Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A

Name: Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Brand: Xiaomi

Next-gen budget smartphone.

Com o Redmi 6A, a Xiaomi apresenta o sucessor do acessível Redmi 5A, mantendo-o com o mesmo preço enquanto melhora o equipamento de forma significante. Avaliamos em nossa análise quais melhorias esperam pelo comprador do smartphone de 90 Euros (~$102; a partir de $90 nos EUA) e como se sai contra a concorrência.

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/19/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Serie)

Processador

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8320, Análises do: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320

Memória

2048 MB

, 2GB ou 3GB

Pantalha

5.45 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 16GB ou 32GB, 25 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (de até 256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola, microUSB

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), UMTS (B1, B8), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 147.5 x 71.5

Bateria

3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo microUSB, SIM tool, MIUI 9.6.2, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.78 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.17 W/kg, fanless

peso

145 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g

Preço

150 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 3.1 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash	100 MBit/s +80%
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	99.6 MBit/s +79%
LG K11 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.6 MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 (52^min - 59^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 3.1 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s +88%
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 MBit/s +64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	59.6 (56^min - 61^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.1 MBit/s -21%
LG K11 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.1 MBit/s -23%

Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61)

Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


368 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	443 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	404 cd/m²	434 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	429 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 404 cd/m²
Contraste: 1554:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213

	Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Gigaset GS100 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Nokia 3.1 IPS, 1440x720, 5.2"	LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Screen		-38%	-47%	-9%	-66%
Brightness middle	404	503 25%	442 9%	506 25%	394 -2%
Brightness	400	499 25%	446 12%	490 23%	385 -4%
Brightness Distribution	82	84 2%	86 5%	93 13%	93 13%
Black Level *	0.26	0.73 -181%	0.35 -35%	0.24 8%	0.66 -154%
Contrast	1554	689 -56%	1263 -19%	2108 36%	597 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.28	5.44 -27%	8.03 -88%	6.4 -50%	8.2 -92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.97	10.01 -0%	15.81 -59%	11.1 -11%	21.5 -116%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	6.8 -94%	10.4 -197%	7.5 -114%	7.5 -114%
Gamma	2.213 ^99%	2.451 ^90%	2.02 ^109%	2.2 ^100%	2.6 ^85%
CCT	6899 ^94%	6590 ^99%	10070 ^65%	8643 ^75%	7581 ^86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	825 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	681 Points -17%
Gigaset GS100	579 Points -30%
Nokia 3.1	665 Points -19%
LG K11	609 Points -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=81, last 2 years)	5474 Points +564%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	2471 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	1874 Points -24%
Gigaset GS100	1418 Points -43%
Nokia 3.1	2645 Points +7%
LG K11	2259 Points -9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	2471 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=81, last 2 years)	15062 Points +510%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	1699 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	1333 Points -22%
Nokia 3.1	1908 Points +12%
LG K11	1559 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	1699 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	12001 Points +606%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	6194 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	4559 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1	3885 Points -37%
LG K11	4241 Points -32%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6194 - 7019, n=2)	6607 Points +7%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	7671 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	6186 Points -19%
Gigaset GS100	3395 Points -56%
Nokia 3.1	8517 Points +11%
LG K11	8567 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7671 - 8580, n=2)	8126 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	6785 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	5532 Points -18%
Gigaset GS100	2878 Points -58%
Nokia 3.1	8163 Points +20%
LG K11	8177 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6785 - 7658, n=2)	7222 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	14128 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	10556 Points -25%
Gigaset GS100	9159 Points -35%
Nokia 3.1	10044 Points -29%
LG K11	10285 Points -27%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (14128 - 14822, n=2)	14475 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	456 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	55 Points -88%
Gigaset GS100	127 Points -72%
Nokia 3.1	129 Points -72%
LG K11	447 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (456 - 484, n=2)	470 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +822%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	403 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	43 Points -89%
Gigaset GS100	104 Points -74%
Nokia 3.1	103 Points -74%
LG K11	381 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (403 - 427, n=2)	415 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +1076%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	840 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	903 Points +8%
Gigaset GS100	532 Points -37%
Nokia 3.1	1099 Points +31%
LG K11	1127 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (840 - 903, n=2)	872 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +293%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	494 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	296 Points -40%
Gigaset GS100	159 Points -68%
Nokia 3.1	459 Points -7%
LG K11	453 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (494 - 517, n=2)	506 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +2149%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	445 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	249 Points -44%
Gigaset GS100	131 Points -71%
Nokia 3.1	397 Points -11%
LG K11	384 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (445 - 458, n=2)	452 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +4329%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	807 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	886 Points +10%
Gigaset GS100	611 Points -24%
Nokia 3.1	1013 Points +26%
LG K11	1207 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (807 - 943, n=2)	875 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +520%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	268 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	86 Points -68%
Nokia 3.1	186 Points -31%
LG K11	306 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (268 - 279, n=2)	274 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +1051%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	225 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	69 Points -69%
Nokia 3.1	150 Points -33%
LG K11	252 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (225 - 233, n=2)	229 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +1350%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	828 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	549 Points -34%
Nokia 3.1	1144 Points +38%
LG K11	1233 Points +49%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (828 - 903, n=2)	866 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +297%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	305 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	93 Points -70%
Nokia 3.1	319 Points +5%
LG K11	300 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (302 - 305, n=2)	304 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=159, last 2 years)	7743 Points +2439%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	260 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	75 Points -71%
Nokia 3.1	266 Points +2%
LG K11	248 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (253 - 260, n=2)	257 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=159, last 2 years)	11505 Points +4325%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	763 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100	611 Points -20%
Nokia 3.1	1031 Points +35%
LG K11	1121 Points +47%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (763 - 939, n=2)	851 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=159, last 2 years)	4605 Points +504%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	14 fps -26%
Gigaset GS100	8.2 fps -57%
Nokia 3.1	20 fps +5%
LG K11	22 fps +16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (19 - 21, n=2)	20 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=168, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +353%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	7.7 fps -41%
Gigaset GS100	5 fps -62%
Nokia 3.1	13 fps 0%
LG K11	13 fps 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (13 - 14, n=2)	13.5 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=168, last 2 years)	279 fps +2046%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	6 fps -50%
Gigaset GS100	4.4 fps -63%
Nokia 3.1	10 fps -17%
LG K11	11 fps -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (12 - 12, n=2)	12 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=168, last 2 years)	75.3 fps +528%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	6.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	2.8 fps -56%
Nokia 3.1	5.5 fps -13%
LG K11	5.3 fps -16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6.3 - 6.6, n=2)	6.45 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=168, last 2 years)	164.2 fps +2506%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	7.5 fps
Gigaset GS100	2.8 fps -63%
Nokia 3.1	7.8 fps +4%
LG K11	8.6 fps +15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7.5 - 8.5, n=2)	8 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=168, last 2 years)	65.5 fps +773%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	4 fps
Gigaset GS100	1.3 fps -67%
Nokia 3.1	3.6 fps -10%
LG K11	3.5 fps -12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4 - 4.3, n=2)	4.15 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=168, last 2 years)	116.9 fps +2823%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	3.2 fps
Nokia 3.1	4.1 fps +28%
LG K11	4.3 fps +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (3.2 - 3.6, n=2)	3.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=169, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +1394%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	1.9 fps
Nokia 3.1	2 fps +5%
LG K11	1.9 fps 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1.9 - 1.9, n=2)	1.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +3616%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	4.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4.3 - 4.6, n=2)	4.45 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=200, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +1051%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	2.3 (4.3^min) fps
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)	2.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=200, last 2 years)	79.6 fps +3361%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	2.7 fps
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.7 - 2.9, n=2)	2.8 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=200, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +1285%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	0.85 fps
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (0.85 - 0.85, n=2)	0.85 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=200, last 2 years)	31.9 fps +3653%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	61753 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	43861 Points -29%
LG K11	Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	61753 Points 0%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	51633 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	36883 Points -29%
Gigaset GS100	30702 Points -41%
Nokia 3.1	43987 Points -15%
LG K11	39898 Points -23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	51633 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	745 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	774 Points +4%
Gigaset GS100	162 Points -78%
Nokia 3.1	923 Points +24%
LG K11	787 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (745 - 891, n=2)	818 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)	6288 Points +744%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	1434 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	1463 Points +2%
Gigaset GS100	1115 Points -22%
Nokia 3.1	2097 Points +46%
LG K11	1599 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1434 - 1539, n=2)	1487 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)	10177 Points +610%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	607 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	762 Points +26%
Gigaset GS100	431 Points -29%
Nokia 3.1	1033 Points +70%
LG K11	728 Points +20%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (607 - 1151, n=2)	879 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)	6745 Points +1011%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	482 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	444 Points -8%
Gigaset GS100	149 Points -69%
Nokia 3.1	499 Points +4%
LG K11	487 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (472 - 482, n=2)	477 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)	16876 Points +3401%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	733 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A	723 Points -1%
Gigaset GS100	10 Points -99%
Nokia 3.1	671 Points -8%
LG K11	679 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (733 - 756, n=2)	745 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)	1561 Points +113%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A	93 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	93 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +2390%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 3.1 Mediatek MT6750N, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2)	24.6 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	23.55 Points
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)	18.01 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)	17.93 Points -24%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	16.63 Points -29%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	13.38 Points -43%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)	37036 Points +755%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2)	4355 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	4332 Points
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	3397 Points -22%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)	3274 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)	3224 Points -26%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	2093 Points -52%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	15962 ms * -49%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	14150 ms * -32%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)	14116 ms * -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)	13112 ms * -22%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2)	10817 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	10740 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)	1574 ms * +85%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +396%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2)	32 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	30 Points

