Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 820 G3

Name: HP EliteBook 820 G3
Brand: HP

Decepcionados pela tela. A terceira geração do HP EliteBook 820 é um subportátil compacto com uma tela de 12,5-polegadas, que foi feito para ambientes empresariais. Nossa configuração de teste, no entanto, está desbalanceada, porque além do bom desempenho, você também obtém uma tela TN muito pobre. O barulho da ventoinha também é um problema para o pequeno portátil.

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/25/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 820 G3 (EliteBook 820 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-6300U 2 x 2.4 - 3 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1000 MHz, Memoría: 1064 MHz, 20.19.15.4331, Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, Single-Channel, 1 de 2 slots livres, até 32 GB

Pantalha

12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 125 PPI, LG Philips LGD0498, TN LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Combo audio, Card Reader: Leitor SD (SD, SDHX, SDXC), 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Acelerômetro (disco rígido), Slot SIM

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 311 x 219

Bateria

44 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Webcam 720p HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, áudio da Bang & Olufsen, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU de 45-Watts, folhetos, MS Office (avaliação), Skype, Foxit PhantomPDF, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, diversas ferramentas HP, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

1.281 kg, Suprimento de energia: 306 g

Preço

1650 Euro

Links

HP página inicial
EliteBook 820 (Serie)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Right: USB 3.1 Type-C (gen. 1), DisplayPort, headset, USB 3.0, Ethernet, docking, SIM slot, power

Left: Kensington lock, VGA; USB 3.0, SmartCard reader


262 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	235 cd/m²
242 cd/m²	244 cd/m²	232 cd/m²
221 cd/m²	226 cd/m²	230 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD0498 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 264 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 239.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 243 cd/m²
Contraste: 407:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.18% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 1366x768, TN LED	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 1366x768, IPS	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 1920x1080, IPS	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 1920x1080, TN-LED	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 1920x1080, IPS
Display		24%	72%	14%	12%
Display P3 Coverage	38.9	48.19 24%	67.9 75%	44.48 14%	43.72 12%
sRGB Coverage	58.5	72.6 24%	98 68%	66.2 13%	65.3 12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.2	49.79 24%	69.8 74%	45.96 14%	45.24 13%
Response Times		17%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	58 ?(24.8, 33.2)	42.8 ?(18.8, 24) 26%	42 ?(18, 24) 28%
Response Time Black / White *	29.2 ?(12, 17.2)	27.2 ?(12.4, 14.8) 7%	28 ?(7, 21) 4%
PWM Frequency		220 ?(90)	217 ?(40)
Screen		48%	48%	34%	41%
Brightness middle	244	262 7%	300 23%	360 48%	300 23%
Brightness	240	251 5%	280 17%	330 38%	298 24%
Brightness Distribution	84	88 5%	87 4%	81 -4%	83 -1%
Black Level *	0.6	0.26 57%	0.31 48%	0.53 12%	0.33 45%
Contrast	407	1008 148%	968 138%	679 67%	909 123%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9	3.55 61%	4.9 46%	5.58 38%	3.68 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.73	5.85 63%	8.91 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.48	3.36 65%	6.69 29%	3.98 58%	2.47 74%
Gamma	2.44 ^90%	2.39 ^92%	2.33 ^94%	2.21 ^100%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	11116 ^58%	5985 ^109%	6487 ^100%	6192 ^105%	6310 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.18	45.9 23%	63 69%	42.2 14%	41.6 12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58.63		98 67%		64.9 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		30% / 39%	45% / 49%	24% / 28%	27% / 34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24.8 ms rise
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	311 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points -7%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel Core i7-6500U	288 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel Core i5-5300U	264 Points -15%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel Core i7-5500U	287 Points -8%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	123 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	112 Points -9%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel Core i7-6500U	84 Points -32%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel Core i5-5300U	114 Points -7%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel Core i7-5500U	123 Points 0%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

123 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

311 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

35.47 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3400 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3845 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4581 pontos
Ajuda

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 8192	3400 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, 4096	3262 Points -4%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY, 16384	3271 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP, 8192	2772 Points -18%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP, 8192	2987 Points -12%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 8192	3845 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, 4096	3735 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP, 8192	3052 Points -21%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP, 8192	3306 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 8192	4581 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, 4096	4335 Points -5%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP, 8192	4133 Points -10%

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-96%	-55%	-60%	-45%
Write 4k QD32	343.9	0.766 -100%	174.7 -49%	180 -48%	266.5 -23%
Read 4k QD32	549	1.155 -100%	227.3 -59%	214 -61%	384.3 -30%
Write 4k	134.1	3.136 -98%	86.3 -36%	61 -55%	136.4 2%
Read 4k	51	0.497 -99%	21.17 -58%	29 -43%	29.14 -43%
Write 512	811	77.1 -90%	379.9 -53%	244 -70%	268.1 -67%
Read 512	1131	36.26 -97%	414.8 -63%	428 -62%	445.6 -61%
Write Seq	1240	110.2 -91%	423.3 -66%	244 -80%	268.3 -78%
Read Seq	1255	107.9 -91%	518 -59%	509 -59%	523 -58%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1255 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1240 MB/s

512K Read: 1131 MB/s

512K Write: 811 MB/s

4K Read: 51 MB/s

4K Write: 134.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 549 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 343.9 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		1408 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5164 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		711 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	1408 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	1332 Points -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel HD Graphics 520	1559 Points +11%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	927 Points -34%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	1059 Points -25%
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	1280 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	1210 Points -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel HD Graphics 520	1377 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	911 Points -29%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	953 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	5164 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	4938 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	4633 Points -10%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	4806 Points -7%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	6131 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	5978 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	5246 Points -14%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	5514 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	711 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	688 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	599 Points -16%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	619 Points -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value)
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	755 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520	727 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Intel HD Graphics 5500	642 Points -15%
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA Intel HD Graphics 5500	658 Points -13%

	baixo	média	alto
Tomb Raider (2013)	56.9	29.8	19.1
BioShock Infinite (2013)	37.5	21.5	17.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.8

Barulho

Ocioso		29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB
Carga		35.6 / 37 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Behringer ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, HD Graphics 5500	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, HD Graphics 5500
Noise		3%	-11%	-4%	2%
off / environment *	29.2	29 1%	31.2 -7%
Idle Minimum *	29.2	29.4 -1%	31.2 -7%	29.3 -0%	29.2 -0%
Idle Average *	29.2	29.4 -1%	31.2 -7%	29.3 -0%	29.2 -0%
Idle Maximum *	29.2	29.4 -1%	31.2 -7%	29.3 -0%	29.2 -0%
Load Average *	35.6	33.2 7%	43.3 -22%	37.9 -6%	34.7 3%
Load Maximum *	37	33.2 10%	43.3 -17%	42.8 -16%	35.1 5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.6 °C	37.2 °C	30.8 °C
35.8 °C	33.7 °C	29.7 °C
29.9 °C	27.6 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C


32.5 °C	40.1 °C	35.6 °C
32 °C	38.2 °C	38.6 °C
30 °C	31.6 °C	32.4 °C

Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 5300U, HD Graphics 5500	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 5500U, HD Graphics 5500
Heat		-11%	10%	-17%	-8%
Maximum Upper Side *	39.6	45.3 -14%	40.6 -3%	46.7 -18%	43.2 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	40.1	48.8 -22%	37 8%	56 -40%	45.1 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	29.4	29.3 -0%	24.5 17%	30.1 -2%	31.2 -6%
Idle Bottom *	30.6	32.4 -6%	24.9 19%	33.2 -8%	32.5 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.25 / 0.45 Watt
Ocioso	3.5 / 5.4 / 6.2 Watt
Carga	27.3 / 39.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 52 Wh	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 46 Wh
Power Consumption		-3%	-24%	-28%	-6%
Idle Minimum *	3.5	3.6 -3%	3.2 9%	4.1 -17%	3.1 11%
Idle Average *	5.4	5.9 -9%	7.8 -44%	8.3 -54%	5.8 -7%
Idle Maximum *	6.2	6.6 -6%	8.7 -40%	9.4 -52%	6.5 -5%
Load Average *	27.3	28.5 -4%	42.2 -55%	31.6 -16%	30.5 -12%
Load Maximum *	39.5	36.8 7%	35.7 10%	40.4 -2%	46.3 -17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		13h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 24min

	HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 E7250 52 Wh	HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 46 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-8%	-15%	-18%
Reader / Idle	826	795 -4%		845 2%	921 12%
H.264	495	386 -22%		402 -19%	293 -41%
WiFi v1.3	373	396 6%	345 -8%		338 -9%
Load	144	160 11%		103 -28%	97 -33%
WiFi				446

Pro

+ Carcaça sólida com boa qualidade de construção

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Wi-Fi muito veloz

+ Boa capacidade de manutenção

+ Muito bom desempenho do sistema

+ 3 anos de garantia

Contra

- Tela TN ruim com ângulos de visão limitados

- Bobina barulhenta da nossa unidade de teste

- Ventoinha zumbidora

- Botões esponjosos

- Caro

In review: HP EliteBook 820 G3. Test model courtesy of HP Germany.

Que vergonha, HP. O fabricante realmente convence com o EliteBook 820 G3 em alguns aspectos, mas as impressões negativas dominam depois de nossa análise. A maior desvantagem certamente é a tela. É desafortunado que atualmente somente as configurações de gama alta estejam equipadas com tela IPS FHD. Mas as pequenas coisas também são irritantes. Isto inclui os ruídos da ventoinha que já conhecemos do predecessor, barulho da bobina da nossa unidade de teste, bem como os botões ponteiros dedicados que são esponjosos.

Estes problemas comparativamente pequenos nos distraem dos aspectos positivos, porque a HP oferece um chassi muito bom com boa conectividade, capacidade de manutenção e um desempenho muito bom. O aparelho também permanece frio e as durações da bateria são boas. Sem os problemas mencionados (pelo menos a tela TN pode ser evitada), o EliteBook 820 G3 poderia ter sido um subportátil realmente bom. No entanto, temos dificuldade em recomendar o portátil em nossa configuração de teste, para este preço.

O novo EliteBook 820 G3 sofre de alguns pequenos problemas desnecessários. Você deveria obter uma configuração com uma tela FHD-IPS, se possível.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

HP EliteBook 820 G3 - 2016-04-18 04/18/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

91 / 98 → 93%

Teclado

87%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

64 / 80 → 80%

Peso

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

76%

Desempenho do jogos

54 / 68 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

87 / 87 → 100%

Temperatura

92 / 91 → 100%

Ruído

91%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

76%

85%

Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 820 G3

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-04-25 (Update: 2016-04-25)