Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8: Telefone de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões

Name: Xiaomi Redmi 8
Brand: Xiaomi

A Redmi 8 evolution.

O uso diário revela diferenças inesperadamente grandes entre o Redmi 8 e seu irmão, o Redmi 8A. Discutiremos abaixo em quais áreas o Redmi 8 barato melhora o Redmi 8A e porque seu preço sugerido de 115 Euros (~ $127) vale a pena.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Redmi Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.22 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 49 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Type-C, Miracast, LED de status, rádio FM, emissor IV

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 156.5 x 75.4

Bateria

5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12 MP (f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 2 MP, Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 1.12 µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB-C, ferramenta SIM, carcaça, MIUI 11, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.48 W/kg, Head - 0.231 W/kg. LTE Cat 4/5 (150/75 Mbps), fanless

peso

188 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g

Preço

140 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Device comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
76.1 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Xiaomi Redmi 8 SD 439, Adreno 505	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.22"	1520x720
74.5 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Xiaomi Redmi 8A SD 439, Adreno 505	188 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.22"	1520x720
80.7 % v6 ^(old)	04/2019	Nokia 4.2 SD 439, Adreno 505	161 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.71"	1520x720
75.5 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	Samsung Galaxy A20e Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2	141 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.80"	1560x720
75 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	LG K50 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	170 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.26"	1520x720
80.5 % v6 ^(old)	06/2019	Wiko View 3 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	178 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.26"	1520x720

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 (51^min - 59^max) MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.3 (49^min - 60^max) MBit/s +10%
Wiko View 3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55 (47^min - 62^max) MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash	50.2 (24^min - 56^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (23^min - 50^max) MBit/s -21%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (24^min - 40^max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AX12
Wiko View 3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	70 (57^min - 83^max) MBit/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (47^min - 67^max) MBit/s +7%
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (53^min - 57^max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash	56.2 (47^min - 58^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	56 (54^min - 58^max) MBit/s 0%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (35^min - 52^max) MBit/s -6%

Xiaomi Redmi 8; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.3 (47-58)

Xiaomi Redmi 8; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø49.4 (24-56)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Redmi 8

Google Pixel 4

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Redmi 8

Google Pixel 4

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Redmi 8

Google Pixel 4

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8: 5.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 8.14 ∆E


