Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: Um smartphone 5G com uma tela de 120 Hz a um preço de barganha
Device Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | Realme XT SD 712, Adreno 616 | 183 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | ||
81.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Xiaomi Mi 9T SD 730, Adreno 618 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.39" | 2340x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Nokia 7.2 SD 660, Adreno 512 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
79.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 159 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.15" | 2312x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Realme XT | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Realme XT | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition |
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 658 cd/m²
Contraste: 1343:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Realme XT Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 7.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition IPS, 2312x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -64% | -1% | -47% | -16% | -40% | |
Brightness middle | 658 | 414 -37% | 589 -10% | 604 -8% | 589 -10% | 507 -23% |
Brightness | 643 | 414 -36% | 589 -8% | 593 -8% | 589 -8% | 481 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 96 3% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 88 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.4 18% | 0.38 22% | |||
Contrast | 1343 | 1510 12% | 1334 -1% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.4 -144% | 2.5 -39% | 5.1 -183% | 2.22 -23% | 4.72 -162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 11.2 -155% | 4.9 -11% | 10.3 -134% | 8.24 -87% | 7.84 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.3 -13% | 1.6 58% | 6.4 -68% | 2.6 32% | 5.5 -45% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.111 104% | 2.158 102% |
CCT | 6255 104% | 6532 100% | 6544 99% | 8149 80% | 6508 100% | 7596 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 43 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (4227 - 8690, n=8, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (7571 - 19281, n=9, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2625 - 7017, n=9, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | Realme XT | Xiaomi Mi 9T | Nokia 7.2 | Samsung Galaxy A51 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -12% | -55% | -17% | 48% | 17% | 215% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 890 | 483.8 -46% | 492.7 -45% | 290.8 -67% | 496.1 -44% | 800 -10% | 760 ? -15% | 1838 ? 107% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 312.8 | 173.7 -44% | 179.2 -43% | 161.4 -48% | 184.9 -41% | 391.1 25% | 297 ? -5% | 1430 ? 357% |
Random Read 4KB | 96.8 | 112.5 16% | 128.6 33% | 79.6 -18% | 110.8 14% | 198.7 105% | 152.9 ? 58% | 278 ? 187% |
Random Write 4KB | 101 | 25 -75% | 107.8 7% | 13.38 -87% | 104.4 3% | 171.6 70% | 131.6 ? 30% | 310 ? 207% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9: Legends
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme XT audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.66 / 2.37 / 2.42 Watt |
Carga |
6.8 / 7.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Realme XT 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 38% | 44% | 1% | 11% | 1% | 9% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.66 | 0.55 17% | 0.54 18% | 0.77 -17% | 0.9 -36% | 0.95 -44% | 0.965 ? -46% | 0.895 ? -36% |
Idle Average * | 2.37 | 1.39 41% | 0.95 60% | 2.32 2% | 1.7 28% | 2.1 11% | 1.899 ? 20% | 1.447 ? 39% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.42 | 1.44 40% | 1.08 55% | 2.41 -0% | 1.8 26% | 2.4 1% | 2.07 ? 14% | 1.608 ? 34% |
Load Average * | 6.8 | 2.97 56% | 2.7 60% | 4.44 35% | 5.2 24% | 4.2 38% | 3.98 ? 41% | 6.41 ? 6% |
Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 4.92 34% | 5.4 28% | 8.79 -17% | 6.6 12% | 7.7 -3% | 6.19 ? 17% | 9.61 ? -28% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Realme XT 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | 25% | -29% | 1% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 2083 | 2138 3% | 1689 -19% | 1359 -35% | ||
H.264 | 734 | 1208 65% | 846 15% | 802 9% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 802 | 718 -10% | 991 24% | 570 -29% | 698 -13% | 719 -10% |
Load | 243 | 258 6% | 289 19% | 223 -8% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - A Xiaomi redefine o mercado de smartphones de gama média, mais uma vez
O Redmi K30 não só parece ótimo, mas também está incrivelmente bem equipado por um preço de cerca de 300 Euros (~US$ 324). A conectividade 5G e um painel de 120 Hz, por exemplo, eram reservados anteriormente exclusivamente para smartphones carros-chefes. O novo sensor de câmera Sony IMX686 também teve bom desempenho em fotos diurnas e define padrões no campo das câmeras de smartphones de gama média. O novo SoC Qualcomm também oferece desempenho suficiente para os jogos atuais.
Se a Xiaomi começar a vender um equivalente europeu do Redmi K30 5G, dificilmente você poderá fazer uma escolha melhor no momento, por cerca de 300 Euros (~US$ 324) do que o mais recente aparelho de gama média da empresa.
Enquanto o Redmi K30 5G tem muito a oferecer, ainda encontramos alguns problemas cem nossa unidade de teste. Ignorando as limitações do uso de uma versão chinesa na Europa, o Redmi K30 carece dos refinamentos de tela que um painel OLED ofereceria. Na prática, isso significa que o Redmi K30 tem uma taxa de contraste mais fraca do que seus pares e também possui halos típicos de IPS. O painel também usa PWM, mas este é o caso da maioria dos painéis OLED. Os microfones de nossa unidade de teste também não nos convenceram, mas uma segunda unidade de teste deveria confirmar se esse é um problema localizado ou não. No geral, o Redmi K30 5G é um excelente smartphone de gama média e esperamos vê-lo chegar em breve à Europa.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
-
02/17/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich