Breve Análise do Subportátil Asus ZenBook 3 Deluxe UX490UA (i5-7200U, SSD de 256 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Huawei MateBook X |
|
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 337 cd/m²
Contraste: 1605:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA AU Optronics AUO383D / B140HAN03.8, , 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U937 Sharp SHP1483, LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 16% | 10% | 12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 58.7 | 68.6 17% | 65.4 11% | 65.8 12% |
sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 98 13% | 93.1 7% | 96.2 11% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 59.9 | 70.4 18% | 66.4 11% | 66.8 12% |
Response Times | -17% | -2% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24 ? | 39.2 ? -63% | 22.4 ? 7% | 33 ? -38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 20 ? 29% | 31.2 ? -11% | 24 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | 211.9 ? | |||
Screen | -1% | -3% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 337 | 353 5% | 338 0% | 408 21% |
Brightness | 295 | 347 18% | 321 9% | 395 34% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 81 0% | 90 11% | 88 9% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.33 -57% | 0.35 -67% | 0.45 -114% |
Contrast | 1605 | 1070 -33% | 966 -40% | 907 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.89 | 3.5 28% | 4.2 14% | 1.55 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.43 | 6.9 18% | 6.5 23% | 2.19 74% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 4.9 -14% | 3.9 9% | 1.91 55% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 7352 88% | 7136 91% | 7144 91% | 6491 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 63.5 13% | 60.4 8% | 61 9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 98.1 13% | 93.1 7% | 96 10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
0% | 2% /
-0% | 4% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3632 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4695 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3425 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Fujitsu LifeBook U937 Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 15% | -2% | 29% | |
Read Seq | 435.3 | 509 17% | 430.6 -1% | 741 70% |
Write Seq | 413.3 | 462.3 12% | 424.1 3% | 461.2 12% |
Read 512 | 325.9 | 385.1 18% | 275 -16% | 504 55% |
Write 512 | 357 | 228.5 -36% | 369.8 4% | 310.3 -13% |
Read 4k | 26.28 | 34.85 33% | 28.04 7% | 29.48 12% |
Write 4k | 85.6 | 90.5 6% | 53.5 -37% | 68.1 -20% |
Read 4k QD32 | 246.7 | 392.8 59% | 322.9 31% | 498.9 102% |
Write 4k QD32 | 224.4 | 253.6 13% | 211.9 -6% | 257.5 15% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 | |
Huawei MateBook X |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1781 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6056 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 934 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.3 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.4 | |||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 48.6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 31.2 dB |
Carga |
| 35.7 / 34.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.8 F).
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Fujitsu LifeBook U937 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.45 / 0.46 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.3 / 6.1 / 10.1 Watt |
Carga |
24.6 / 22 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U937 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -31% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.11 6% | 2.7 18% | 4.6 -39% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 6.1 -0% | 5.3 13% | 11 -80% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 6.75 33% | 6.2 39% | 12 -19% |
Load Average * | 24.6 | 28.9 -17% | 37.6 -53% | 39.5 -61% |
Load Maximum * | 22 | 33.3 -51% | 60.1 -173% | 34.6 -57% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U937 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 11% | -1% | -28% | |
Reader / Idle | 1032 | 1152 12% | 1321 28% | 512 -50% |
WiFi v1.3 | 562 | 654 16% | 504 -10% | 337 -40% |
Load | 153 | 161 5% | 120 -22% | 162 6% |
H.264 | 714 | 576 |
Pro
Contra
Se você leu a análise completa, certamente concordará que, neste momento, ainda não podemos publicar pontuações finais para o ZenBook 3 Deluxe e desativamos nosso widget de pontuação em concordância. Se os erros constantes acabarem por ser uma questão sistemática, que não assumimos neste momento, isso reduziria a pontuação do ZenBook drasticamente.
A carcaça muito compacta, elegante e bem feita é praticamente impecável, salvo pelo ângulo de abertura comparativamente estreito que se tornou um problema durante o teste uma e outra vez. A seleção de portas do portátil é certamente futurista e ainda bastante incomum, e exigirá o uso de dongles por enquanto. O Windows 10 Professional com suporte para Bitlocker não foi pré-carregado em nossa unidade de teste, mas está disponível para completar o equipamento de segurança TPM 2.0 e leitor de digitais do portátil . Ficamos particularmente impressionados com a operação muito silenciosa e eficiente em termos de energia e a duração da bateria mais do que decente do portátil.
O restante da nossa crítica é direcionada exclusivamente à tela, em geral, aceitável. Dado que não é uma tela sensível ao toque, a camada protetora adicional do Gorilla Glass é quase inútil - preferiríamos um painel fosco. Talvez a Asus se sentiu "inspirada" pelo MacBook Air. Afinal, a Apple foi impossível dissuadir no uso de telas refletivas em todos os seus produtos há anos. Além disso, a tela não foi feita para a edição de fotos, dado a sua cobertura de espaço de cores inabalável.
Se o ZenBook 3 Deluxe receberá uma recomendação de compra ou não, depende da forma como a segunda unidade de teste se comportará.