Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 725 G3
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 239 cd/m²
Contraste: 446:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.12% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA TN LED, 1366x768 | HP EliteBook 725 G2 TN-Panel, 1366x768 | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 TN, 1366x768 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE IPS, 1366x768 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 IPS, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 820 G3 TN LED, 1366x768 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -14% | -17% | 2% | 46% | -17% | 39% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 47.15 | 40.56 -14% | 39.06 -17% | 48.19 2% | 72.3 53% | 38.9 -17% | 66.8 42% |
sRGB Coverage | 71 | 61 -14% | 58.7 -17% | 72.6 2% | 93.8 32% | 58.5 -18% | 95.4 34% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 48.71 | 41.92 -14% | 40.36 -17% | 49.79 2% | 73.8 52% | 40.2 -17% | 68 40% |
Response Times | 5% | 1% | -19% | -5% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 45.2 ? 10% | 42.8 ? 14% | 58 ? -16% | 41.2 ? 18% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 24 ? -0% | 27.2 ? -13% | 29.2 ? -22% | 30.4 ? -27% | ||
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 220 ? | |||||
Screen | -30% | -11% | 42% | 63% | -8% | 51% | |
Brightness middle | 241 | 188 -22% | 161 -33% | 262 9% | 367.1 52% | 244 1% | 387 61% |
Brightness | 240 | 186 -22% | 152 -37% | 251 5% | 341 42% | 240 0% | 358 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 91 10% | 90 8% | 88 6% | 85 2% | 84 1% | 88 6% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.86 -59% | 0.29 46% | 0.26 52% | 0.3 44% | 0.6 -11% | 0.47 13% |
Contrast | 446 | 219 -51% | 555 24% | 1008 126% | 1224 174% | 407 -9% | 823 85% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.04 | 12.31 -53% | 10.31 -28% | 3.55 56% | 9 -12% | 1.6 80% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.9 | 18.58 -34% | 5.85 58% | 15.73 -13% | 4 71% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.52 | 12.56 -32% | 11.3 -19% | 3.36 65% | 9.48 -0% | 1 89% | |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 1.86 118% | 2.57 86% | 2.39 92% | 2.44 90% | 2.26 97% | |
CCT | 11362 57% | 12047 54% | 13574 48% | 5985 109% | 11116 58% | 6680 97% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 45.03 | 38.6 -14% | 37.32 -17% | 45.9 2% | 37.18 -17% | 61.6 37% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 71.12 | 58.82 -17% | 58.63 -18% | 82.2 16% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-26% | -8% /
-10% | 15% /
28% | 55% /
56% | -15% /
-11% | 28% /
41% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 2331 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2706 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2710 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3691 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP EliteBook 725 G2 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -11% | -26% | 18% | 13315% | 9582% | |
Read Seq | 125.3 | 116.8 -7% | 113.8 -9% | 107.9 -14% | 1255 902% | 754 502% |
Write Seq | 124.3 | 115.6 -7% | 108.5 -13% | 110.2 -11% | 1240 898% | 638 413% |
Read 512 | 40.95 | 39.14 -4% | 24.9 -39% | 36.26 -11% | 1131 2662% | 616 1404% |
Write 512 | 57.6 | 49.61 -14% | 51.9 -10% | 77.1 34% | 811 1308% | 678 1077% |
Read 4k | 0.495 | 0.453 -8% | 0.398 -20% | 0.497 0% | 51 10203% | 14.6 2849% |
Write 4k | 1.13 | 0.947 -16% | 0.654 -42% | 3.136 178% | 134.1 11767% | 20.5 1714% |
Read 4k QD32 | 1.129 | 1.019 -10% | 0.798 -29% | 1.155 2% | 549 48527% | 464 40998% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.133 | 0.931 -18% | 0.636 -44% | 0.766 -32% | 343.9 30253% | 315 27702% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5207 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1424 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 34816 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3524 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 690 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 300 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G3 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 49.5 | 25.2 | 18.5 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.7 | 24.1 | 19.4 | |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 21.7 | 14.4 | 8.4 | |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 10 | 7 | ||