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	88 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()	88 Points 0%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)	78 Points -11%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	52 Points -41%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi 6A	Xiaomi Redmi 5A	Gigaset GS100	Nokia 3.1	LG K11	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-19%	-49%	-21%	-20%	-17%	688%
Sequential Read 256KB	277.5	293.8 6%	97.2 -65%	281.5 1%	253 -9%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -13%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years) 563%
Sequential Write 256KB	131.7	49.86 -62%	24 -82%	35.26 -73%	48.32 -63%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -24%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years) 983%
Random Read 4KB	33.94	42.32 25%	17.6 -48%	48.62 43%	45.8 35%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) 27%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years) 716%
Random Write 4KB	52.2	9.28 -82%	6.2 -88%	9.2 -82%	13.16 -75%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) -57%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years) 490%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -9%	61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -19%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


31.5 °C	30 °C	31 °C
31 °C	29.6 °C	31.4 °C
30.4 °C	30.1 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C


29.3 °C	31.1 °C	32.3 °C
29.4 °C	30.7 °C	32 °C
29.7 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 32.3 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt
Carga	3.4 / 4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh	Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh	LG K11 3000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-18%	-54%	-8%	-14%	-4%	-53%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	1.2 -71%	1.3 -86%	0.68 3%	0.57 19%	0.68 ?(0.66 - 0.7, n=2) 3%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.5 -25%	2.1 -75%	1.33 -11%	1.48 -23%	1.675 ?(1.2 - 2.15, n=2) -40%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.8 10%	2.9 -45%	1.37 31%	1.54 23%	2.09 ?(2 - 2.18, n=2) -5%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	3.4	2.9 15%	4.4 -29%	4.02 -18%	4.56 -34%	2.94 ?(2.48 - 3.4, n=2) 14%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -90%
Load Maximum *	4	4.8 -20%	5.3 -33%	5.89 -47%	6.16 -54%	3.75 ?(3.49 - 4, n=2) 6%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -145%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		12h 41min

	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh	Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh	LG K11 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	761	1009 33%	532 -30%	562 -26%	741 -3%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema

+ Preço acessível

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Dual SIM e microSD podem ser usados simultaneamente

Contra

- Sem NFC

- Requerimento online estritos

Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 6A. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Redmi 6A, a Xiaomi entrega o smartphone que o Redmi 5A devia ter sido. O desempenho melhorou muito, de modo tal que aplicativos simples, tarefas de navegador, e o sistema podem rodar fluentemente. A câmera é adequado para fotos simples, e os usuários que procuram um segundo telefone acessível, não devem viver sem a função dual-SIM, mesmo se estiverem usando um cartão micro SD.

Com o Redmi 6A, somente a Xiaomi tem um smartphone tão acessível, com esse equipamento, em seu repertório.

Enquanto apenas deve reduzir suas expectativas em termos de desempenho do sistema, o Redmi 6A não possui alguns equipamentos. Por exemplo, devido ao preço acessível, não há um sensor de digitais e os usuários devem viver sem NFC. Os compradores devem estar cientes sobre os estritos requerimentos online da Xiaomi. Sem uma conta se usuário, você não poderá fazer alguns ajustes específicos nas configurações, por exemplo.

Xiaomi Redmi 6A - 11/16/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

77%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 86%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

35 / 60 → 58%

Peso

93%

Bateria

96%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

16 / 63 → 25%

Desempenho da aplicação

46 / 70 → 65%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 73%

Camera

63%

Médio

70%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A

Mike Wobker, 2018-11-19 (Update: 2018-11-24)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison