Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 7A – o telefone com preço reduzido

Name: Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Brand: Xiaomi

Surpreendentemente acessível.

O Xiaomi Redmi 7A está disponível por US$ 100. Seu antecessor já tinha muito a oferecer, considerando seu baixo preço. O Redmi 7A, à primeira vista, parece não oferecer muitas mudanças. Será que consegue manter sua excelente relação preço / desempenho?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/14/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Redmi Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.45 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.6 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, dedicado, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.6 x 146.3 x 70.4

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.2, 1.12µm, phase detection auto focus, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, LED para notificações (uma cor), SAR value: 0.557 W/kg (head), 1.166 W/kg (body), LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mbps), fanless

peso

165 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g

Preço

100 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto E5 Play Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.6 (29^min - 61^max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 (52^min - 59^max) MBit/s +4%
Huawei Y5 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.5 (52^min - 59^max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Adreno 505, SD 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.8 (25^min - 57^max) MBit/s
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s -2%
Honor 7A Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.7 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Y5 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash	63 (56^min - 61^max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Adreno 505, SD 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash	60 (52^min - 64^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	59.6 (56^min - 61^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.5 (49^min - 57^max) MBit/s -7%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s -19%
Honor 7A Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45 MBit/s -25%

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.2 (52-64)

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53 (25-57)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Color Checker Colors. The bottom half of each box displays the reference color.


482 cd/m²	505 cd/m²	495 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	533 cd/m²	531 cd/m²
469 cd/m²	525 cd/m²	534 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 534 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 888:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212

	Xiaomi Redmi 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Motorola Moto E5 Play IPS, 960x480, 5.2"	Huawei Y5 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"
Screen		21%	25%	6%	-28%	6%
Brightness middle	533	404 -24%	417 -22%	338 -37%	369 -31%	630 18%
Brightness	506	400 -21%	395 -22%	327 -35%	358 -29%	593 17%
Brightness Distribution	88	82 -7%	88 0%	82 -7%	81 -8%	88 0%
Black Level *	0.6	0.26 57%	0.18 70%	0.27 55%	0.4 33%	0.66 -10%
Contrast	888	1554 75%	2317 161%	1252 41%	923 4%	955 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.6	4.28 24%	6.46 -15%	5.36 4%	9.75 -74%	5.79 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.4	9.97 13%	10.72 6%	9.77 14%	18.28 -60%	9.54 16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	3.5 53%	5.8 22%	6.2 16%	11.8 -59%	7 5%
Gamma	2.212 ^99%	2.213 ^99%	2.423 ^91%	2.345 ^94%	2.057 ^107%	2.176 ^101%
CCT	7974 ^82%	6899 ^94%	7839 ^83%	8460 ^77%	11971 ^54%	8420 ^77%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					78.6

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

384.6 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 384.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 384.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	863 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	825 Points -4%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	675 Points -22%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	636 Points -26%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	647 Points -25%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	839 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (863 - 903, n=4)	880 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +536%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3068 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2471 Points -19%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2820 Points -8%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1602 Points -48%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1635 Points -47%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2436 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2987 - 3267, n=4)	3141 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +391%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	5880 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6194 Points +5%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	5109 Points -13%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	4152 Points -29%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	5616 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (5880 - 6228, n=6)	6095 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	4594 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	Points -100%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	3892 Points -15%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3146 Points -32%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3209 Points -30%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4195 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4412 - 4791, n=6)	4632 Points +1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	13315 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7671 Points -42%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9584 Points -28%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6133 Points -54%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6379 Points -52%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	8452 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13151 - 13435, n=6)	13259 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	13510 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6785 Points -50%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9684 Points -28%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5487 Points -59%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5712 Points -58%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7514 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13385 - 13656, n=6)	13502 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	12673 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	14128 Points +11%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9249 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10427 Points -18%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10784 Points -15%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	15004 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12096 - 12809, n=6)	12492 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	823 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	456 Points -45%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	613 Points -26%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	58 Points -93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	239 Points -71%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	418 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (802 - 835, n=6)	820 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +411%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	724 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	403 Points -44%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	535 Points -26%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	46 Points -94%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	199 Points -73%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	362 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (704 - 735, n=6)	720 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +555%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1579 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	840 Points -47%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1259 Points -20%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	892 Points -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	819 Points -48%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	911 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1561 - 1654, n=6)	1593 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	830 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	494 Points -40%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	610 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	297 Points -64%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	296 Points -64%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	509 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (807 - 835, n=6)	826 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +1238%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	730 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	445 Points -39%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	530 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	250 Points -66%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	249 Points -66%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	451 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (712 - 735, n=6)	727 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +2600%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1594 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	807 Points -49%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1285 Points -19%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	885 Points -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	877 Points -45%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	924 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1516 - 1618, n=6)	1588 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +214%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	446 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	268 Points -40%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	308 Points -31%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	239 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (439 - 448, n=6)	445 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +591%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	370 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	225 Points -39%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	254 Points -31%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	197 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (364 - 372, n=6)	369 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +782%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1610 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	828 Points -49%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1232 Points -23%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	918 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1575 - 1657, n=6)	1613 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	501 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	305 Points -39%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	299 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (492 - 505, n=6)	500 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +1450%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	419 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	260 Points -38%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	304 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	250 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (413 - 432, n=6)	420 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +2653%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1595 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	763 Points -52%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1301 Points -18%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	940 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1500 - 1657, n=6)	1597 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +189%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	497 Points
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	262 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (490 - 502, n=6)	496 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +473%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	408 Points
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	210 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (401 - 412, n=6)	407 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +659%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	2134 Points
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1868 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2118 - 2172, n=6)	2139 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +27%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	19 fps -46%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	27 fps -23%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	14 fps -60%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	20 fps -43%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	21 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (21 - 35, n=6)	32.2 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +147%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	13 fps -43%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	16 fps -30%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps -67%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps -67%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	14 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (22 - 23, n=6)	22.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +1117%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	9.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	12 fps +21%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	14 fps +41%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6.1 fps -38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	11 fps +11%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	12 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.3 - 19, n=6)	15.4 fps +56%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +663%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.3 fps -67%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	7.1 fps -63%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps -86%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps -86%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	6.5 fps -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.7 - 19, n=6)	11.3 fps -41%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +770%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7.5 fps -46%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	10 fps -29%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7.8 fps -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6 - 14, n=6)	12.2 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4 fps -37%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	4.6 fps -28%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.3 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)	6.43 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +1731%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	7.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.2 fps -56%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	5.4 fps -26%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	3.2 fps -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)	6.48 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +555%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.9 fps -46%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2.6 fps -26%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2 fps -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)	3.53 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +1917%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.3 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)	5.98 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.3 (4.3^min) fps -38%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.3 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)	3.65 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +2057%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	4.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.7 fps -34%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.8 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2 - 4.1, n=6)	3.63 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +812%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1.2 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	0.85 fps -29%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	0.8 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)	1.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +2567%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	75175 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	61753 Points -18%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	59990 Points -20%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	63421 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (75175 - 79792, n=3)	77540 Points +3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1124 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	745 Points -34%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1055 Points -6%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	643 Points -43%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	654 Points -42%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	983 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1090 - 1312, n=6)	1236 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +460%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	2238 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1434 Points -36%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1962 Points -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1228 Points -45%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1241 Points -45%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1798 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2238 - 2687, n=6)	2511 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +354%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	655 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	607 Points -7%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1209 Points +85%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	502 Points -23%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	490 Points -25%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1421 Points +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (655 - 1335, n=6)	1102 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +933%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1007 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	482 Points -52%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	739 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	428 Points -57%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	418 Points -58%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	471 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (995 - 1009, n=6)	1003 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +1579%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1083 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	733 Points -32%
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	705 Points -35%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	649 Points -40%
Motorola Moto E5 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	720 Points -34%
Huawei Y5 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	775 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (816 - 1083, n=6)	874 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +44%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +612%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)	16.91 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)	16.4 Points -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	15.68 Points -7%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +638%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chome 76)	18.45 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)	18 runs/min -2%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)	14.7 runs/min -20%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +337%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)	35.2 Points +4%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	35 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)	34 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	30 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +690%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)	4731 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)	4701 Points
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	4603 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	4332 Points -8%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)	3389 Points -28%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	2503 Points -47%
Motorola Moto E5 Play	2412 Points -49%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)	14709 ms * -45%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms * -36%
Motorola Moto E5 Play	13477 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	10740 ms * -6%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)	10364 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)	10143 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)	9963 ms * +2%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +85%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi 7A	Xiaomi Redmi 6A	Honor 7A	Nokia 2.1	Motorola Moto E5 Play	Huawei Y5 2019	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		84%	-5%	1%	43%	1%	-37%	1521%
Sequential Read 256KB	258	277.5 8%	254.8 -1%	288.3 12%	279 8%	272.1 5%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -36%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 613%
Sequential Write 256KB	68.7	131.7 92%	72.5 6%	51.2 -25%	52.2 -24%	45.2 -34%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -37%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1974%
Random Read 4KB	57.8	33.94 -41%	39.2 -32%	50.5 -13%	46.31 -20%	62.1 7%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -62%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 379%
Random Write 4KB	9.6	52.2 444%	9.4 -2%	13.45 40%	43.16 350%	13.1 36%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -16%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 3119%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	28.83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -55%	63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -38%

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (26-31)

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø25.7 (3-30)

Xiaomi Redmi 7A; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.6 (15-30)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.5 °C	38.3 °C	37.5 °C
40.5 °C	38.5 °C	38.2 °C
40 °C	38.9 °C	38.2 °C

Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 39 °C


36.5 °C	38.7 °C	39.9 °C
36 °C	38.5 °C	39.9 °C
36.3 °C	39.2 °C	39.5 °C

Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (126.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.6 / 2.2 Watt
Carga	3.9 / 5.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi 7A 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Honor 7A 3000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto E5 Play 2120 mAh	Huawei Y5 2019 3020 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		17%	-22%	16%	-3%	-10%	-10%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.7 12%	1.3 -63%	0.7 12%	1.2 -50%	1.2 -50%	0.82 ?(0.57 - 1.28, n=6) -3%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.2 25%	1.6 -0%	1.2 25%	1.6 -0%	1.9 -19%	2.21 ?(1.6 - 4.5, n=6) -38%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	2 9%	2.9 -32%	1.9 14%	2 9%	2.4 -9%	2.49 ?(1.73 - 4.59, n=6) -13%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average *	3.9	3.4 13%	3.7 5%	3.2 18%	3.6 8%	3.3 15%	3.78 ?(2.57 - 5.71, n=6) 3%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -65%
Load Maximum *	5.4	4 26%	6.4 -19%	4.8 11%	4.5 17%	4.6 15%	5.24 ?(4.12 - 6.99, n=6) 3%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -81%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 46min

	Xiaomi Redmi 7A 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Honor 7A 3000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto E5 Play 2120 mAh	Huawei Y5 2019 3020 mAh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-23%	-5%	-55%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1543					1256 -19%
H.264	902					732 -19%
WiFi v1.3	853	761 -11%	657 -23%	809 -5%	382.9 -55%	709 -17%
Load	286					249 -13%

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Design de carcaça ergonômica

+ Tela brilhante

+ Bom alto-falantes

+ Software atual

Contra

- GPS bastante impreciso

- Qualidade de voz medíocre

- Sem leitor de digitais

- A tela tem relação de contraste ruim

Veredicto – Tão acessível e tão potente

Os telefones Redmi da Xiaomi são cortadores de preços - eles continuamente estabelecem novos padrões em sua faixa de preço: O Remi 7A está disponível por cerca de US$ 100 (dependendo da configuração) e oferece recursos que normalmente só vemos em smartphones que são o dobro do preço. Por exemplo, o telefone funciona com um Snapdragon 439, um SoC poderoso que oferece muito valor pelo seu dinheiro. A duração da bateria muito longa, os grandes alto-falantes e a adequação aos jogos completam o conjunto de excelentes recursos. A câmera tira fotos decentes, a tela é brilhante e o aquecimento é tolerável sob carga. As novas opções de cores dão ao telefone Xiaomi um visual moderno e fresco que também é muito confortável de segurar. Graças à função de carga rápida, o smartphone também recarrega rapidamente.

É uma coleção de pontos fortes para um dispositivo tão acessível e dificilmente qualquer concorrente nessa faixa de preço pode igualar-se a ele. O telefone inclusive supera o seu antecessor com uma maior duração da bateria e maior desempenho. O fato de os modelos Redmi A não estarem equipados com um leitor de digitais é uma vergonha, no entanto, assim como o GPS impreciso e o fone ligeiramente abafado.

Se você está procurando por um smartphone acessível e ainda quer um bom desempenho e uma bateria de longa duração, o Redmi 7A pode ser o telefone certo para você.

Podemos definitivamente recomendar o Xiaomi Redmi 7A. Apenas certifique-se de comprar a versão global de um revendedor confiável, pois você pode ter problemas com o adaptador de CA e a garantia.

Xiaomi Redmi 7A - 08/08/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

74%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

39 / 60 → 65%

Peso

91%

Bateria

96%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

32 / 63 → 50%

Desempenho da aplicação

50 / 70 → 71%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 72%

Camera

63%

Médio

72%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 7A – o telefone com preço reduzido

Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-14 (Update: 2019-08-16)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Tão acessível e tão potente

More articles related to this device

Price comparison