Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Brand: Xiaomi

Quality does not have to be expensive.

Com o Redmi Note 5A Prime, a Xiaomi oferece um dispositivo robusto de 5,5 polegadas por um preço baixo. Além de uma câmera selfie de 16 MP, ele vem com um sensor de infravermelhos por menos de 200 Euros (~$233). Nesta análise, esclarecemos que compromissos devem ser feitos devido ao baixo preço recomendado pela fabricante.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/24/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (B2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (B1/2/5/8), 4G FDD-LTE (B1/3/4/5/7/8/20), 4G TDD-LTE (B38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 153 x 76.2

Bateria

3080 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 32 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 240 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1080p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED flash, 1080p@30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1 speaker, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo MicroUSB, Ferramenta SIM, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0,504 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1,683 W/kg

peso

153 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g

Preço

200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.6 MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 MBit/s
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.1 MBit/s -1%
Gigaset GS185 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.7 MBit/s -4%
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 MBit/s +5%
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 MBit/s +2%
Gigaset GS185 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.8 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 MBit/s -16%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

Test chart (detail) Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime


474 cd/m²	480 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	469 cd/m²	459 cd/m²
455 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	455 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 463.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 469 cd/m²
Contraste: 782:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Alcatel 3X IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	HTC Desire 12 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Gigaset GS185 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		18%	-26%	1%	-43%
Brightness middle	469	429 -9%	418 -11%	701 49%	426 -9%
Brightness	464	421 -9%	414 -11%	720 55%	412 -11%
Brightness Distribution	92	84 -9%	93 1%	87 -5%	86 -7%
Black Level *	0.6	0.13 78%	0.7 -17%	0.5 17%	0.7 -17%
Contrast	782	3300 322%	597 -24%	1402 79%	609 -22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.31	4.86 -47%	4.2 -27%	4.97 -50%	5.3 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.68	8.83 -32%	8.3 -24%	13.31 -99%	10.2 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	6 -150%	4.7 -96%	3.3 -38%	6.3 -163%
Gamma	2.155 ^102%	2.231 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.2 ^100%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6626 ^98%	8103 ^80%	7394 ^88%	8056 ^81%	8073 ^81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	45762 Points
Alcatel 3X	31718 Points -31%
Umidigi S2 Lite	43125 Points -6%
Gigaset GS185	37339 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (42643 - 46814, n=11)	44884 Points -2%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	57683 Points
Alcatel 3X	42032 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	56497 Points -2%
Umidigi S2 Lite	56639 Points -2%
Gigaset GS185	45092 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (56672 - 59326, n=4)	57644 Points 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	Points
Alcatel 3X	4711 Points
HTC Desire 12 Plus	5393 Points
Umidigi S2 Lite	4371 Points
Gigaset GS185	3961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4316 - 5438, n=10)	4876 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	3702 Points
Alcatel 3X	3210 Points -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	4759 Points +29%
Umidigi S2 Lite	3348 Points -10%
Gigaset GS185	3229 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3538 - 3928, n=11)	3737 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	948 Points
Alcatel 3X	206 Points -78%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1158 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	886 Points -7%
Gigaset GS185	676 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (282 - 1072, n=9)	792 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +586%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1774 Points
Alcatel 3X	1302 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	2898 Points +63%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1870 Points +5%
Gigaset GS185	1217 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1489 - 1980, n=9)	1734 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +483%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	791 Points
Alcatel 3X	982 Points +24%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	849 Points +7%
Umidigi S2 Lite	840 Points +6%
Gigaset GS185	617 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (557 - 1224, n=9)	831 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +792%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	788 Points
Alcatel 3X	150 Points -81%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	965 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	645 Points -18%
Gigaset GS185	440 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (591 - 789, n=9)	759 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +2184%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	729 Points
Alcatel 3X	9 Points -99%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	756 Points +4%
Umidigi S2 Lite	607 Points -17%
Gigaset GS185	632 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (10 - 744, n=9)	543 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +116%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	678 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	741 Points +9%
Umidigi S2 Lite	624 Points -8%
Gigaset GS185	683 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (637 - 691, n=10)	663 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +727%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2576 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3272 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite	2671 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185	1871 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2210 - 2889, n=10)	2610 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +512%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2204 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1762 Points -20%
Gigaset GS185	1460 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1782 - 2512, n=8)	2115 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +470%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	9915 Points
Alcatel 3X	3418 Points -66%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12604 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9774 Points -1%
Gigaset GS185	6125 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (8137 - 9961, n=10)	9688 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	10202 Points
Alcatel 3X	2898 Points -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12347 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9716 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185	5474 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7924 - 10302, n=10)	9970 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	9027 Points
Alcatel 3X	9188 Points +2%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13596 Points +51%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9984 Points +11%
Gigaset GS185	10496 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7095 - 9345, n=10)	8887 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	602 Points
Alcatel 3X	151 Points -75%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	810 Points +35%
Umidigi S2 Lite	547 Points -9%
Gigaset GS185	68 Points -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (465 - 635, n=11)	599 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +598%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	533 Points
Alcatel 3X	125 Points -77%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	716 Points +34%
Umidigi S2 Lite	477 Points -11%
Gigaset GS185	54 Points -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (404 - 566, n=11)	525 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +789%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1107 Points
Alcatel 3X	538 Points -51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1504 Points +36%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1127 Points +2%
Gigaset GS185	867 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (995 - 1360, n=11)	1188 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	320 Points
Alcatel 3X	94 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	441 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite	378 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (230 - 341, n=11)	313 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +839%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	265 Points
Alcatel 3X	76 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	367 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite	317 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (188 - 281, n=11)	258 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +1095%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1148 Points
Alcatel 3X	546 Points -52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1521 Points +32%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1170 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1016 - 1340, n=11)	1192 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +184%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	20 fps
Alcatel 3X	9 fps -55%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	34 fps +70%
Umidigi S2 Lite	25 fps +25%
Gigaset GS185	13 fps -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (9.7 - 28, n=11)	20.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +333%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	17 fps
Alcatel 3X	4.9 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	21 fps +24%
Umidigi S2 Lite	17 fps 0%
Gigaset GS185	7.6 fps -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11 - 25, n=11)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +1641%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	15 fps
Alcatel 3X	5 fps -67%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	18 fps +20%
Umidigi S2 Lite	13 fps -13%
Gigaset GS185	5.6 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.5 - 16, n=11)	11.1 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +407%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	7.6 fps
Alcatel 3X	2.2 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	9.2 fps +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite	6.9 fps -9%
Gigaset GS185	2.8 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.6 - 15, n=11)	7.51 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +2203%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	11 fps
Alcatel 3X	3.1 fps -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13 fps +18%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9.9 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3.5 - 12, n=11)	8.68 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +506%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	4.9 fps
Alcatel 3X	1.3 fps -73%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	6 fps +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.6 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.3 - 5, n=11)	4.11 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +2437%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	5.6 fps
Alcatel 3X	1.6 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	7 fps +25%
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.8 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 5.9, n=11)	4.21 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +784%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2.7 fps
Alcatel 3X	0.77 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3.4 fps +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite	2.4 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 2.8, n=11)	2.55 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +2670%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS185 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	22.16 Points +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	19.18 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (16.5 - 20.6, n=11)	18.2 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	17.76 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	17.55 Points
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	15.41 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1071%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	3993 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	3506 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	3293 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2689 - 3314, n=11)	3112 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	3084 Points -6%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	2838 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	17275 ms * -27%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	13666 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	13586 ms *
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	13114 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11007 - 13586, n=11)	12667 ms * +7%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	11572 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	Alcatel 3X	HTC Desire 12 Plus	Umidigi S2 Lite	Gigaset GS185	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-19%	-2%	-19%	-25%	-6%	969%
Sequential Read 256KB	287.1	260.5 -9%	252.8 -12%	271 -6%	275.7 -4%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -16%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 557%
Sequential Write 256KB	120.3	127.7 6%	135.6 13%	75 -38%	45.54 -62%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -16%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 1123%
Random Read 4KB	47.87	26.05 -46%	65.7 37%	36.4 -24%	31.71 -34%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -10%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 481%
Random Write 4KB	17.15	9.62 -44%	9.16 -47%	11.6 -32%	9.05 -47%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 31%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 1713%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	77.5 -8%	84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	51.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	59.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	56.5 -6%	59.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -12%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.3 °C	38.7 °C	38.8 °C
40.9 °C	37.5 °C	40.6 °C
39.9 °C	37.8 °C	38.8 °C

Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 39.5 °C


34.9 °C	39.4 °C	42.6 °C
35.8 °C	38.9 °C	40 °C
35.9 °C	38.9 °C	39.5 °C

Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	1.8 / 2.4 / 2.9 Watt
Carga	4 / 6.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-11%	31%	10%	35%	3%	3%
Idle Minimum *	1.8	2 -11%	0.68 62%	0.8 56%	0.54 70%	1.369 ?(0.57 - 4.02, n=11) 24%	0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Average *	2.4	2.5 -4%	2.05 15%	1.6 33%	1.74 27%	2.55 ?(1.4 - 6, n=11) -6%	1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	3.2 -10%	2.12 27%	3.5 -21%	1.78 39%	2.86 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=11) 1%	1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years) 45%
Load Average *	4	5.2 -30%	3 25%	4.6 -15%	3.55 11%	4.38 ?(2.89 - 7.34, n=11) -10%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -64%
Load Maximum *	6.3	6.3 -0%	4.57 27%	6.5 -3%	4.66 26%	5.95 ?(4 - 9.6, n=11) 6%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) -57%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		10h 47min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	647	675 4%	545 -16%	645 0%	658 2%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria sólida

+ Boa relação de preço-desempenho

+ Sensor infravermelho

Contra

- Tela com relação de contraste baixa

- Sem USB Type-C

Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Test device supplied by:

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime oferece um smartphone sólido para usuários que valorizam muito uma boa câmera frontal. Na maioria dos benchmarks, o smartphone Xiaomi ultrapassa os dispositivos na mesma faixa de preço em termos de desempenho do sistema; apenas aplicativos graficamente exigentes funcionam um pouco mais devagar no telefone Redmi.

Compradores em potencial podem esperar um smartphone com boa duração de bateria, um monitor de 5,5 polegadas e uma câmera decente. O Redmi Note 5A Prime é mais do que capaz de lidar com fotos ocasionais, aplicativos simples e jogos menos exigentes.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime é um bom smartphone para usuários casuais e brilha com sua boa relação preço-desempenho.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime - 07/15/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

74%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

79%

Conectividade

41 / 60 → 68%

Peso

92%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

21 / 63 → 33%

Desempenho da aplicação

29 / 70 → 41%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

88 / 91 → 97%

Camera

75%

Médio

72%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-08- 1)

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison