Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Alcatel 3X | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 469 cd/m²
Contraste: 782:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Alcatel 3X IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | HTC Desire 12 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Gigaset GS185 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 18% | -26% | 1% | -43% | |
Brightness middle | 469 | 429 -9% | 418 -11% | 701 49% | 426 -9% |
Brightness | 464 | 421 -9% | 414 -11% | 720 55% | 412 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 93 1% | 87 -5% | 86 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.13 78% | 0.7 -17% | 0.5 17% | 0.7 -17% |
Contrast | 782 | 3300 322% | 597 -24% | 1402 79% | 609 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 4.86 -47% | 4.2 -27% | 4.97 -50% | 5.3 -60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.68 | 8.83 -32% | 8.3 -24% | 13.31 -99% | 10.2 -53% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 6 -150% | 4.7 -96% | 3.3 -38% | 6.3 -163% |
Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.231 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6626 98% | 8103 80% | 7394 88% | 8056 81% | 8073 81% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (42643 - 46814, n=11) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (56672 - 59326, n=4) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4316 - 5438, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Gigaset GS185 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3538 - 3928, n=11) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3.5 - 12, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | |
Alcatel 3X | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
Umidigi S2 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.3 - 5, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (16.5 - 20.6, n=11) | |
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67) | |
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2689 - 3314, n=11) | |
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66) | |
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) | |
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67) | |
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11007 - 13586, n=11) | |
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime | Alcatel 3X | HTC Desire 12 Plus | Umidigi S2 Lite | Gigaset GS185 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | -2% | -19% | -25% | -6% | 952% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 287.1 | 260.5 -9% | 252.8 -12% | 271 -6% | 275.7 -4% | 242 ? -16% | 1839 ? 541% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 120.3 | 127.7 6% | 135.6 13% | 75 -38% | 45.54 -62% | 100.5 ? -16% | 1425 ? 1085% |
Random Read 4KB | 47.87 | 26.05 -46% | 65.7 37% | 36.4 -24% | 31.71 -34% | 43.2 ? -10% | 277 ? 479% |
Random Write 4KB | 17.15 | 9.62 -44% | 9.16 -47% | 11.6 -32% | 9.05 -47% | 22.4 ? 31% | 309 ? 1702% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.4 ? | 79.7 ? -6% | 83.4 ? -1% | 77.5 -8% | 84.3 ? 0% | 71.8 ? -15% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.2 ? | 51.5 ? -14% | 59.9 ? 0% | 56.5 -6% | 59.7 ? -1% | 52.9 ? -12% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.8 / 2.4 / 2.9 Watt |
Carga |
4 / 6.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh | Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh | Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | 31% | 10% | 35% | 3% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 2 -11% | 0.68 62% | 0.8 56% | 0.54 70% | 1.369 ? 24% | 0.894 ? 50% |
Idle Average * | 2.4 | 2.5 -4% | 2.05 15% | 1.6 33% | 1.74 27% | 2.55 ? -6% | 1.456 ? 39% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 3.2 -10% | 2.12 27% | 3.5 -21% | 1.78 39% | 2.86 ? 1% | 1.616 ? 44% |
Load Average * | 4 | 5.2 -30% | 3 25% | 4.6 -15% | 3.55 11% | 4.38 ? -10% | 6.45 ? -61% |
Load Maximum * | 6.3 | 6.3 -0% | 4.57 27% | 6.5 -3% | 4.66 26% | 5.95 ? 6% | 9.8 ? -56% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh | Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh | Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 647 | 675 4% | 545 -16% | 645 0% | 658 2% |
Pro
Contra
O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime oferece um smartphone sólido para usuários que valorizam muito uma boa câmera frontal. Na maioria dos benchmarks, o smartphone Xiaomi ultrapassa os dispositivos na mesma faixa de preço em termos de desempenho do sistema; apenas aplicativos graficamente exigentes funcionam um pouco mais devagar no telefone Redmi.
Compradores em potencial podem esperar um smartphone com boa duração de bateria, um monitor de 5,5 polegadas e uma câmera decente. O Redmi Note 5A Prime é mais do que capaz de lidar com fotos ocasionais, aplicativos simples e jogos menos exigentes.
O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime é um bom smartphone para usuários casuais e brilha com sua boa relação preço-desempenho.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
- 07/15/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker