Breve Análise do Subportátil ASUS ZenBook UX3430UN (i5-8250U, MX150, 256 GB SSD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 377 cd/m²
Contraste: 943:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.89 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 SHP1484, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -1% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 68.9 5% | 65.8 0% | 67.1 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 96.6 -1% | 96.2 -1% | 98.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.8 | 69.6 3% | 66.8 -1% | 69.3 2% |
| Response Times | -95% | -3% | -23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 62.4 ? -108% | 33 ? -10% | 40 ? -33% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 45.6 ? -82% | 24 ? 4% | 28 ? -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 1008 ? | |||
| Screen | 16% | 21% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 377 | 428 14% | 408 8% | 353 -6% |
| Brightness | 339 | 405 19% | 395 17% | 366 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 76 | 87 14% | 88 16% | 88 16% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.26 35% | 0.45 -13% | 0.34 15% |
| Contrast | 943 | 1646 75% | 907 -4% | 1038 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.33 | 3.8 -14% | 1.55 53% | 2.88 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.02 | 7.2 10% | 2.19 73% | 6.61 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.5 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.89 | 4.4 10% | 1.91 61% | 4.24 13% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.21 100% | 2.34 94% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 7620 85% | 7067 92% | 6491 100% | 7380 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62.8 1% | 61 -2% | 64 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 96.4 -2% | 96 -2% | 99 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-1% | 6% /
13% | -4% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3672 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4613 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3569 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Average SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 92% | 37% | 18% | 0% | |
| Read Seq | 480.3 | 1875 290% | 741 54% | 500 4% | 482 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 263.9 | 352.7 34% | 461.2 75% | 457.4 73% | 246 ? -7% |
| Read 512 | 266.9 | 840 215% | 504 89% | 345.6 29% | 328 ? 23% |
| Write 512 | 263.2 | 353.9 34% | 310.3 18% | 415 58% | 243 ? -8% |
| Read 4k | 29.58 | 34.18 16% | 29.48 0% | 28.34 -4% | 28 ? -5% |
| Write 4k | 68.4 | 127.5 86% | 68.1 0% | 56.8 -17% | 74.8 ? 9% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 322.2 | 381.8 18% | 498.9 55% | 311.3 -3% | 323 ? 0% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 243.3 | 339.9 40% | 257.5 6% | 251.1 3% | 220 ? -10% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4459 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13630 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3081 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 69.7 | 37.9 | 18.3 | |
| For Honor (2017) | 73.3 | 28.6 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 15 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 33.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.5 / 7.8 / 8.1 Watt |
| Carga |
52 / 59 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 26% | -5% | 26% | -7% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 3.14 30% | 4.6 -2% | 2.6 42% | 4.48 ? -0% | 4.44 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 7.8 | 5.22 33% | 11 -41% | 5.9 24% | 7.88 ? -1% | 7.55 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 6 26% | 12 -48% | 6.25 23% | 9.76 ? -20% | 9.45 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 52 | 38.5 26% | 39.5 24% | 42 19% | 54.7 ? -5% | 45.8 ? 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 59 | 50.4 15% | 34.6 41% | 46 22% | 63.5 ? -8% | 68.4 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 50 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | -15% | -2% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1367 | 1417 4% | 512 -63% | 1292 -5% | 1750 ? 28% |
| H.264 | 505 | 831 65% | 911 ? 80% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 485 | 644 33% | 337 -31% | 527 9% | 726 ? 50% |
| Load | 108 | 119 10% | 162 50% | 97 -10% | 115.4 ? 7% |
Pro
Contra
O ASUS ZenBook UX3430UN consegue atingir o equilíbrio entre ser um subportátil de escritório móvel e uma máquina de jogos ocasional com apenas uma pequena redução no desempenho.
Embora o novo ZenBook UX3430UN não pertença necessariamente à mesma categoria que outros dispositivos finos e leves de 14 polegadas, você não precisa se preocupar com ventoinhas barulhentos ou superaquecimento. O ZenBook UX3430UN é um dispositivo silencioso e frio para o qual também apreciamos sua carcaça simples e solidamente construída.
Além da operação silenciosa, a ASUS equipou um dispositivo com bons dispositivos de entrada e recursos sólidos de segurança, todos importantes para os usuários do escritório. Em termos de duração da bateria e nosso teste prático de Wi-Fi, teríamos preferido dez horas em vez de oito. Além disso, embora a tela seja boa, algumas coisas impedem que ela seja adequada para o processamento profissional de imagens. Os outros pontos negativos são insignificantes, o que se reflete na ótima classificação geral de 88/100.
O ASUS ZenBook UX3430UN é um dispositivo que nós recomendamos totalmente, e especialmente sobre o mais antigo ZenBook UX3430UQ. O novo ZenBook UX3430UN traz um hardware consideravelmente mais potente com quase nenhum inconveniente.
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
- 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
