Breve Análise do Subportátil Acer Aspire V3-372
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK (Aspire V3 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, DDR3, 10.18.15.4279
Memória
8 GB
, DDR3 1600 MHz, dual-channel, 2 de 4 bancos de memória ocupados
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU, 256 GB
peso
1.55 kg, Suprimento de energia: 154 g
Preço
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 261 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 246.7 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 250 cd/m²
Contraste: 581:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.18 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.05% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 60% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.05 | 64.5 65% | 35.87 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.7 | 90.4 54% | 54 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.35 | 65.5 62% | 37.06 -8% |
| Response Times | 8% | -28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 37.6 ? 18% | 54.4 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 24.8 ? -3% | 32.8 ? -37% |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 192 ? | |
| Screen | 16% | -72% | |
| Brightness middle | 250 | 324.3 30% | 212 -15% |
| Brightness | 247 | 314 27% | 205 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 93 7% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.289 33% | 0.71 -65% |
| Contrast | 581 | 1122 93% | 299 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 6.03 -34% | 12.06 -167% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 7.89 -148% | 13.41 -322% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 6743 96% | 6490 100% | 15382 42% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 65.46 77% | 34.3 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 90.36 56% | 54.2 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 28% /
24% | -36% /
-52% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5197 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3209 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4155 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
Sequential Read:
522 MB/s
Sequential Write:
447.4 MB/s
512K Read:
392.3 MB/s
512K Write:
388 MB/s
4K Read:
21.1 MB/s
4K Write:
71.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
248 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
212.9 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1487 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 56687 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5833 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 28.7 | 22.6 | 14.4 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 39.8 | 28.2 | 18.6 | 5.6 |
| Thief (2014) | 24.8 | 14.2 | 11.7 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 29.8 | 19 | 10 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12 | 8.1 | ||
| Mad Max (2015) | 20.5 | 10 | ||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 32.2 | 16.2 | 6.4 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 32.6 | 19.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.4 / 32.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) | ||
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 28% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49.3 | 34.6 30% | 42.1 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53.3 | 35.2 34% | 44.1 17% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 22.6 20% | 31.1 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32.6 | 23.4 28% | 32.9 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 5.8 / 8.1 Watt |
| Carga |
30.2 / 32.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 906 | 1052 16% | 449 -50% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 349 | 382 9% | 377 8% |
| Load | 135 | 215 59% | 118 -13% |
Pro
+ Design surpreendente e fino
+ Sólido e muito bem construído
+ USB Tipo C
+ Muito boa precisão das cores e estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
+ Sem PWM
+ Perfeita utilização do Turbo
+ Extremamente silencioso
+ Ótimo som para condições de portátil
Contra
- Impressões muito notórias em algumas partes
- Dobradiças não ideais
- Poucas interfaces
- Sem opção de manutenção ou troca da bateria sem desmontagem
- Teclado abaixo da média, barra de espaço defeituosa
- ClickPad e teclado com falhas de fabricação
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Consumo muito alto no estado de standby
Opções de manutenção pouco satisfatórias ainda podem ser aceitas em um subportátil sem uma placa de vídeo dedicada. No entanto, a Acer não acertou com o teclado de aparência barata. O teclado não seria mais que bom, nem mesmo com uma barra de espaço funcional e apenas justifica o preço do portátil. Pode se tornar muito irritante que as dobradiças nem sempre seguram a tampa com segurança em sua posição quando estiver em movimento. A tela não deixa a melhor impressão para as condições de IPSe também poderia ter sido um pouco mais brilhante. No entanto, o testador lidou bem com isso e não há muito mais do que reclamar.
Além do desempenho idealmente utilizado, principalmente o case robusto construído de forma impecável, o som surpreendentemente bom, a muito longa duração da bateria, e a operação extremamente silenciosa e quase inaudível, estão no lado dos pros. Essa é quase a única vantagem, em vista da CPU utilizada.
Se a Acer tivesse instalado um teclado e uma tela um pouco melhores, o Aspire V3-372-50LK teria recebido nossa recomendação de compra.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
- 12/22/2015 v4 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
