Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: SoC Pseudo Gaming se encontra com Cam 64-MP

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Telefone de gama média para gamers?!

No papel, o Redmi Note 8 Pro tem tudo o que precisa para ser o novo rei dos smartphones de gama média. Mas o novo MediaTek Helio G90T pode cumprir suas promessas? A resposta pode ser encontrada na seguinte análise do telefone Redmi.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felivitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processador

Mediatek Helio G90T 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G76 MP4

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.53 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 109.6 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Bússola digital, acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB type-C, OTG, Miracast, LED de status

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.79 x 161.35 x 76.4

Bateria

4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix Quad: 64MP (f/1.9, 26mm, 1/1.7", 0.8µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 13mm, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm) + 2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm), camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: onscreen, Cabo USB, carregador modular, capa de silicone, MiUI, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.997W/kg head, 1.466W/kg body, DRM Widevine: L1 (EU) L3 (China), fanless

peso

200 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g

Preço

250 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	200 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
88 % v6 ^(old)	05/2019	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE SD 712, Adreno 616	155 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.97"	2340x1080
83.9 % v6 ^(old)	04/2019	Sony Xperia 10 SD 630, Adreno 508	162 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.00"	2520x1080
78.3 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Huawei P30 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	159 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.15"	2312x1080
79.2 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 SD 665, Adreno 610	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
79.1 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Samsung Galaxy A40 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2	140 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.90"	2340x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy A50 Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Smartphone Review

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Sony Xperia 10 Huawei P30 Lite Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Samsung Galaxy A40 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319 (302^min - 325^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	303 (242^min - 355^max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	268 (244^min - 288^max) MBit/s -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s -21%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	353 (330^min - 362^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	339 (320^min - 349^max) MBit/s -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	222 (203^min - 243^max) MBit/s -37%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -47%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (330-362)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (302-325)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 10.08 ∆E min: 1.99 - max: 19.52 ∆E


642 cd/m²	653 cd/m²	615 cd/m²
644 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	616 cd/m²
593 cd/m²	658 cd/m²	583 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 669 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 630.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 669 cd/m²
Contraste: 1593:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy A40 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9"
Screen		28%	-2%	5%	21%	-23%
Brightness middle	669	583 -13%	547 -18%	451 -33%	656 -2%	358 -46%
Brightness	630	577 -8%	525 -17%	430 -32%	643 2%	370 -41%
Brightness Distribution	87	97 11%	93 7%	90 3%	95 9%	94 8%
Black Level *	0.42		0.36 14%	0.55 -31%	0.54 -29%
Contrast	1593		1519 -5%	820 -49%	1215 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.8	1.6 67%	4.6 4%	1.4 71%	1.1 77%	7.4 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9	3.9 57%	12.1 -34%	4.4 51%	2.4 73%	12.5 -39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.2	2.7 56%	3.9 37%	2.5 60%	2.2 65%	4 35%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.17 ^101%	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.084 ^106%
CCT	7846 ^83%	6267 ^104%	7158 ^91%	6422 ^101%	6263 ^104%	7078 ^92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	391 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	314 Points -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	391 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +137%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1612 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1327 Points -18%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	1612 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +87%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1793 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	363 Points -80%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	1793 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +133%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1218 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points -65%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	1218 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +179%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2484 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1495 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1329 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2363 - 2594, n=4)	2452 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +121%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	7624 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5366 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4105 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (6043 - 7795, n=4)	6878 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +98%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	5702 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points -34%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5122 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3722 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (5702 - 5862, n=2)	5782 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +110%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14946 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7446 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6923 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points -39%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (14669 - 14946, n=2)	14808 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	9967 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points -40%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6498 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5293 Points -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (9967 - 10512, n=2)	10240 Points +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	33832 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points -52%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	23534 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13457 Points -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (30326 - 33832, n=2)	32079 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	39137 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points -54%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	24654 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13821 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (36463 - 39137, n=2)	37800 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	22928 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points -46%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	20354 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12321 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points -15%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (19084 - 22928, n=2)	21006 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points -45%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1728 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	807 Points -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2390 - 3374, n=4)	3046 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2219 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points -44%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1607 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	702 Points -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2219 - 3472, n=4)	3036 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3267 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2378 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1687 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3194 - 3283, n=4)	3246 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points -43%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1778 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	930 Points -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2412 - 3128, n=4)	2916 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +361%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2323 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points -44%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1668 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	823 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2323 - 3057, n=4)	2850 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +748%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3362 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points -48%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2348 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1710 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3143 - 3438, n=4)	3322 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1114 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	635 Points -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2390 - 2515, n=4)	2473 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2218 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points -68%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	967 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	539 Points -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2218 - 2384, n=4)	2338 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3280 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points -50%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2408 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1675 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3114 - 3280, n=4)	3192 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points -63%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	646 Points -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2412 - 2694, n=4)	2571 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2322 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points -66%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	980 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	549 Points -76%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2322 - 2476, n=4)	2426 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +397%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3326 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points -50%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2298 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1691 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3188 - 3492, n=4)	3345 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points -59%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1036 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	717 Points -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2087 - 2684, n=4)	2483 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1978 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	898 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	604 Points -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (1978 - 2603, n=4)	2411 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2543 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2250 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2061 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2333 - 2774, n=4)	2597 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps -57%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	23 fps -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (58 - 59, n=4)	58.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	82 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps -65%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	36 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	25 fps -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (78 - 82, n=4)	79.3 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +241%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	42 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	17 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12 fps -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (42 - 45, n=4)	43 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +80%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps -73%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	19 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13 fps -73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps -22%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (46 - 50, n=4)	48.3 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +237%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	26 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps -70%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	12 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	7.4 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (26 - 27, n=4)	26.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +153%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	13 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (29 - 31, n=4)	29.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +304%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps -69%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.1 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.6 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (14 - 16, n=4)	15.5 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +241%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps -67%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.9 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5.2 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (16 - 18, n=4)	17.5 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +341%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	17 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.2 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.2 fps -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (17 - 18, n=4)	17.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +191%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps -74%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.1 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.7 fps -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (19 - 20, n=4)	19.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +320%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6.8 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps +34%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps -60%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	4.4 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.9 fps -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (6.8 - 11, n=4)	9.45 fps +39%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +450%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps -85%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1.8 fps -84%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (6.5 - 11, n=4)	7.78 fps -29%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +191%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19.4 (3.7^min - 33.6^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (8.4^min - 36.6^max) fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.44 (3.6^min - 21.99^max) fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5.35 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps -20%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	19.4 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	21.2 (4.9^min - 40.7^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (7.68^min - 27.7^max) fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.65 (3.4^min - 18.65^max) fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.43 fps -70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps -36%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T ()	21.2 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	18.1 (2.3^min - 44.7^max) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	0 fps -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (8.05^min - 26.52^max) fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.24 (5.77^min - 20.65^max) fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.21 fps -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (18.1 - 18.1, n=2)	9.05 fps -50%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	103205 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	210836 Points

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3243 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Score -65%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	927 Score -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3243 - 3255, n=2)	3249 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +79%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3054 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points -55%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2254 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1679 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2690 - 3135, n=4)	2957 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +106%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6155 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points -49%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5006 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3788 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (4193 - 6155, n=4)	5063 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +65%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3609 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points -73%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2808 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1935 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3609 - 3765, n=4)	3671 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +88%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3419 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points -59%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1881 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1114 Points -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3419 - 3694, n=4)	3561 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +395%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1145 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points -29%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	937 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	974 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (1145 - 1353, n=4)	1278 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +37%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282085 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (282085 - 301404, n=2)	291745 Points +3%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	97626 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points -27%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (95868 - 97626, n=2)	96747 Points -1%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	79602 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points -59%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (79602 - 92690, n=2)	86146 Points +8%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	59227 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points -35%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (56316 - 59227, n=2)	57772 Points -2%
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	45630 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (45630 - 56530, n=2)	51080 Points +12%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +241%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (35.3 - 41.7, n=4)	37.1 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	35.3 Points
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.65 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	22.65 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points -54%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	72.1 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (69.8 - 72.1, n=4)	70.8 Points -2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	55.1 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	50.3 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	42.7 Points -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +227%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	41.6 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (31.4 - 41.6, n=4)	35.2 runs/min -15%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.8 runs/min -26%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	24.1 runs/min -42%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +170%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points +31%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	55 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (46 - 55, n=4)	52.3 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	52 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	52 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +138%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (15061 - 16947, n=4)	15812 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	15606 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	9405 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	7798 Points -50%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points -69%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms * -242%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)	4976 ms * -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	4562 ms * -52%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * -38%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (2793 - 3782, n=4)	3223 ms * -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	3002 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +48%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	208 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 74)	155 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	145 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	144 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (116 - 144, n=2)	130 Points -10%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Sony Xperia 10	Huawei P30 Lite	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	Samsung Galaxy A40	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-31%	-27%	-24%	-27%	-35%	-11%	257%
Sequential Read 256KB	535	492.5 -8%	273.8 -49%	293.2 -45%	297.6 -44%	295 -45%	530 ?(286 - 948, n=37) -1%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 244%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.5	190.1 -2%	232.9 20%	158.6 -18%	160.5 -17%	99.6 -49%	212 ?(103.4 - 466, n=37) 10%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 636%
Random Read 4KB	156.2	115.8 -26%	53.1 -66%	71.6 -54%	84.8 -46%	75.7 -52%	130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37) -16%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 77%
Random Write 4KB	180.4	21.86 -88%	14.39 -92%	87.3 -52%	91.2 -49%	13.2 -93%	101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37) -44%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 71%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 16%	76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	81.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20) -5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18%	52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	65.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	53.2 ?(28.6 - 70.2, n=20) -7%

PUBG Mobile

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: Ø39.7 (34-42)

Asphalt 9 Legends

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro; High Quality: Ø29.7 (20-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Dead Trigger 2

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: Ø60 (59-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36.1 °C	36.1 °C	36.9 °C
34.8 °C	35.5 °C	37.1 °C
34.1 °C	35.5 °C	36.9 °C

Máximo: 37.1 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C


31.8 °C	34.7 °C	36.6 °C
32 °C	33.9 °C	36.6 °C
32.9 °C	34.5 °C	34.9 °C

Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 26.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ocioso	0.79 / 2.32 / 2.38 Watt
Carga	4.72 / 7.68 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G90T	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		41%	17%	-3%	24%	-5%	2%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.79	0.53 33%	0.72 9%	0.91 -15%	0.62 22%	0.8 -1%	0.993 ?(0.58 - 1.4, n=4) -26%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Average *	2.32	1.18 49%	2.16 7%	2.41 -4%	1.77 24%	1.4 40%	1.79 ?(1.5 - 2.32, n=4) 23%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Maximum *	2.38	1.2 50%	2.17 9%	2.43 -2%	1.8 24%	2.3 3%	1.985 ?(1.76 - 2.38, n=4) 17%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 32%
Load Average *	4.72	3.04 36%	3.32 30%	4.57 3%	3.42 28%	7.4 -57%	4.78 ?(4.19 - 5.3, n=4) -1%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -37%
Load Maximum *	7.68	4.83 37%	5.34 30%	7.57 1%	6.14 20%	8.6 -12%	7.94 ?(6.59 - 8.8, n=4) -3%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		31h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 32min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-20%	-28%	-28%	-1%	-6%
Reader / Idle	1893	1374 -27%	1006 -47%	1248 -34%	2139 13%	1689 -11%
H.264	984	853 -13%	620 -37%	685 -30%	859 -13%	825 -16%
WiFi v1.3	864	510 -41%	541 -37%	515 -40%	824 -5%	643 -26%
Load	212	218 3%	233 10%	198 -7%	217 2%	277 31%

Pro

+ Aparência e sensação de alta qualidade

+ 6 GB de RAM

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Longas durações da bateria

+ NFC

+ BT 5.0

+ Armazenamento UFS de 128 GB

+ O SoC Helio se desempenha bem ...

Contra

- ... embora a unidade gráfica seja bastante fraca para fins de jogos

- Produção de calor

- Alto-falantes

- (Versão chinesa: sem banda LTE 20 ou Widevine L3)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: SoC Pseudo Gaming se encontra com Cam 64-MP

In Review: Redmi Note 8 Pro. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

O mais recente smartphone de gama média da Redmi deixa uma boa impressão em nosso teste geral e, considerando o preço de cerca de 220 Euros (~US$ 244) para a versão internacional, não merece muitas críticas. Dito isto, a produção de calor em conjunto com o comportamento de afogamento do SoC, bem como o alto-falante mono bastante medíocre e a posição do sensor de digitais, devem ser levados em consideração.

Embora o Redmi Note 8 Pro não deva necessariamente ser a primeira escolha para os jogadores, atualmente, ainda é um dos melhores smartphones de gama média.

Embora o Note 8 impulsionado por um Snapdragon possa parecer uma escolha melhor no papel, o SoC Pro da MediaTek é capaz de produzir resultados muito convincentes durante o uso diário. Aqui, o nível de desempenho é bom na prática e o SoC tem um desempenho tão bom quanto um chip Qualcomm da série 700.

Diferentemente do Note 8, o modelo Pro do smartphone Redmi brilha com uma sólida câmera principal. O Samsung GW1 captura fotos altamente detalhadas à luz do dia que o equiparam com o sensor de imagem Sony IMX 582.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro - 11/18/2019 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 71%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

26 / 64 → 41%

Desempenho da aplicação

70 / 86 → 81%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 79%

Camera

64%

Médio

75%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: SoC Pseudo Gaming se encontra com Cam 64-MP

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-11-21 (Update: 2019-11-23)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Dead Trigger 2

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: SoC Pseudo Gaming se encontra com Cam 64-MP

More articles related to this device

Price comparison