The Division (2016) | 12.3 | 7.5 | ||
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 6.1 | 3.9 | ||
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 11.1 | 10.4 | ||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 6 | 2.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
HDD |
| 30.9 dB |
Carga |
| 38.2 / 38.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.65 / 0.71 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.4 / 7.5 / 13 Watt |
Carga |
41.2 / 44.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | HP EliteBook 725 G2 A10 Pro-7350B, Radeon R6 (Kaveri) | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 27% | 30% | 19% | 32% | 52% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 7 -30% | 3.9 28% | 3.6 33% | 2.7 50% | 3.5 35% | 2.7 50% |
Idle Average * | 7.5 | 8.6 -15% | 6 20% | 5.9 21% | 7.7 -3% | 5.4 28% | 2.7 64% |
Idle Maximum * | 13 | 9.9 24% | 6.6 49% | 6.6 49% | 11 15% | 6.2 52% | 7.2 45% |
Load Average * | 41.2 | 24.4 41% | 28.9 30% | 28.5 31% | 34.8 16% | 27.3 34% | 22 47% |
Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 32.5 27% | 41.7 7% | 36.8 18% | 36.6 18% | 39.5 12% | 20.5 54% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA 44 Wh | HP EliteBook 725 G2 46 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 47 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 52 Wh | HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 43% | 57% | 105% | 62% | 118% | |
Reader / Idle | 553 | 456 -18% | 772 40% | 795 44% | 1134 105% | 826 49% | |
H.264 | 258 | 205 -21% | 353 37% | 386 50% | 495 92% | 512 98% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 281 | 398 42% | 396 41% | 373 33% | 501 78% | ||
Load | 83 | 110 33% | 128 54% | 160 93% | 144 73% | 231 178% | |
WiFi | 258 | 402 |
Pro
Contra
O Hewlett Packard EliteBook 725 G3 é um subportátil de 12,5-polegadas. A APU AMD deste modelo oferece suficiente desempenho para tarefas cotidianas. O portátil tem uma boa carcaça e oferece uma boa conectividade. O teclado também é bastante bom. O portátil tem uma opção de incluir um modem LTE e as antenas necessárias e slot SIM já estão disponíveis. A HP oferece uma garantia de 3-anos.
Existem muitos aspectos desde modelo de teste que podem ser criticados. O portátil funciona silenciosamente apenas quando está no modo inativo. Se a ventoinha começa a funcionar, o aparelho se tornará barulhento, devido a um perturbante zumbido que é emitido. Isto, combinado com o preço do aparelho, é suficiente para desqualifica-lo de ser um portátil empresarial viável. O EliteBook 725 G2 tinha uma escotilha de manutenção que podia ser aberta sem ferramentas. Seu sucessor, o EliteBook 725 G3, possui uma placa inferior que utiliza parafusos. Para ser justos, temos de admitir que o aparelho pode ser desmontado facilmente com uma chave de fenda, mas mesmo assim, este seria um passo para trás.
A duração da bateria não é muito boa. O portátil de 12,5-polegadas deveria oferecer durações mais longas e é ultrapassado pelo EliteBook 820 G3 e o Lenovo ThinkPad X260. A tela é pobre para o preço que o comprador está pagando. Ela tem brilho baixo, contraste e ângulos de visão pobres e uma resolução HD.
O EliteBook 725 G3 terá dificuldade sobrevivendo no catálogo empresarial da HP. Nem o hardware, nem o preço fazem com que este portátil seja algo especial.
Para resumir, não podemos encontrar um motivo válido para recomendar o EliteBook 725 G3. Inclusive se o preço fosse rebaixado, a duração da bateria simplesmente não corresponde aos padrões modernos para esta classe. Além disso, os compradores sempre tem a opção de um EliteBook 820 G3 (T9X40ET), que é mais barato que o nosso modelo de teste e tem um processador Core i5-6200U. Os recursos restantes deste modelo são similares a aqueles do nosso modelo de teste, o 725 G3. Com um preço de 920 Euros (~$1043), o modelo irmão é 80 Euros (~$91) mais barato que o nosso modelo de teste, o 725 G3.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês.
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA
- 08/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck