Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 448 cd/m²
Contraste: 2252:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Maze Alpha X IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Huawei Honor 7X IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -70% | 1% | 5% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 518 | 497 -4% | 761 47% | 533.2 3% | 393 -24% |
| Brightness | 532 | 478 -10% | 723 36% | 511 -4% | 365 -31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 87 -7% | 90 -4% | 88 -6% | 85 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.6 -161% | 0.69 -200% | 0.35 -52% | 0.29 -26% |
| Contrast | 2252 | 828 -63% | 1103 -51% | 1523 -32% | 1355 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.66 | 11.6 -105% | 2.4 58% | 2.83 50% | 5.28 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.32 | 22.1 -114% | 5.2 50% | 6.72 35% | 9 13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 13.5 -99% | 1.8 74% | 3.7 46% | 4.2 38% |
| Gamma | 2.269 97% | 2.93 75% | 2.21 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.6 85% |
| CCT | 8564 76% | 9955 65% | 6312 103% | 6918 94% | 7086 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 7618, n=11) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5611 - 6277, n=11) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4278 - 5041, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (30 - 40, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (13 - 18, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 12, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 10, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.1 - 7.4, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei Honor 7X | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | Maze Alpha X | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Huawei Honor 7X | Huawei Y7 2018 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | 64% | -0% | -19% | -6% | 986% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 287.6 | 247.4 -14% | 286.6 0% | 265.3 -8% | 256 -11% | 242 ? -16% | 1887 ? 556% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 121.6 | 162.2 33% | 216.1 78% | 127.9 5% | 71.5 -41% | 100.5 ? -17% | 1471 ? 1110% |
| Random Read 4KB | 48.9 | 70.3 44% | 58.4 19% | 81.4 66% | 38.8 -21% | 43.2 ? -12% | 278 ? 469% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.3 | 11.61 -29% | 62.8 285% | 20.24 24% | 9.5 -42% | 22.4 ? 37% | 311 ? 1808% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.4 | 81 ? -3% | 83.7 ? 0% | 52.7 -37% | 85 2% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.4 | 74 ? 19% | 62.1 ? 0% | 30.55 -51% | 61.5 -1% | 52.9 ? -15% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 58 fps | ||
| minimal | 59 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Smooth | 25 fps | ||
| Balanced | 25 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Honor 7X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.06 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 2.6 / 2.9 Watt |
| Carga |
5 / 8.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 38% | 12% | 19% | 11% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.9 10% | 0.5 50% | 1.02 -2% | 0.9 10% | 0.944 ? 6% | 0.88 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 2.6 | 2.14 18% | 1.78 32% | 2.46 5% | 1.9 27% | 2.22 ? 15% | 1.444 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 2.18 25% | 1.81 38% | 2.51 13% | 2.3 21% | 2.54 ? 12% | 1.6 ? 45% |
| Load Average * | 5 | 3.96 21% | 3.3 34% | 4.16 17% | 4.7 6% | 4.51 ? 10% | 6.57 ? -31% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.2 | 5.81 29% | 5.14 37% | 5.87 28% | 5.7 30% | 7.37 ? 10% | 9.91 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -0% | -29% | -21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1824 | 1624 -11% | 1846 1% | 1111 -39% | 1305 -28% |
| H.264 | 902 | 542 -40% | 687 -24% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 872 | 603 -31% | 702 -19% | 664 -24% | 624 -28% |
| Load | 258 | 240 -7% | 404 57% | 199 -23% | 245 -5% |
Pro
Contra
O Redmi Note 5 é o epítome da ética da Xiaomi de lançar dispositivos acessíveis mas de alto desempenho e demonstra por que muitos anseiam por um lançamento europeu de seus dispositivos. O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 é um smartphone acessível que tem muita potência, boa duração de bateria, Wi-Fi 802.11 ac rápido e uma tela brilhante e de alto contraste por menos de €240 (~$277). O Note 5 também tem um bom alto-falante, enquanto a qualidade das chamadas é decente e o suporte para Quick Charge é útil. O moderno SoC proporciona ao Note 5 velocidades LTE relativamente rápidas, Bluetooth 5.0 e deve deixa-lo preparado para o futuro previsível.
No entanto, existem algumas falhas. A temperatura de cor e uma tonalidade azul da tela não são boas, e também não é o consumo de energia relativamente alto, apesar da impressionante duração da bateria. O MIUI também emprega um gerenciamento agressivo de aplicativos em seu detrimento. Isso pode levar a problemas com aplicativos que precisam ser executados em segundo plano, mas ajuda a reduzir o consumo de energia e prolongar a duração da bateria. A câmera é a única área em que o Note 5 é claramente um dispositivo de gama média, mas as fotos são adequadas em geral. As temperaturas da superfície também são boas, embora possam ser melhores sob uso intenso.
O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 é ótimo custo-benefício. O dispositivo tem excelente desempenho pelo seu preço e oferece uma tela brilhante, entre outros destaques.
O Note 5 oferece um desempenho excelente pelo seu preço e, muitas vezes, supera até os concorrentes mais caros. O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 recebe uma recomendação nossa apenas por esse motivo, apesar de suas pequenas desvantagens.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- 06/25/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