470 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	525 cd/m²
485 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	524 cd/m²
491 cd/m²	539 cd/m²	515 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 516 cd/m² Minimum: 1.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 2308:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Xiaomi Redmi 8 IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.2"	Xiaomi Redmi 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.2"	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8"	LG K50 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"	Wiko View 3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"
Screen		-47%	-54%	-82%	-45%	-28%
Brightness middle	554	441 -20%	445 -20%	475 -14%	489 -12%	574 4%
Brightness	516	421 -18%	424 -18%	473 -8%	453 -12%	552 7%
Brightness Distribution	85	89 5%	91 7%	93 9%	85 0%	91 7%
Black Level *	0.24	0.38 -58%	0.26 -8%	0.35 -46%	0.42 -75%	0.19 21%
Contrast	2308	1161 -50%	1712 -26%	1357 -41%	1164 -50%	3021 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	4.46 -72%	5.9 -127%	6.8 -162%	4.75 -83%	5.5 -112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.9	8.01 -63%	9.3 -90%	13.4 -173%	7.75 -58%	9.5 -94%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	5.4 -100%	6.8 -152%	8.7 -222%	4.6 -70%	5 -85%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.146 ^103%	2.2 ^100%	2.33 ^94%	2.164 ^102%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	6814 ^95%	7901 ^82%	8443 ^77%	9385 ^69%	7510 ^87%	7610 ^85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 33.2 ms rise
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 35.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	176 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	177 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (176 - 177, n=3)	176.7 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +427%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	812 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	809 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (809 - 836, n=3)	819 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +271%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	252 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	272 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (252 - 272, n=3)	265 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +1556%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	Points
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	6076 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6026 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points +14%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4635 Points -24%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6912 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (5880 - 6228, n=6)	6095 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	4664 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	4708 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points +14%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4052 Points -13%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5135 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4412 - 4791, n=6)	4632 Points -1%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	835 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	822 Points -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points -12%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	480 Points -43%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	428 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (802 - 835, n=6)	820 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +403%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	735 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	719 Points -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points -13%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	423 Points -42%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	370 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (704 - 735, n=6)	720 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +545%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1602 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1654 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points +3%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	911 Points -43%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	943 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1561 - 1654, n=6)	1593 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	835 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	826 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points -9%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	742 Points -11%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	513 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (807 - 835, n=6)	826 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +1237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	735 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	725 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points -10%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	701 Points -5%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	452 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (712 - 735, n=6)	727 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +2596%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1602 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1618 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points +1%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points -42%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	975 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1516 - 1618, n=6)	1588 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +213%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	448 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	446 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points +17%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	305 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (439 - 448, n=6)	445 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +587%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	372 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	369 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points +19%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	257 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (364 - 372, n=6)	369 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +774%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1598 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1657 Points +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points +2%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	897 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1575 - 1657, n=6)	1613 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	505 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	501 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points +4%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	493 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (492 - 505, n=6)	500 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +1421%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	432 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	418 Points -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points +2%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	434 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (413 - 432, n=6)	420 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +2541%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1582 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1627 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points +3%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1500 - 1657, n=6)	1597 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +190%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	501 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	495 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (490 - 502, n=6)	496 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points +467%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	411 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	406 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (401 - 412, n=6)	407 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points +651%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	2118 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	2135 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2118 - 2172, n=6)	2139 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points +28%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	34 fps -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps -11%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	26 fps -26%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	27 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (21 - 35, n=6)	32.2 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +145%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	22 fps -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps -13%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	19 fps -17%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	20 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (22 - 23, n=6)	22.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +1113%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	18 fps -5%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps +5%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	17 fps -11%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	17 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.3 - 19, n=6)	15.4 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +295%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	9.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	9.7 fps -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps +12%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	9.8 fps 0%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.7 - 19, n=6)	11.3 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +1574%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	13 fps -7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps 0%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 fps -29%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6 - 14, n=6)	12.2 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +366%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	6.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6.4 fps -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps -2%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6 fps -9%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.2 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)	6.43 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +1665%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	7.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	7.1 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps +21%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.9 fps -45%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.7 fps -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)	6.48 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +569%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	3.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.5 fps -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps +17%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2.8 fps -22%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2.9 fps -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)	3.53 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +1853%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	6.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6.7 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps +16%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.8 fps +1%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.8 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)	5.98 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +636%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	3.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.6 fps -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps +8%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.7 fps 0%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.7 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)	3.65 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +2046%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.9 fps -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps +20%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.1 fps +3%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.3 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2 - 4.1, n=6)	3.63 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +828%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1.2 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1.2 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps +17%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps +17%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.6 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)	1.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +2533%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1294 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1090 Points -16%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1608 Points +24%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	323 Points -75%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1106 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1090 - 1312, n=6)	1236 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +384%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	2587 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	2271 Points -12%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3372 Points +30%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2165 Points -16%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2619 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2238 - 2687, n=6)	2511 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +292%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1287 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	758 Points -41%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2008 Points +56%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	661 Points -49%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1019 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (655 - 1335, n=6)	1102 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +422%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	1009 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	999 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	893 Points -11%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	778 Points -23%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	799 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (995 - 1009, n=6)	1003 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +1561%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	849 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	821 Points -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1106 Points +30%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 Points -99%
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	703 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (816 - 1083, n=6)	874 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +83%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	94601 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	84645 Points -11%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	95835 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (84645 - 99193, n=4)	93569 Points -1%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	41690 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	40746 Points -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	41127 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (40746 - 41690, n=4)	41220 Points -1%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	10803 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	9258 Points -14%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9335 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9258 - 10803, n=4)	10049 Points -7%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	30734 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	27672 Points -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	28689 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (27672 - 30734, n=4)	29440 Points -4%
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096	11374 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6969 Points -39%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	16684 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6969 - 16684, n=4)	12860 Points +13%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +615%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.49 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	16.68 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)	16.4 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	15.96 Points -4%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.92 Points -5%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	12.93 Points -22%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	39.08 Points +53%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	27.09 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)	26.3 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	25.62 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	25.25 Points -1%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	22.82 Points -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +668%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.63 runs/min +24%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	18.23 runs/min +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)	18 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	17.4 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	17.4 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +346%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points +45%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)	35.2 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	33 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	32 Points -3%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	26 Points -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +701%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points +63%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)	4731 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	4585 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	4512 Points -2%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	4258 Points -7%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	4114 Points -10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	12799 ms * -28%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	11757 ms * -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)	10127 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)	9976 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)	9963 ms * -0%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768 ms * +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546 ms * +44%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +84%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi 8	Xiaomi Redmi 8A	Nokia 4.2	Samsung Galaxy A20e	LG K50	Wiko View 3	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		9%	-38%	5%	-9%	-8%	46%	1382%
Sequential Read 256KB	285.7	282 -1%	220.4 -23%	300.4 5%	263.4 -8%	287.3 1%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -4%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 542%
Sequential Write 256KB	202.6	106.4 -47%	18.17 -91%	103.6 -49%	78.9 -61%	132.4 -35%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -13%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 604%
Random Read 4KB	79	73.1 -7%	17.51 -78%	79.8 1%	52.1 -34%	55.2 -30%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -25%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 252%
Random Write 4KB	7.33	15.8 116%	4.31 -41%	13.18 80%	12.03 64%	8.98 23%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 337%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 4129%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.9 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	86.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	78.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	81.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	61.7 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	65.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	58.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -8%

PUBG Mobile

Xiaomi Redmi 8; Smooth: Ø24.8 (22-26)

Xiaomi Redmi 8; Balanced: Ø23.9 (14-26)

Asphalt 9: Legends

Xiaomi Redmi 8; High Quality: Ø20.5 (13-31)

Xiaomi Redmi 8; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (20-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


29.3 °C	29.1 °C	29.7 °C
28.7 °C	28.8 °C	30.7 °C
28.3 °C	28.3 °C	28.7 °C

Máximo: 30.7 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C


26.2 °C	26.8 °C	29.5 °C
26.3 °C	26.9 °C	28.9 °C
26.7 °C	27.4 °C	27.4 °C

Máximo: 29.5 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 25.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ocioso	0.57 / 1.8 / 1.82 Watt
Carga	2.57 / 4.12 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 8A 5000 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Wiko View 3 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-41%	-15%	1%	4%	4%	-36%	-61%
Idle Minimum *	0.57	0.9 -58%	0.74 -30%	0.66 -16%	0.7 -23%	0.67 -18%	0.82 ?(0.57 - 1.28, n=6) -44%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -57%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.8 -0%	1.9 -6%	1.63 9%	1 44%	1.73 4%	2.21 ?(1.6 - 4.5, n=6) -23%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	1.82	2.4 -32%	2.21 -21%	1.67 8%	1.8 1%	1.79 2%	2.49 ?(1.73 - 4.59, n=6) -37%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	2.57	4.3 -67%	3.04 -18%	2.77 -8%	2.4 7%	2.18 15%	3.78 ?(2.57 - 5.71, n=6) -47%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -149%
Load Maximum *	4.12	6 -46%	4.15 -1%	3.66 11%	4.5 -9%	3.43 17%	5.24 ?(4.12 - 6.99, n=6) -27%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -133%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		42h 01min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 08min

	Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 8A 5000 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Wiko View 3 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		11%	-40%	-27%	-29%	-14%
Reader / Idle	2521	1903 -25%		1432 -43%
H.264	798	1193 49%		753 -6%
WiFi v1.3	1157	1145 -1%	696 -40%	715 -38%	822 -29%	995 -14%
Load	308	367 19%		250 -19%

Pro

+ Belo design

+ Bem construído

+ Bom sensor de digitais

+ Slot Dual SIM + microSD real

+ Duração da bateria muito longa

+ Boas câmeras para um telefone econômico

+ Painel IPS brilhante e rico em contraste...

Contra

- ...com uma resolução HD típica de sua classe

- Somente certificação Widevine L3, apesar da existência de uma edição global

- Desempenho típica de sua classe

- Memória lenta

- Sem NFC

Veredicto - O Xiaomi Redmi 8 define novos padrões para smartphones econômicos

The Xiaomi Redmi 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.

O Redmi 8, que é muito semelhante ao Redmi 8A no papel, é uma atualização significativa em relação a seus irmãos, mesmo que pareçam quase idênticos. O primeiro não apenas possui câmeras aprimoradas e um alto-falante melhor, mas também possui melhor conectividade e uma tela visivelmente melhorada. No geral, embora tenhamos recomendado o Redmi 8A mais barato ao analisá-lo, o Redmi 8 oferece uma relação custo/benefício ainda melhor. Em suma, o mais recente smartphone Redmi de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões para smartphones abaixo de 120 euros (~US$ 133), principalmente porque não possui deficiências sérias.

No entanto, a Xiaomi fez alguns compromissos, o que não é de surpreender, considerando o baixo preço recomendado do dispositivo. O Redmi 8 é e continua sendo um smartphone de nível de entrada. Consequentemente, a Xiaomi equipou o dispositivo com um SoC fraco, uma tela de baixa resolução, armazenamento flash eMMC e um módulo Wi-Fi lento. Por apenas 30 Euros (~US$ 33) a mais, o Redmi Note 8 é uma alternativa interessante ao Redmi 8, pois oferece desempenho notavelmente melhor com quase nenhum esforço maior.

O Xiaomi Redmi 8 oferece mais do que a maioria dos smartphones abaixo de 120 euros (~US$ 133). Se o preço é o fator limitante para o seu próximo smartphone, o Redmi 8 seria uma boa opção.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 - 2020-01-20 01/20/2020 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

82%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

42 / 70 → 59%

Peso

89%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

6 / 64 → 9%

Desempenho da aplicação

45 / 86 → 52%

Temperatura

95%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

52%

Médio

71%

76%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8: Telefone de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 2)

Device comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Asphalt 9: Legends

Xiaomi Redmi 8 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - O Xiaomi Redmi 8 define novos padrões para smartphones econômicos

More articles related to this device

Price comparison