Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S – Tela grande, preço baixo

Ampliação de Pixels.

O que você ganha se combinar uma câmera de alta resolução com capacidade de zoom com uma bateria gigante? Um Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S por apenas $210. Descubra que compromissos, se houver, você terá que fazer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Redmi Note 12 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, dedicado, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 165.8 x 76.7
Bateria
5020 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48.0MP, f/​1.79, phase-detection AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps, 720p/​960fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro (camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth-of-field (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.48, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 0,72W/​kg, body SAR0,98W/​kg; LTE speed: 800 Mbps (download), 150 Mbps (upload), fanless
peso
209 g, Suprimento de energia: 76 g
Preço
229 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test Group

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
80.7 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
76.6 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
81.3 %
v7 (old)
04/2020
Huawei P40 Lite
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2310x1080
75.5 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Gigaset GS290
Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
11/2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080

Size Comparison

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g159.2 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 183 g157 mm 75.1 mm 9.65 mm 190 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (286min - 403max) MBit/s +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (302min - 325max) MBit/s +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s
Gigaset GS290
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 (81min - 121max) MBit/s -58%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (40min - 67max) MBit/s -78%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (330min - 362max) MBit/s +23%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (61min - 334max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s
Gigaset GS290
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 (98min - 120max) MBit/s -61%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (38min - 57max) MBit/s -81%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (225-321)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø256 (247-263)
Garmin Edge 520: overview
Garmin Edge 520: overview
Garmin Edge 520: turning point
Garmin Edge 520: turning point
Garmin Edge 520: bridge
Garmin Edge 520: bridge
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: turning point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: turning point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: bridge
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Main camera sample photo
Main camera sample photo
Wide-angle camera sample photo
Wide-angle camera sample photo
Macro camera sample photo
Macro camera sample photo
ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: 7.3 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 15.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
55.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: 46.88 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 93.71 ∆E
615
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 611.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 622 cd/m²
Contraste: 1111:1 (Preto: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
114.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.206
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.4"
Huawei P40 Lite
IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4"
Gigaset GS290
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen
15%
0%
11%
-1%
Brightness middle
622
504
-19%
478
-23%
465
-25%
669
8%
Brightness
612
452
-26%
448
-27%
460
-25%
630
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
83
-12%
87
-7%
88
-6%
87
-7%
Black Level *
0.56
0.28
50%
0.49
12%
0.2
64%
0.42
25%
Contrast
1111
1800
62%
976
-12%
2325
109%
1593
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.98
3.84
4%
3
25%
5.3
-33%
4.8
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.33
6.1
17%
5.6
24%
7.3
-0%
9
-23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
2.7
40%
4.1
9%
4.2
7%
6.2
-38%
Gamma
2.206 100%
2.235 98%
2.26 97%
2.09 105%
2.24 98%
CCT
7361 88%
7125 91%
7282 89%
6558 99%
7846 83%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points -45%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
604 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
150 Points -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (545 - 570, n=7)
562 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +77%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1280 Points -24%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1949 Points +15%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
875 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1622 - 1798, n=7)
1713 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +95%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1173 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
363 Points -69%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2493 Points +113%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
688 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1163 - 1201, n=3)
1179 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=47, last 2 years)
7244 Points +518%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1005 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points -56%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
709 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (982 - 1063, n=3)
1017 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=53, last 2 years)
7760 Points +672%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2620 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2484 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  ()
2620 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5422 Points +107%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6263 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7624 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  ()
6263 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
14892 Points +138%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
5702 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)
11924 Points
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9051 Points 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
12070 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (9027 - 13821, n=7)
10741 Points +19%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6969 Points -9%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
9164 Points +19%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5068 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (7673 - 10181, n=7)
8748 Points +14%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points -36%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
41003 Points +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11286 Points -71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (33926 - 40241, n=5)
38044 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
47563 Points -10%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11180 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (49743 - 53689, n=5)
52304 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points +22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
27654 Points +38%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11675 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14849 - 24117, n=5)
19808 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points -50%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3437 Points -2%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
725 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3086 - 3683, n=7)
3509 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3384 Points -7%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
630 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3195 - 3853, n=7)
3642 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points -22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3638 Points +19%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1545 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2757 - 3263, n=7)
3116 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3591 Points -2%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3172 - 3783, n=7)
3625 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +204%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3488 Points -8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
642 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3323 - 4008, n=7)
3796 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +421%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points -28%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4003 Points +23%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1619 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2737 - 3267, n=7)
3135 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2904 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
523 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2499 - 2590, n=7)
2542 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2740 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
440 Points -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2356 - 2462, n=7)
2408 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points -24%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3676 Points +17%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1541 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3083 - 3241, n=7)
3158 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2954 Points +10%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
515 Points -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2253 - 2743, n=7)
2631 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points -61%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2752 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
431 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2146 - 2642, n=7)
2515 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +347%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points -27%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3972 Points +22%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1619 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2730 - 3321, n=7)
3137 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2636 Points +12%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
564 Points -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1989 - 2454, n=7)
2320 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)
2841 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2552 Points +13%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
466 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1874 - 2382, n=7)
2237 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)
3085 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2977 Points +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2129 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2536 - 2765, n=7)
2675 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)
2706 Points -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
42 fps -29%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
59 fps 0%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
20 fps -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (59 - 70, n=5)
63.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps +45%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
89 fps +3%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
22 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (71 - 86, n=5)
80.8 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +224%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps -8%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
52 fps +41%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
10 fps -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (34 - 39, n=5)
37 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +103%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
53 fps +26%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (35 - 42, n=5)
39.6 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +291%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
34 fps +26%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.1 fps -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (24 - 29, n=5)
26.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +141%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
33 fps +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.7 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (25 - 31, n=5)
29.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +276%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
20 fps +25%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14 - 17, n=5)
15.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +197%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
19 fps +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14 - 18, n=5)
17 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +291%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps -12%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps +24%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.6 fps -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (17 - 17, n=7)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +190%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (15 - 19, n=6)
18 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps -17%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
13 fps +18%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (11 - 11, n=7)
11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +237%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7.9 fps +13%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6.8 - 7.1, n=7)
6.96 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +351%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
167305 Points -39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
319383 Points +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
108862 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282085 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (253274 - 288306, n=5)
272982 Points -1%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19.4 (3.7min - 33.6max) fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
21.2 (4.9min - 40.7max) fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18.1 (2.3min - 44.7max) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
0 fps
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2416 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3243 Score +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  ()
2416 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score +141%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points -35%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3695 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3287 - 3542, n=5)
3412 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +77%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points -36%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7178 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (5783 - 6908, n=5)
6506 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +48%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points -35%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4726 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3845 - 4573, n=5)
4204 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +56%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points -49%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4339 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3757 - 3830, n=5)
3786 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +340%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1267 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1226 - 1410, n=5)
1315 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +10%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.3 Points +146%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
55.4 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.53 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (37.8 - 54.4, n=4)
47.2 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.3 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.12 Points -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
91.2 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59.7 - 94.7, n=5)
84.1 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
72.1 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.38 Points -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
133.6 runs/min +203%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
53.2 runs/min +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (26.8 - 45.2, n=4)
38.5 runs/min -13%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min -42%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +113%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
97 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (53 - 78, n=5)
67.6 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
55 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +112%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
17925 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11846 - 17734, n=5)
16261 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * -140%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3002 ms * -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2532 - 3577, n=5)
2957 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794 ms *
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
2472 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8Huawei P40 LiteGigaset GS290Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
28%
-26%
10%
-5%
272%
Sequential Read 256KB
496.6
301
-39%
913
84%
274.2
-45%
535
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
214.8
239
11%
181.7
-15%
196.8
-8%
193.5
-10%
Random Read 4KB
137
57.3
-58%
157.3
15%
54.7
-60%
156.2
14%
130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
123.6
128.1
4%
175.4
42%
19.77
-84%
180.4
46%
101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
82.6 ?(Nano Memory Card)
11%
81.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20)
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
48.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
70.6 ?(Nano Memory Card)
29%
73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
35%
57.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.8 (19-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.2 (29-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (2-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (23-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (21-31)
Carga Máxima
 39.9 °C36.1 °C34.8 °C 
 39.4 °C36.3 °C34.4 °C 
 37.6 °C35.7 °C34.3 °C 
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
31.2 °C36.1 °C39.9 °C
33 °C36 °C37.4 °C
33 °C35.4 °C36.7 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.430.5253531.93127.126.44026275030.431.26325.228.88022.722.510025.522.112520.124.716019.235.420017.839.425017.845.931516.149.940016.655.750015.962.563014.365.580014.770.4100014.873.6125014.371160014.165.1200016.369.1250014.472.3315013.868.7400013.970.4500014.264.4630014.559.1800014.666.4100001568.11250015.359.11600015.751.6SPL60.964.571.226.981N13.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.4median 48.4median 13.9median 64.7Delta3.311.122.81316.332.428.93530.627.128.42629.830.430.825.226.922.72325.522.920.122.319.230.417.842.817.849.516.152.416.654.315.959.414.36114.767.314.871.814.367.814.166.116.368.914.471.413.870.113.970.514.265.214.561.614.665.21566.615.358.615.741.164.571.226.980.117.725.60.945.7median 15.3median 61.6median 13.9median 62.93.211.81317.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Gigaset GS290
4700 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
24%
19%
10%
20%
11%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.3
13%
0.79
47%
0.88
41%
0.79
47%
0.982 ?(0.75 - 1.5, n=5)
35%
Idle Average *
2.1
2
5%
2.14
-2%
2.05
2%
2.32
-10%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
2.8
-12%
2.23
11%
2.1
16%
2.38
5%
2.06 ?(1.84 - 2.5, n=5)
18%
Load Average *
5.2
3.9
25%
3.6
31%
4.73
9%
4.72
9%
Load Maximum *
7.5
7.2
4%
5.17
31%
5.61
25%
7.68
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
37h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 39min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Gigaset GS290
4700 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
-11%
-21%
-22%
Reader / Idle
2263
1953
-14%
2154
-5%
1893
-16%
H.264
1269
1048
-17%
1176
-7%
984
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1187
988
-17%
1007
-15%
934
-21%
864
-27%
Load
279
276
-1%
228
-18%
212
-24%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Conjunto versátil de câmeras
+ Porta de infravermelhos
+ Software atualizado no momento da redação
+ Desempenho decente...
+ ...sem afogamento térmico
+ Leitor de cartões microSD dedicado
+ Carga rápida

