Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 820 G3
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 243 cd/m²
Contraste: 407:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.18% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
HP EliteBook 820 G3 1366x768, TN LED | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 1366x768, IPS | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 1920x1080, IPS | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 1920x1080, TN-LED | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 1920x1080, IPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 72% | 14% | 12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.9 | 48.19 24% | 67.9 75% | 44.48 14% | 43.72 12% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 72.6 24% | 98 68% | 66.2 13% | 65.3 12% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.2 | 49.79 24% | 69.8 74% | 45.96 14% | 45.24 13% |
Response Times | 17% | 16% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58 ? | 42.8 ? 26% | 42 ? 28% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 27.2 ? 7% | 28 ? 4% | ||
PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 217 ? | |||
Screen | 48% | 48% | 34% | 41% | |
Brightness middle | 244 | 262 7% | 300 23% | 360 48% | 300 23% |
Brightness | 240 | 251 5% | 280 17% | 330 38% | 298 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 88 5% | 87 4% | 81 -4% | 83 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.26 57% | 0.31 48% | 0.53 12% | 0.33 45% |
Contrast | 407 | 1008 148% | 968 138% | 679 67% | 909 123% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9 | 3.55 61% | 4.9 46% | 5.58 38% | 3.68 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.73 | 5.85 63% | 8.91 43% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.48 | 3.36 65% | 6.69 29% | 3.98 58% | 2.47 74% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.39 92% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 11116 58% | 5985 109% | 6487 100% | 6192 105% | 6310 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.18 | 45.9 23% | 63 69% | 42.2 14% | 41.6 12% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.63 | 98 67% | 64.9 11% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 30% /
39% | 45% /
49% | 24% /
28% | 27% /
34% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.8 ms rise | |
↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3400 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3845 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4581 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -96% | -55% | -60% | -45% | |
Write 4k QD32 | 343.9 | 0.766 -100% | 174.7 -49% | 180 -48% | 266.5 -23% |
Read 4k QD32 | 549 | 1.155 -100% | 227.3 -59% | 214 -61% | 384.3 -30% |
Write 4k | 134.1 | 3.136 -98% | 86.3 -36% | 61 -55% | 136.4 2% |
Read 4k | 51 | 0.497 -99% | 21.17 -58% | 29 -43% | 29.14 -43% |
Write 512 | 811 | 77.1 -90% | 379.9 -53% | 244 -70% | 268.1 -67% |
Read 512 | 1131 | 36.26 -97% | 414.8 -63% | 428 -62% | 445.6 -61% |
Write Seq | 1240 | 110.2 -91% | 423.3 -66% | 244 -80% | 268.3 -78% |
Read Seq | 1255 | 107.9 -91% | 518 -59% | 509 -59% | 523 -58% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1408 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5164 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 711 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 56.9 | 29.8 | 19.1 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 37.5 | 21.5 | 17.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 37 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Behringer ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, HD Graphics 5500 | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -11% | -4% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 29.2 | 29 1% | 31.2 -7% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 29.4 -1% | 31.2 -7% | 29.3 -0% | 29.2 -0% |
Idle Average * | 29.2 | 29.4 -1% | 31.2 -7% | 29.3 -0% | 29.2 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 29.4 -1% | 31.2 -7% | 29.3 -0% | 29.2 -0% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 33.2 7% | 43.3 -22% | 37.9 -6% | 34.7 3% |
Load Maximum * | 37 | 33.2 10% | 43.3 -17% | 42.8 -16% | 35.1 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).
HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, HD Graphics 5500 | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | 10% | -17% | -8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.6 | 45.3 -14% | 40.6 -3% | 46.7 -18% | 43.2 -9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.1 | 48.8 -22% | 37 8% | 56 -40% | 45.1 -12% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.4 | 29.3 -0% | 24.5 17% | 30.1 -2% | 31.2 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.6 | 32.4 -6% | 24.9 19% | 33.2 -8% | 32.5 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
desligado | 0.25 / 0.45 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.4 / 6.2 Watt |
Carga |
27.3 / 39.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 52 Wh | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 46 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -24% | -28% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.6 -3% | 3.2 9% | 4.1 -17% | 3.1 11% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 5.9 -9% | 7.8 -44% | 8.3 -54% | 5.8 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 6.6 -6% | 8.7 -40% | 9.4 -52% | 6.5 -5% |
Load Average * | 27.3 | 28.5 -4% | 42.2 -55% | 31.6 -16% | 30.5 -12% |
Load Maximum * | 39.5 | 36.8 7% | 35.7 10% | 40.4 -2% | 46.3 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 52 Wh | HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 46 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | -8% | -15% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 826 | 795 -4% | 845 2% | 921 12% | |
H.264 | 495 | 386 -22% | 402 -19% | 293 -41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 373 | 396 6% | 345 -8% | 338 -9% | |
Load | 144 | 160 11% | 103 -28% | 97 -33% | |
WiFi | 446 |
Pro
Contra
Que vergonha, HP. O fabricante realmente convence com o EliteBook 820 G3 em alguns aspectos, mas as impressões negativas dominam depois de nossa análise. A maior desvantagem certamente é a tela. É desafortunado que atualmente somente as configurações de gama alta estejam equipadas com tela IPS FHD. Mas as pequenas coisas também são irritantes. Isto inclui os ruídos da ventoinha que já conhecemos do predecessor, barulho da bobina da nossa unidade de teste, bem como os botões ponteiros dedicados que são esponjosos.
Estes problemas comparativamente pequenos nos distraem dos aspectos positivos, porque a HP oferece um chassi muito bom com boa conectividade, capacidade de manutenção e um desempenho muito bom. O aparelho também permanece frio e as durações da bateria são boas. Sem os problemas mencionados (pelo menos a tela TN pode ser evitada), o EliteBook 820 G3 poderia ter sido um subportátil realmente bom. No entanto, temos dificuldade em recomendar o portátil em nossa configuração de teste, para este preço.
O novo EliteBook 820 G3 sofre de alguns pequenos problemas desnecessários. Você deveria obter uma configuração com uma tela FHD-IPS, se possível.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP EliteBook 820 G3
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff