.9630016.373.4800016.368.31000016.265.21250016.460.31600016.445.7SPL28.686.1N1.163.2median 16.4median 67.6Delta2.210.131.640.125.444.225.338.432.94133.644.931.646.528.446.82748.320.848.72250.121.353.120.858.621.264.919.468.619.570.217.771.217.969.317.873.617.378.517.480.716.781.317.277.918.27817.984.517.68617.789.817.886.617.982.718.181.818.280.830951.3103.7median 17.9median 781.47.727.328.427.326.62826.62629.42629.23129.225.726.725.72726.72726.325.726.328.828.128.836.430.736.43321.73334.120.434.13922.53947.722.847.748.320.248.356.522.356.564.220.364.271.821.371.868.819.668.869.518.869.569.416.469.471.91671.972.515.872.574.615.874.676.315.376.38115.28180.41580.474.71574.776.415.276.467.315.267.352.615.152.687.23087.264.81.464.8median 68.8median 18.8median 68.812.73.512.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MHuawei MediaPad T3 10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad T3 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Charging Time of the Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)
Charging Time of the Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.55 / 4.17 / 4.25 Watt
Carga midlight 7.13 / 9.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Power Consumption
-15%
22%
-50%
Idle Minimum *
1.55
1.59
-3%
1.09
30%
2.06
-33%
Idle Average *
4.17
4.14
1%
3.71
11%
7.42
-78%
Idle Maximum *
4.25
4.23
-0%
3.84
10%
7.47
-76%
Load Average *
7.13
10.89
-53%
5.07
29%
9.45
-33%
Load Maximum *
9.63
11.58
-20%
6.88
29%
12.31
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Amazon Silk 61.2)
9h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 34min
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
4800 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
17%
-7%
31%
Reader / Idle
960
1453
51%
1134
18%
1496
56%
H.264
585
600
3%
527
-10%
845
44%
WiFi v1.3
542
518
-4%
632
17%
439
-19%
764
41%
Load
274
225
-18%
229
-16%
225
-18%

Pro

+ Boa tela
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Wi-Fi veloz
+ Alexa incluída
+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível

Contra

- Software base antigo
- Slot para cartões microSD lento
- Câmera ruim
Reviewed: Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)
Reviewed: Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)

Aqueles que compram um tablet Amazon Fire HD 10 da sétima geração receberão um especialista em multimídia no eco espaço da Amazon sem maiores deficiências. É exatamente isso o que faz do dispositivo uma alternativa real que pode ser adquirida por um preço bastante baixo.

No lado positivo, há uma boa tela, alto-falantes decentes, Wi-Fi rápido e um chipset rápido que, de outra forma, só pode ser usado em dispositivos mais caros. Por outro lado, o software de base antigo que provavelmente não receberá mais atualizações é uma desvantagem.

O Amazon Fire HD 10 é uma alternativa consciente para os consumidores de mídia.

Para ter certeza, recursos como NFC, aptX, GPS, Miracast, carregamento rápido ou uma melhor variedade de sensores estão faltando. Além disso, Alexa ainda não roda tçao fluentemente, embora isso seja corrigido com futuras atualizações. No entanto, a Amazon possui uma forte oferta combinada a um preço atraente.

 

 

Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 - 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
34 / 70 → 48%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Bateria
84%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 78 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
42 / 92 → 45%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
24 / 85 → 28%
Médio
66%
78%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-11-28 (Update: 2017-12- 7)