Contra

- Sem NFC
- Tela de baixo contraste
- Aplicativos bloatware pré carregados

Veredicto – Muito a Oferecer

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen
In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen

O Redmi Note 9S da Xiaomi é a prova viva de que 200 dólares irão lhe dar um ótimo smartphone em 2020, tanto em termos de tamanho quanto em termos de equipamento e conectividade. É claro que você não deve esperar níveis de desempenho LTE semelhantes aos dos smartphones de gama alta, Wi-Fi 6 ou NFC.

O que a Redmi Note 9S tem a oferecer em troca é um conjunto flexível e versátil de câmeras com múltiplas lentes bem utilizáveis. Mais uma vez, não espere o mesmo nível de qualidade fotográfica que em smartphones de gama alta muito mais caros, mas abaixar um pouco suas expectativas será mais do que suficiente para aceitar o sistema de câmera pelo que é.

Você também receberá uma bateria gigantesca, que é pelo menos parcialmente responsável pelo alto peso do Redmi, com quase 20 horas de duração em nosso teste Wi-Fi.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S oferece uma câmera decente e longa duração da bateria a um preço baixo.

A tela brilhante poderia ter se beneficiado de uma relação de contraste mais alta. Os serviços de localização foram precisos o suficiente para o uso diário. Considerando sua classe de preço, a Note 9S foi bastante poderoso em geral. Ele não sofre de afogamento térmico sob carga e oferece um sistema Android atualizado no momento da redação.

No geral, o Redmi Note 9S merece o nosso total apoio, pois vem com ótimos recursos a um preço baixo.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S - 05/19/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
44 / 70 → 63%
Peso
88%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
29 / 64 → 46%
Desempenho da aplicação
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
59%
Médio
75%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S – Tela grande, preço baixo
Florian Schmitt, 2020-05-26 (Update: 2020-06- 3)