Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Abundância de recursos por um preço baixo

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Criminoso reincidente.

A Xiaomi tenta agitar a concorrência com smartphones baratos e bem equipados de gama média. Com o Redmi Note 9 Pro, a Xiaomi jogou outra chave inglesa nas engrenagens dos pontos de preços estabelecidos. Por um preço de rua recomendado de 250 euros (~$282), o smartphone de 6,67 polegadas vem com uma câmera quadrupla de 64-MP e uma enorme bateria. Nossa análise mostrará se uma compra vale a pena.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/25/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 45.1 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, e exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Motor de vibração de eixo Z linear, sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola eletrônica, Emissor de IV, Wi-Fi direct, USB OTG, DRM Widevine Level 1, Camera2 API Level 3

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (Banda 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), head SAR 0.662 W/kg, body SAR 1.021 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 165.75 x 76.68

Bateria

5020 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix Quad-camera: 64-MP main optics (autofocus, f/1.89, 1/1.72", 0.8µm) + 8-MP ultra-wide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 5-MP macro (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm) + 2-MP depth information (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm), video at up to 4K@30FPS, slow-motion @720p960FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1.0µm, slow-motion selfie @120fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, Carregador modular de 33 watts, cabo USB (Type-A para Type-C), SIM tool, capa protetora, guia de início rápido, informação da garantia, MIUI 11, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

209 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g

Preço

250 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	200 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
81.3 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Lite Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6	183 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2310x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s
Huawei P40 Lite Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	338 (286^min - 403^max) MBit/s -39%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	332 (312^min - 337^max) MBit/s -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319 (302^min - 325^max) MBit/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (189^min - 335^max) MBit/s -46%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (137^min - 336^max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	353 (330^min - 362^max) MBit/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	298 (185^min - 350^max) MBit/s -52%
Huawei P40 Lite Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (61^min - 334^max) MBit/s -52%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	294 (80^min - 338^max) MBit/s -53%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 (145^min - 352^max) MBit/s -53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø609 (283-670)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø551 (465-583)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1 Tageslicht-Szene 2 5-facher Zoom Ultraweitwinkel Lowlight-Umgebung

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Huawei P40 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Huawei P40 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Huawei P40 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Huawei P40 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Huawei P40 Pro

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 5.91 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 11.17 ∆E


575 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	578 cd/m²
563 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	567 cd/m²
559 cd/m²	578 cd/m²	567 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 610 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 578.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 610 cd/m²
Contraste: 1649:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Huawei P40 Lite IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-34%	-65%	-86%	-112%	-43%
Brightness middle	610	589 -3%	669 10%	442 -28%	594 -3%	478 -22%
Brightness	579	589 2%	630 9%	419 -28%	613 6%	448 -23%
Brightness Distribution	92	94 2%	87 -5%	90 -2%	89 -3%	87 -5%
Black Level *	0.37		0.42 -14%	0.37 -0%		0.49 -32%
Contrast	1649		1593 -3%	1195 -28%		976 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	2.22 -23%	4.8 -167%	6.1 -239%	6.1 -239%	3 -67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	8.24 -175%	9 -200%	9.7 -223%	10.6 -253%	5.6 -87%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	2.6 -4%	6.2 -148%	5.9 -136%	7 -180%	4.1 -64%
Gamma	2.31 ^95%	2.111 ^104%	2.24 ^98%	2.35 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6864 ^95%	6508 ^100%	7846 ^83%	7631 ^85%	7370 ^88%	7282 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2404 Hz

≤ 43 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	320 Points -44%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	282 Points -50%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	604 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (545 - 570, n=7)	562 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +75%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1475 Points -17%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1430 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1949 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1622 - 1798, n=7)	1713 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +87%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1163 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1201 Points +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1338 Points +15%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2493 Points +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1163 - 1201, n=3)	1179 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +543%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	982 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1063 Points +8%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1337 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (982 - 1063, n=3)	1017 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +710%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6416 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14946 Points +64%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points +52%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	12070 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (9027 - 13821, n=7)	10741 Points +18%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5649 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	9967 Points +27%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points +29%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8185 Points +5%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	9164 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (7673 - 10181, n=7)	8748 Points +12%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23866 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	33832 Points -12%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points -11%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23447 Points -39%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	41003 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (33926 - 40241, n=5)	38044 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25086 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	39137 Points -24%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23159 Points -55%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	47563 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (49743 - 53689, n=5)	52304 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20393 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	22928 Points +14%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points -26%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	24514 Points +22%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	27654 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14849 - 24117, n=5)	19808 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2068 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points -32%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1899 Points -46%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3437 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3086 - 3683, n=7)	3509 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2027 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2219 Points -39%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points +2%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1767 Points -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3384 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3195 - 3853, n=7)	3642 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2225 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3267 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points -6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2568 Points -21%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3638 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2757 - 3263, n=7)	3116 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2060 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points -34%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1885 Points -48%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3591 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3172 - 3783, n=7)	3625 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +205%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1993 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2323 Points -39%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1747 Points -54%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3488 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3323 - 4008, n=7)	3796 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +421%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2336 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3362 Points +4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points -3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2606 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4003 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2737 - 3267, n=7)	3135 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1592 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points -4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1276 Points -49%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2904 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2499 - 2590, n=7)	2542 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1473 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2218 Points -6%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1117 Points -53%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2740 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2356 - 2462, n=7)	2408 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2217 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3280 Points +3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points -3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2550 Points -20%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3676 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3083 - 3241, n=7)	3158 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1654 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points -10%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1265 Points -53%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2954 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2253 - 2743, n=7)	2631 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1530 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2322 Points -9%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1102 Points -57%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2752 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2146 - 2642, n=7)	2515 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +354%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2311 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3326 Points +3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points -5%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2621 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3972 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2730 - 3321, n=7)	3137 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1554 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2087 Points -11%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1248 Points -47%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2636 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1989 - 2454, n=7)	2320 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1438 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1978 Points -12%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1103 Points -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2552 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1874 - 2382, n=7)	2237 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2161 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2543 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points -6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2304 Points -15%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2977 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2536 - 2765, n=7)	2675 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	58 fps -3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59 - 70, n=5)	63.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	46 fps -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	82 fps -4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	89 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (71 - 86, n=5)	80.8 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +229%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	42 fps +8%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps -3%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	52 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (34 - 39, n=5)	37 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +94%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	24 fps -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps +20%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	53 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (35 - 42, n=5)	39.6 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +303%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	26 fps -10%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps -7%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	34 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (24 - 29, n=5)	26.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +127%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	29 fps -3%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	33 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (25 - 31, n=5)	29.4 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +291%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.6 fps -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14 fps -18%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps -6%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	20 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14 - 17, n=5)	15.6 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +181%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	16 fps -11%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	19 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14 - 18, n=5)	17 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +292%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.1 fps -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	17 fps 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	7.5 fps -56%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17 - 17, n=7)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +191%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps +6%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps +6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8.8 fps -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (15 - 19, n=6)	18 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +343%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.5 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6.8 fps -38%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	4.5 fps -59%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	13 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11 - 11, n=7)	11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +240%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	11 fps +59%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2.9 fps -58%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7.9 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (6.8 - 7.1, n=7)	6.96 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +364%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	181295 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282085 Points +4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	319383 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (253274 - 288306, n=5)	272982 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	634 Points -82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3054 Points -11%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3695 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3287 - 3542, n=5)	3412 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +83%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4738 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6155 Points -10%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7178 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (5783 - 6908, n=5)	6506 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +48%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1605 Points -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3609 Points -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points +3%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4726 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3845 - 4573, n=5)	4204 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +52%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2168 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3419 Points -9%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4339 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3757 - 3830, n=5)	3786 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +350%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 Points -99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1145 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1267 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1226 - 1410, n=5)	1315 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +28%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +151%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	55.4 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.9 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (37.8 - 54.4, n=4)	47.2 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	35.3 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	27.68 Points -42%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	91.2 Points +5%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.6 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59.7 - 94.7, n=5)	84.1 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	72.1 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	51.3 Points -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +201%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	53.2 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	41.6 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (26.8 - 45.2, n=4)	38.5 runs/min -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	29.1 runs/min -36%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +109%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	97 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (53 - 78, n=5)	67.6 Points -5%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	57 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	55 Points -23%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +115%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	17925 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11846 - 17734, n=5)	16261 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	15606 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	10194 Points -41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	4375 ms * -54%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	3002 ms * -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2532 - 3577, n=5)	2957 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850 ms *
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	2472 ms * +13%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy A51	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	Realme 6 Pro	Oppo A91	Huawei P40 Lite	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-1%	17%	19%	-6%	35%	-5%	326%
Sequential Read 256KB	498.1	496.1 0%	535 7%	513 3%	505 1%	913 83%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) 3%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 269%
Sequential Write 256KB	171.1	184.9 8%	193.5 13%	203.3 19%	185.3 8%	181.7 6%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) 2%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 733%
Random Read 4KB	122.6	110.8 -10%	156.2 27%	158.7 29%	145.6 19%	157.3 28%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) -4%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 126%
Random Write 4KB	112.9	104.4 -8%	180.4 60%	154 36%	28.55 -75%	175.4 55%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -28%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 174%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	86.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 1%	82.6 ?(Nano Memory Card) 8%	73.4 ?(36.8 - 85.4, n=10) -4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	57.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%	60.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 10%	70.6 ?(Nano Memory Card) 29%	55.4 ?(33.3 - 65.3, n=10) 1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2a: Ø29.8 (21-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (19-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.1 °C	38.4 °C	38.2 °C
38.2 °C	37.5 °C	37.7 °C
36.4 °C	36.6 °C	38.2 °C

Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C


34.5 °C	34.7 °C	38.5 °C
33.9 °C	35 °C	37.5 °C
34.4 °C	35.2 °C	36.3 °C

Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 29.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ocioso	0.75 / 2.19 / 2.24 Watt
Carga	3.88 / 5.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	-14%	-11%	15%	3%	-4%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	0.75	0.9 -20%	0.79 -5%	0.92 -23%	0.82 -9%	0.79 -5%	0.982 ?(0.75 - 1.5, n=5) -31%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Average *	2.19	1.7 22%	2.32 -6%	1.79 18%	1.73 21%	2.14 2%	1.94 ?(1.79 - 2.19, n=5) 11%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.24	1.8 20%	2.38 -6%	1.88 16%	1.75 22%	2.23 -0%	2.06 ?(1.84 - 2.5, n=5) 8%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	3.88	5.2 -34%	4.72 -22%	5.41 -39%	2.33 40%	3.6 7%	4.02 ?(2.65 - 5.41, n=5) -4%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -66%
Load Maximum *	5.97	6.6 -11%	7.68 -29%	7.59 -27%	5.97 -0%	5.17 13%	6.16 ?(4.86 - 7.59, n=5) -3%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -64%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		38h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 03min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-24%	-21%	-12%	-49%	-10%
Reader / Idle	2336	1689 -28%	1893 -19%			2154 -8%
H.264	1096	846 -23%	984 -10%			1176 7%
WiFi v1.3	1175	698 -41%	864 -26%	1031 -12%	605 -49%	1007 -14%
Load	303	289 -5%	212 -30%			228 -25%

Pro

+ Bom valor

+ NFC

+ microSD e 2 dual SIM

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Baixos valores SAR

+ Carregador de 33 watts

+ Rápido desempenho do sistema

+ Sem afogamentos

+ Duração da bateria muito longa

Contra

- Bloatware pré-instalado

- Fotos com faixa dinâmica estreita

- Jogos limitados a 30 FPS

Veredicto - Mais uma vez com muitos recursos por um preço baixo

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Com o Redmi Note 9 Pro, Xiaomi acrescentou outro smartphone que brilha com uma ótima relação preço-desempenho à sua carteira.

Por 250 Euros (~$282), oferece muito: Uma tela IPS brilhante de 6,67 polegadas, 6 GB de RAM, 64 ou 128 GB de armazenamento interno, o rápido SoC Snapdragon 720G octa-core e um sistema de câmera quadruplo com uma resolução de 64 MP. Graças à bateria de 5020-mAh, o Redmi Note 9 Pro atinge excelentes durações, o adaptador de energia de 33 watts carrega o smartphone rapidamente e há práticos extras, como uma bandeja de cartão grande que aceita simultaneamente um microSD e dois cartões SIM.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro oferece muito valor por seu preço, enquanto sua longa duração da bateria e características extras como o NFC o fazem sobressair da multidão.

Suas desvantagens, por outro lado, são poucas. Dito isto, a câmera de 64-MP não é tão impressionante quanto suas especificações poderiam sugerir, uma vez que, em última análise, ela é carente em termos de alcance dinâmico. Em contraste, o fato de os jogos serem limitados a 30 FPS não é um grande problema, particularmente porque raramente ficam abaixo desta marca de FPS. Embora o smartphone contenha bloatware de propaganda pré-instalado, os respectivos aplicativos podem ser excluídos.

O lançamento deste smartphone pode encher os compradores do Redmi Note 9S com pesar. Embora o Redmi Note 9 Pro seja fisicamente quase idêntico, ele oferece várias características superiores, incluindo um módulo NFC por um preço bastante baixo. No entanto, atualizar de um Redmi Note 8 Pro não vale muito a pena, já que houve apenas pequenas melhorias de geração para geração.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro - 06/23/2020 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 72%

Peso

88%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

29 / 64 → 46%

Desempenho da aplicação

70 / 86 → 81%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

65%

Médio

77%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Abundância de recursos por um preço baixo

Manuel Masiero, 2020-06-25 (Update: 2020-06-28)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Mais uma vez com muitos recursos por um preço baixo

More articles related to this device

Price comparison