Breve Análise do Subportátil Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1122:1 (Preto: 0.289 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.89 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.36% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13-9350 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 13.3", 2560x1440 | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 13.5", 3000x2000 | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13.3", 3200x1800 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -29% | 3% | 5% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 44.53 -31% | 66.8 4% | 67 4% | |
sRGB Coverage | 90.4 | 66.8 -26% | 92.8 3% | 95.8 6% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 45.97 -30% | 67.3 3% | 68.9 5% | |
Response Times | 30% | -31% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 24 ? 36% | 48.4 ? -29% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 19 ? 23% | 32.8 ? -32% | ||
PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | ||||
Screen | 4% | 3% | 30% | -23% | |
Brightness middle | 324.3 | 277.5 -14% | 324 0% | 430.9 33% | 287 -12% |
Brightness | 314 | 276 -12% | 324 3% | 410 31% | 280 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 88 -5% | 90 -3% | 93 0% | 88 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.289 | 0.191 34% | 0.34 -18% | 0.254 12% | 0.792 -174% |
Contrast | 1122 | 1453 30% | 953 -15% | 1696 51% | 362 -68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.03 | 4.88 19% | 4.36 28% | 2.06 66% | 3.08 49% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.89 | 4.26 46% | 4.62 41% | 2.22 72% | 3.36 57% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.59 85% | 2.18 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 6490 100% | 6562 99% | 6857 95% | 6520 100% | 6087 107% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.46 | 41.6 -36% | 60 -8% | 64 -2% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.36 | 65.79 -27% | 93 3% | 96 6% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-4% | 12% /
7% | 1% /
16% | -23% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
≤ 78 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % (78 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 |
wPrime 2.10 | |
1024m (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
32m (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro |
PCMark 7 Score | 4635 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2833 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3241 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3657 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H | |
Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1151 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37002 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3778 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 596 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anno 2070 (2011) | 47.3 | 33.2 | 19.2 | 9.6 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4.1 °C / 7.3 F).
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 45 Wh | Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H 45 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9350 56 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 56 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 69 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 44 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -13% | 31% | -11% | -7% | -34% | |
Reader / Idle | 1052 | 781 -26% | 782 -26% | 791 -25% | 1070 2% | 635 -40% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 382 | 451 18% | 500 31% | 488 28% | 402 5% | ||
Load | 215 | 189 -12% | 150 -30% | 138 -36% | 153 -29% | 155 -28% | |
WiFi | 408 | 379 |
Pro
Contra
Considerando tudo, o UX305CA não é tão diferente do predecessor Zenbook UX305FA-FB003H. É claro que isso não é necessariamente algo ruim - depois de tudo: onde mais você pode obter um chassi monobloco de alumínio, processador Core M, 8 GB de RAM, um SSD 256 GB, uma muito boa tela de 1080p e bons dispositivos de entrada, por apenas $700? Conformado, o UX305CA não é um dos sistemas mais velozes - especialmente porque a Asus utiliza técnicas de afogamento muito agressivas - portanto, os usuários exigentes precisam procurar outra coisa. O subportátil de 13,3-polegadas pode lidar facilmente com o processamento de textos, navegação pela web e tarefas similares e o faz sem esquentar ou emitir ruídos. É uma pena que a duração da bateria seja tão curta, de outra maneira este sistema seria o companheiro perfeito para viagens. No topo da nossa lista de desejos: um teclado iluminado.
Para o preço, o UX305CA-EHM1 é difícil de derrotar: ele é extremamente fino, muito leve e bem executado. Pode não atrair a todos, mas certamente vale a pena considerá-lo para aqueles que procuram um ultra portável de gama alta
O Dell XPS 13 (a versão não-touch) com tela de 1080p também é uma boa alternativa, mas custa cerca de $50 a mais e vem com apenas 4 GB de RAM e um SSD de 128 GB.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
-
11/24/2015 v4 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner