Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7

Herdeiro ao trono? Com o Axon 7, a ZTE está prestes a alcançar a coroa dos smartphones. Além do desempenho top e o excelente equipamento, o Android high-tec de 5,5 polegadas impressiona com o seu sistema de som Dolby Atmos, que pode encher uma sala com o som.
ZTE Axon 7 (Axon Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, AMOLED, WQHD, Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor Hall, sensor geomagnético, giroscópio
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900 MHz), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), downloads/uploads até 300/50 Mb/s, SAR 0.348 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 75
Bateria
3250 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 29 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 530 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix f/1.8, flash dual-LED, PD auto-foco, estabilizador de imagem OIS/EIS, HDR, vídeos máx. 4K/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2/2, foco fixo, vídeos máx. 1080p/30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonde de alimentação modular, cabo USB Type-C, headset, capa, ferramenta para slot SIM/micro-SD, adaptador micro-USB, guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, MiFavor 4.0, 36 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.4 mm 76.4 mm 7 mm 165 g152.6 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 155 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g151.7 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 175 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g145.9 mm 71.9 mm 9 mm 161 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +12%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s +8%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s -90%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s -17%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
257 MBit/s -24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s -90%
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
314
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 358 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 334.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.29
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"
Screen
20%
11%
43%
33%
11%
23%
Brightness middle
328
658
101%
419
28%
509
55%
350
7%
784
139%
445
36%
Brightness
334
633
90%
431
29%
511
53%
351
5%
774
132%
434
30%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
84
-5%
93
6%
98
11%
91
3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.66
0.43
0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.6
4.9
-7%
4.1
11%
2.2
52%
2.04
56%
6.5
-41%
2.8
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.7
9.1
38%
12
18%
5.8
61%
3.25
78%
11.7
20%
5.8
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
5.8
-107%
3.3
-18%
2
29%
1.63
42%
8
-186%
3.7
-32%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.26 97%
2.1 105%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
CCT
6612 98%
7840 83%
6550 99%
6768 96%
6391 102%
8699 75%
7164 91%
Contrast
997
1823
1236
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
86.86
68.08
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.35
97.46

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points -49%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +16%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points +4%
LG G5
124244 Points +1%
HTC 10
131866 Points +8%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3
2398 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points
LG G5
2396 Points
HTC 10
2376 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3
5645 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points
LG G5
5507 Points
HTC 10
5117 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points -40%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points +24%
LG G5
28730 Points +23%
HTC 10
27176 Points +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points -45%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +40%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points +37%
LG G5
32109 Points +32%
HTC 10
30061 Points +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points -22%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points -2%
LG G5
20997 Points +3%
HTC 10
20344 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points -69%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points +1%
LG G5
3277 Points +21%
HTC 10
3157 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points -84%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points -84%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points -35%
LG G5
4468 Points -3%
HTC 10
4581 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points +92%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points +63%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points +83%
LG G5
1695 Points +54%
HTC 10
1512 Points +38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps -60%
OnePlus 3
60 fps +13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps 0%
LG G5
47 fps -11%
HTC 10
43 fps -19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps -74%
OnePlus 3
89 fps +1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps -5%
LG G5
74 fps -16%
HTC 10
73 fps -17%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps -65%
OnePlus 3
46 fps +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps -64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps -4%
LG G5
30 fps +7%
HTC 10
24 fps -14%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps -75%
OnePlus 3
47 fps +21%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps +3%
LG G5
42 fps +8%
HTC 10
39 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps -62%
OnePlus 3
30 fps +88%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps -6%
LG G5
17 fps +6%
HTC 10
14 fps -12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps -80%
OnePlus 3
31 fps 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps -80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps -10%
LG G5
31 fps 0%
HTC 10
24 fps -23%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points +37%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +43%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points -3%
LG G5
5581 Points +12%
HTC 10
5809 Points +17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points -44%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points -8%
LG G5
2079 Points -4%
HTC 10
2193 Points +1%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points -12%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points +28%
LG G5
2925 Points -12%
HTC 10
2806 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points -30%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points +51%
LG G5
1478 Points -1%
HTC 10
1772 Points +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points -78%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points -63%
LG G5
4807 Points +4%
HTC 10
5009 Points +8%
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points -27%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points -1%
LG G5
900 Points -7%
HTC 10
928 Points -4%

Legend

 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 8 unknown, ARM Mali-T880 MP4,
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
8062 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points -39%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points +63%
LG G5
9731 Points +21%
HTC 10
8905 Points +10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
3097 ms *
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041 ms * -160%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * +6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8169 ms * -164%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2562 ms * +17%
LG G5
3461 ms * -12%
HTC 10
3146 ms * -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
111 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points -24%
OnePlus 3
122 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points +50%
LG G5
108 Points -3%
HTC 10
108 Points -3%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
44.75 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.12 Points -30%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points +65%
LG G5
49.7 Points +11%
HTC 10
52.1 Points +16%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Axon 7Huawei Honor 8Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLOnePlus 3Lenovo Moto Z PlaySamsung Galaxy S7LG G5HTC 10
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
7%
3%
-3%
-6%
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.4
79.2
1%
74.6
-5%
72.3
-8%
78.5
0%
83.3
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.3
50.1
-2%
50.6
-1%
53.6
4%
45.53
-11%
65.4
27%
Sequential Read 256KB
406.5
282
-31%
408.7
1%
254.8
-37%
483.8
19%
427.6
5%
275.1
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
150.9
188
25%
153.3
2%
73.1
-52%
145.7
-3%
141.3
-6%
115.6
-23%
Random Read 4KB
121.1
74
-39%
137.6
14%
38.78
-68%
85.9
-29%
89.3
-26%
29.92
-75%
Random Write 4KB
16.22
7.4
-54%
18.23
12%
45.58
181%
16.01
-1%
16.22
0%
15.89
-2%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 39.1 °C39.5 °C37.5 °C 
 38.6 °C39.4 °C36.5 °C 
 37.3 °C38.4 °C36.1 °C 
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 38 °C
35 °C36.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
35.3 °C37.2 °C37.3 °C
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.72525.432.83125.3294032.935.25033.649.76331.632.38028.429.31002725.712520.8281602239.120021.346.825020.855.631521.259.440019.463.250019.569.463017.772.580017.973.7100017.875.1125017.375.9160017.476.1200016.777.9250017.277.5315018.277.7400017.976.5500017.673.7630017.768.2800017.861.21000017.953.51250018.156.11600018.251SPL3087.1N1.366.1median 17.9median 68.2Delta1.41235.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 69.7median 51median 17.9median 69.710.211.11.510.233.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1median 48.9median 17.7median 71.18.871.78.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Axon 7Samsung Galaxy S7LG G5
ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.64 / 0.84 / 0.87 Watt
Carga midlight 6.02 / 10.45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-47%
-18%
29%
-1%
-40%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.83
-30%
0.57
11%
0.51
20%
0.68
-6%
0.55
14%
0.68
-6%
Idle Average *
0.84
2.11
-151%
1.24
-48%
0.87
-4%
1.02
-21%
1.37
-63%
1.49
-77%
Idle Maximum *
0.87
2.12
-144%
1.36
-56%
0.9
-3%
1.14
-31%
2.25
-159%
1.91
-120%
Load Average *
6.02
3.41
43%
5.92
2%
1.69
72%
4.73
21%
6.24
-4%
7.4
-23%
Load Maximum *
10.45
5.46
48%
10.53
-1%
4
62%
7.16
31%
9.12
13%
9.71
7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 55min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 05min
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
28%
95%
10%
-2%
-13%
Reader / Idle
1735
1502
-13%
1338
-23%
2540
46%
1810
4%
1833
6%
1273
-27%
H.264
704
905
29%
847
20%
1190
69%
892
27%
600
-15%
648
-8%
WiFi v1.3
411
797
94%
840
104%
824
100%
456
11%
387
-6%
413
0%
Load
245
352
44%
268
9%
652
166%
242
-1%
267
9%
203
-17%

Pro

+ Android 6.0
+ Painel AMOLED QHD
+ USB Tipo C
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Muito bom módulo de câmera
+ Desempenho muito alto
+ Sem afogamentos
+ Excelente som Dolby Surround
+ Recurso de carga rápida

Contra

- Incomum MiFavor 4.0 UI
- Somente velocidade de USB 2.0
- PWM flickering
- Bateria não removível
- Duração da bateria apenas medíocre
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

A ZTE não prometeu muito: O Axon 7 se enfrenta com facilidades a smartphones de gama superior, como o Samsung Galaxy S7 mesmo que em última instância, não consiga chegar ao nível desses aparelhos. O smartphone ZTE não possui o recurso final para isto - uma veloz porta USB, armazenamento interno maior, e carregamento sem fio, teriam resultado em um pontuação um pouco mais alta. No entanto, isto não diminui a excelente configuração e o pacote de desempenho que o usuário recebe com o Axon 7.

O ZTE Axon 7 não é apenas um digno oponente para smartphones de gama alta como o Samsung Galaxy S7, ele também convence com um excelente som Dolby surround.

Gostamos particularmente da carcaça de alta qualidade, painel QHD nítido, muito bom módulo de câmera e o desempenho mais que suficiente para cada smartphone na situação de teste. E qualquer um à procura de um smartphone com um som realmente bom, terá que optar pelo ZTE Axon 7 porque acusticamente ele supera seus rivais, e por muito, com o seu som Dolby-Atmos.

O ZTE Axon 7 também deve aceitar algumas críticas, embora não haja muito o que criticar. Alguns usuários podem não gostar do visual da interface MiFavor 4.0 - mas o visual pode ser modificado para que seja quase igual ao do Android padrão, mediante uma app. Uma porta USB mais veloz teria combinado bem com o Axon 7, bem como uma duração de bateria um pouco melhor e uma bateria removível.

ZTE Axon 7 - 10/31/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
79%
Médio
79%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7
Manuel Masiero, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-26)