Breve Análise do Surface Book 3 13.5: O conversível da Microsoft está envelhecendo lentamente
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
85 % v7 (old) | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
89.8 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v6 (old) | 12/2017 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 2058:1 (Preto: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.52
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS AU Optronics B140QAN02.2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -7% | 3% | 8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 67.9 7% | 60.1 -5% | 66.6 5% | 69.6 10% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.1 | 95.7 1% | 85.5 -10% | 95.9 1% | 98.9 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 69.4 6% | 61.1 -7% | 67.5 3% | 71.5 9% |
Response Times | 14% | 32% | 41% | -2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 57 ? | 52.8 ? 7% | 36 ? 37% | 32 ? 44% | 60.8 ? -7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 38 ? | 30 ? 21% | 28 ? 26% | 23.6 ? 38% | 36.8 ? 3% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 10% | -30% | -7% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 391 | 385 -2% | 280 -28% | 284.6 -27% | 447.4 14% |
Brightness | 367 | 372 1% | 286 -22% | 269 -27% | 420 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 78 -9% | 86 0% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.208 -9% | 0.28 -47% | 0.31 -63% |
Contrast | 2058 | 1833 -11% | 1346 -35% | 1016 -51% | 1443 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.07 | 1.6 48% | 3.97 -29% | 2.07 33% | 4.23 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.74 | 4.5 5% | 8.29 -75% | 3.75 21% | 9.34 -97% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.52 | 3.42 -125% | 2.05 -35% | 1.32 13% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.5 58% | 2.83 21% | 1.7 53% | 6.1 -69% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6330 103% | 6502 100% | 6556 99% | 6627 98% | 6136 106% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 64 5% | 56 -8% | 61.7 1% | 64.8 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 95.9 1% | 85 -11% | 95.8 1% | 98.9 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
9% | -2% /
-18% | 12% /
1% | -5% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3369 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4466 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4184 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 17% | -0% | 94% | 45% | 65% | 4% | |
Write 4K | 88.4 | 140.6 59% | 54.6 -38% | 152 72% | 112.6 27% | 131.3 49% | 95.5 ? 8% |
Read 4K | 39.53 | 43.62 10% | 28.19 -29% | 45.96 16% | 131 231% | 52.4 33% | 38.3 ? -3% |
Write Seq | 691 | 343.3 -50% | 840 22% | 2069 199% | 458.9 -34% | 1613 133% | 759 ? 10% |
Read Seq | 1032 | 1452 41% | 905 -12% | 1708 66% | 1355 31% | 1613 56% | 1022 ? -1% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 279.6 | 344.4 23% | 409.5 46% | 465.4 66% | 341.3 22% | 411.6 47% | 303 ? 8% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 261.6 | 457.2 75% | 292.4 12% | 410.1 57% | 320.6 23% | 415.6 59% | 317 ? 21% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 868 | 344.3 -60% | 1038 20% | 2713 213% | 1219 40% | 2340 170% | 885 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2075 | 2885 39% | 1607 -23% | 3399 64% | 2462 19% | 1568 -24% | 1803 ? -13% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 410.9 | 306 ? | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1033 | 698 ? | |||||
AS SSD | -22% | 38% | -37% | -19% | 4% | ||
Seq Read | 1707 | 1336 -22% | 1939 14% | 1039 -39% | 1881 10% | 1323 ? -22% | |
Seq Write | 510 | 653 28% | 1380 171% | 310.1 -39% | 703 38% | 697 ? 37% | |
4K Read | 38.77 | 26.65 -31% | 41.38 7% | 76 96% | 52.3 35% | 40.4 ? 4% | |
4K Write | 100.9 | 52.7 -48% | 154.9 54% | 118 17% | 154.1 53% | 100.8 ? 0% | |
4K-64 Read | 630 | 644 2% | 970 54% | 371.8 -41% | 1048 66% | 686 ? 9% | |
4K-64 Write | 707 | 482.9 -32% | 990 40% | 469.5 -34% | 703 -1% | 660 ? -7% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.085 | 0.074 13% | 0.055 35% | 0.067 21% | 0.069 19% | 0.06071 ? 29% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.072 -106% | 0.07 -100% | 0.138 -294% | 0.221 -531% | 0.037 ? -6% | |
Score Read | 839 | 804 -4% | 1205 44% | 552 -34% | 1288 54% | 858 ? 2% | |
Score Write | 859 | 601 -30% | 1283 49% | 618 -28% | 927 8% | 830 ? -3% | |
Score Total | 2077 | 1786 -14% | 3083 48% | 1448 -30% | 2826 36% | 2107 ? 1% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2074 | 764 | 1160 | 802 ? | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 630 | 465.8 | 454.7 | 265 ? | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1326 | 764 | 991 | 487 ? | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
17% | -11% /
-13% | 66% /
62% | 4% /
-2% | 23% /
16% | 4% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (10248 - 12259, n=14) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9665 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15476 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6602 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (61.2 - 158.2, n=5) | |
Average of class Convertible (15.5 - 192.8, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
1366x768 med (1/3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (76.5 - 130.9, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average of class Convertible (6.9 - 174.3, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (71.2 - 128, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average of class Convertible (5.5 - 168.7, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (64.4 - 105.6, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 158.3, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 141.5 | 83.2 | 41.5 | 30.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 61.2 | 85.6 | 81.6 | 68.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 83.5 | 57.2 | 51.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB |
Carga |
| 32.4 / 33.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-13.7 °C / -24.6 F).
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.8 / 9.4 / 11.2 Watt |
Carga |
72 / 90 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 29% | 35% | 36% | 20% | -31% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.7 2% | 3.6 25% | 3.5 27% | 3.9 19% | 4.4 8% | 7.75 ? -61% | 5.21 ? -9% |
Idle Average * | 9.4 | 10.6 -13% | 7.5 20% | 5.6 40% | 6.3 33% | 8.7 7% | 11.8 ? -26% | 8.16 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 12.3 -10% | 9.4 16% | 6.5 42% | 6.8 39% | 9.6 14% | 16.6 ? -48% | 11.1 ? 1% |
Load Average * | 72 | 81 -13% | 42 42% | 42.7 41% | 32.6 55% | 44 39% | 75.2 ? -4% | 46.2 ? 36% |
Load Maximum * | 90 | 100.3 -11% | 51 43% | 66.5 26% | 59 34% | 61 32% | 105.5 ? -17% | 67 ? 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97 | 25.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | 16% | 4% | 53% | -7% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 991 | 1469 48% | 1195 21% | 2223 124% | 690 -30% | 1344 ? 36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 396 | 663 67% | 461 16% | 553 40% | 594 50% | 586 48% | 594 ? 50% |
Load | 188 | 190 1% | 95 -49% | 160 -15% | 115 -39% | 114.9 ? -39% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 90 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Esperávamos mais do Surface Book 3
O Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 oferece muitas qualidades para o menor modelo conversível. O acabamento é excelente e a dobradiça também é única em relação ao mecanismo de retenção da tela. Mas também está lentamente se tornando um efeito de hábito, já que praticamente nada mudou no Surface Book. Atualizar o design, portanto, beneficiaria o dispositivo Windows.
O Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 é um dispositivo de alta qualidade, mas seu desempenho não é usado da melhor maneira.
A Microsoft quer incentivar os usuários a comprar o dispositivo com o hardware mais recente. Acima de tudo, a CPU não é mais potente que o modelo anterior e as sobretaxas às vezes pesadas de mais RAM e um SSD maior não fazem a carteira pular de alegria. Portanto, uma compra certamente vale a pena apenas para usuários que gostam especificamente do conceito do Surface Book 3 13.5 e estão dispostos a pagar um preço mais alto por um dispositivo incomum. Os proprietários do modelo anterior só devem pensar em mudar se quiserem usar o desempenho gráfico mais alto. Em termos de desempenho do sistema e duração da bateria, não há valor agregado.
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
- 06/29/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker