Breve Análise do Tablet Alldocube M8 T801
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Alldocube M8 T801 IPS, 8", 1920x1200 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 8", 1280x800 | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 7.9", 2048x1536 | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 8.4", 2560x1600 | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 IPS LCD, 8", 1920x1200 | Chuwi HiPad IPS, 10.1", 1920x1200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -41% | -4% | 44% | 7% | -24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 48 ? -50% | 31 ? 3% | 13 ? 59% | 42 ? -31% | 33.2 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 38 ? -32% | 32 ? -11% | 20.5 ? 29% | 16 ? 44% | 41.2 ? -43% |
PWM Frequency | 2451 ? | 2358 ? | ||||
Screen | -19% | 24% | 3% | 11% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 317.5 | 359 13% | 386 22% | 405 28% | 454 43% | 408.7 29% |
Brightness | 320 | 358 12% | 364 14% | 392 23% | 411 28% | 396 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 88 -6% | 92 -2% | 83 -12% | 85 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.85 -70% | 0.57 -14% | 0.67 -34% | 0.73 -46% | 0.51 -2% |
Contrast | 635 | 422 -34% | 677 7% | 604 -5% | 622 -2% | 801 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.12 | 6.8 -11% | 3.3 46% | 5.78 6% | 5.2 15% | 4.13 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.72 | 17.3 -26% | 7.1 48% | 9.82 28% | 8.36 39% | 7.34 47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 7.6 -31% | 1.7 71% | 7.2 -24% | 4.7 19% | 4.4 24% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.278 97% | 2.271 97% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7633 85% | 7160 91% | 6397 102% | 8405 77% | 7361 88% | 7389 88% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-23% | 10% /
18% | 24% /
11% | 9% /
10% | -2% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Vulkan Medium Native | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X () |
* ... smaller is better
Alldocube M8 T801 32 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 64 GB eMMC Flash | Alldocube Alldocube X 64 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | 17% | 45% | 320% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 56.8 | 66.1 | 73.1 | 59.1 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.4 | 87.2 | 84.9 | 80.1 | |
Random Write 4KB | 10.01 | 8.77 -12% | 11.62 16% | 15.35 53% | 24.43 144% |
Random Read 4KB | 19.5 | 13.7 -30% | 14.62 -25% | 27.41 41% | 142 628% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 103 | 92.4 -10% | 101.1 -2% | 94.1 -9% | 195.8 90% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 142.8 | 173.7 22% | 255.4 79% | 278.6 95% | 741 419% |
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 1157 pontos | |
Ajuda |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Alldocube M8 T801 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.1 / 5.3 Watt |
Carga |
6 / 11.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Alldocube M8 T801 MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab 4 8 425, Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 SD 660, Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 39% | 37% | 20% | 20% | 31% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 0.97 71% | 1.1 68% | 2.1 38% | 1.2 65% | 1.01 70% |
Idle Average * | 5.1 | 3.26 36% | 3.51 31% | 3.74 27% | 2.2 57% | 2.71 47% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.3 | 3.37 36% | 4.14 22% | 4.33 18% | 4.1 23% | 2.75 48% |
Load Average * | 6 | 5.68 5% | 4.86 19% | 6.32 -5% | 8.2 -37% | 7.28 -21% |
Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 6.21 46% | 6.13 47% | 9.13 21% | 12.2 -6% | 10.02 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 6000 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | 17% | 49% | 97% | 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 420 | 452 8% | 490 17% | 627 49% | 827 97% | 470 12% |
Reader / Idle | 1207 | 1168 | 1154 | 1364 | 1147 | |
Load | 276 | 316 | 298 | 221 | 263 |
Pro
Contra
As qualidades mais fortes do Alldocube M8 são a sua construção relativamente forte e 4G LTE opcional. A unidade se sente mais resistente do que a maioria em sua faixa de preço, pois é um pouco mais grossa. Estamos mais confortáveis recomendando o tablet para crianças ou para famílias em geral, pois é mais provável que ele sobreviva às inevitáveis quedas e contusões em comparação com alternativas mais finas ou mais leves.
De outra maneira, o restante do tablet é o padrão do orçamento. A tela é mais escura que a média, a duração da bateria não é impressionante, as câmeras são fracas e o desempenho não é perfeitamente fluente. Extras luxuosos como NFC, controle remoto IV, sensor de brilho automático e USB Type-C são omitidos.
O Alldocube M8 funciona melhor como tablet doméstico ou secundário quando está na estrada. Embora ele faça o trabalho, não tem desempenho, brilho, armazenamento, câmeras, longevidade ou recursos necessários para substituir uma alternativa ou um smartphone de gama média.
Alldocube M8 T801
- 03/15/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo