Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Blade V8
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 753:1 (Preto: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.13
| ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 Mini AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | -7% | -47% | -58% | |
| Brightness middle | 482 | 505 5% | 547 13% | 327 -32% | 409 -15% |
| Brightness | 448 | 468 4% | 540 21% | 335 -25% | 411 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 88 11% | 94 19% | 94 19% | 96 22% |
| Black Level * | 0.64 | 0.74 -16% | 0.57 11% | 0.38 41% | |
| Contrast | 753 | 682 -9% | 960 27% | 1076 43% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.1 -3% | 5.1 -28% | 6.3 -58% | 9.4 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 5.8 11% | 9.1 -40% | 11.4 -75% | 17.6 -171% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 4.9 -44% | 6.2 -82% | 7.1 -109% | 11.6 -241% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.5 88% | 2.09 105% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6774 96% | 7116 91% | 6546 99% | 7637 85% | 9597 68% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5435 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 5435 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 5435 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| ZTE Blade V8 | Huawei P9 Lite | Honor 6X | ZTE Axon 7 Mini | ZTE Blade V7 | Wiko U Feel Prime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -22% | 24% | -23% | -47% | -5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 278.1 | 283.5 2% | 283.4 2% | 230.8 -17% | 196.8 -29% | 270.9 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.7 | 46.24 -40% | 73.8 -5% | 122.8 58% | 39.45 -49% | 137.3 77% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.89 | 38.22 -4% | 39.55 -1% | 14.05 -65% | 28.07 -30% | 55 38% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.69 | 15.35 21% | 45.05 255% | 6.7 -47% | 7.58 -40% | 9.4 -26% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 96.5 | 60.8 -37% | 52 -46% | 73.9 -23% | 43.67 -55% | 41.98 -56% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 87.1 | 25.1 -71% | 34.53 -60% | 50.3 -42% | 20.89 -76% | 35.21 -60% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 19 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 6X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.07 / 0.49 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.98 / 1.76 / 1.79 Watt |
| Carga |
2.89 / 5.62 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 7% | 65% | -16% | -26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 964 | 1404 46% | 2250 133% | 1287 34% | |
| H.264 | 545 | 568 4% | 885 62% | 435 -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 700 | 604 -14% | 957 37% | 399 -43% | 519 -26% |
| Load | 297 | 272 -8% | 375 26% | 196 -34% |
Pro
Contra
No final deste teste, surge a questão sobre para quem é este aparelho. Principalmente para os caçadores de pechinchas que querem um monte de recursos por pouco dinheiro. Esses compradores recebem uma câmera dupla e uma câmera frontal de 13 megapixels. Suporte para áudio Dolby está disponível para os alto falantes. Uma boa duração da bateria, boa tela e expansão de armazenamento via micro-SD também pertence ao pacote.
O Blade V8 é um smartphone que traz bom desempenho para a gama média a um preço baixo.
E o ruim? Os compradores devem estar cientes de que este não é um smartphone premium, apesar da carcaça de alumínio. A configuração atual é bastante média, mas não mais que isso. Deve optar por um modelo mais caro se desejar mais potência e uma melhor configuração. As taxas de desempenho medíocres na comparação do desempenho são realmente o maior ponto de crítica. Infelizmente, os alto-falantes são muito fracos sem Dolby Audio, e isso resulta na falta de volume. A câmera apresenta fraquezas evidentes em situações de baixa iluminação.
ZTE Blade V8
- 03/29/2017 v6 (old)
Niklas Böhm
Price comparison
