Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A - Notebookcheck.info
Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A

Next-gen budget smartphone.

Com o Redmi 6A, a Xiaomi apresenta o sucessor do acessível Redmi 5A, mantendo-o com o mesmo preço enquanto melhora o equipamento de forma significante. Avaliamos em nossa análise quais melhorias esperam pelo comprador do smartphone de 90 Euros (~$102; a partir de $90 nos EUA) e como se sai contra a concorrência.
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8320, Análises do: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320
Memória
2048 MB 
, 2GB ou 3GB
Pantalha
5.45 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 16GB ou 32GB, 25 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (de até 256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), UMTS (B1, B8), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 147.5 x 71.5
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo microUSB, SIM tool, MIUI 9.6.2, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.78 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.17 W/kg, fanless
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A

Size Comparison

149.5 mm 71 mm 9.3 mm 174 g148.7 mm 75.3 mm 8.68 mm 162 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g146.25 mm 68.65 mm 8.7 mm 138 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.4 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s +80%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s +79%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.6 MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (52min - 59max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s +88%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s +64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (56min - 61max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s -21%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s -23%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - test chart
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - test chart (detail)
368
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 404 cd/m²
Contraste: 1554:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Gigaset GS100
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Nokia 3.1
IPS, 1440x720, 5.2"
LG K11
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Screen
-38%
-47%
-9%
-66%
Brightness middle
404
503
25%
442
9%
506
25%
394
-2%
Brightness
400
499
25%
446
12%
490
23%
385
-4%
Brightness Distribution
82
84
2%
86
5%
93
13%
93
13%
Black Level *
0.26
0.73
-181%
0.35
-35%
0.24
8%
0.66
-154%
Contrast
1554
689
-56%
1263
-19%
2108
36%
597
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.28
5.44
-27%
8.03
-88%
6.4
-50%
8.2
-92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.97
10.01
-0%
15.81
-59%
11.1
-11%
21.5
-116%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
6.8
-94%
10.4
-197%
7.5
-114%
7.5
-114%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.451 90%
2.02 109%
2.2 100%
2.6 85%
CCT
6899 94%
6590 99%
10070 65%
8643 75%
7581 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
825 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points -17%
Gigaset GS100
579 Points -30%
Nokia 3.1
665 Points -19%
LG K11
609 Points -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()
825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)
5609 Points +580%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2471 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points -24%
Gigaset GS100
1418 Points -43%
Nokia 3.1
2645 Points +7%
LG K11
2259 Points -9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()
2471 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)
15765 Points +538%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1699 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points -22%
Nokia 3.1
1908 Points +12%
LG K11
1559 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ()
1699 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)
12557 Points +639%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3.1 Mediatek MT6750N, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2)
24.6 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
23.55 Points
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
18.01 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.93 Points -24%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
16.63 Points -29%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.38 Points -43%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5AGigaset GS100Nokia 3.1LG K11Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-49%
-21%
-20%
-17%
703%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.5
293.8
6%
97.2
-65%
281.5
1%
253
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
131.7
49.86
-62%
24
-82%
35.26
-73%
48.32
-63%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
33.94
42.32
25%
17.6
-48%
48.62
43%
45.8
35%
Random Write 4KB
52.2
9.28
-82%
6.2
-88%
9.2
-82%
13.16
-75%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-19%
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C30 °C31 °C 
 31 °C29.6 °C31.4 °C 
 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C 
Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
29.3 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C
29.4 °C30.7 °C32 °C
29.7 °C31 °C32 °C
Máximo: 32.3 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.945.52536.544.93137.239.14037.641.25031.7356323.823.78024.425.110023.625.112519.922.716023.32420018.430.725018.238.231515.845.140014.653.450015.557.26301361.580012.364.7100012.166.1125011.965.8160010.768.2200010.768.1250010.566.6315010.366.8400010.767.2500010.565.5630010.565800010.663.21000010.662.51250010.553.71600010.641.4SPL61.552.561.424.177.8N14.68.214.50.639.8median 12.1median 61.5median 37.9median 12.3median 58.8Delta5.313.823.511.8192727.825.927.629.532.231.428.732.634.224.123.223.122.724.123.117.21916.623.616.833.216.438.714.147.513.85713.662.712.163.311.564.211.566.911.265.511.263.511.264.711.26511.166.211.266.111.266.711.465.211.466.811.360.811.450.311.441.86023.977.113.70.539.7median 11.5median 62.7median 58.43.614.218.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.4 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-54%
-8%
-14%
-4%
-54%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.2
-71%
1.3
-86%
0.68
3%
0.57
19%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.1
-75%
1.33
-11%
1.48
-23%
1.675 ?(1.2 - 2.15, n=2)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.8
10%
2.9
-45%
1.37
31%
1.54
23%
2.09 ?(2 - 2.18, n=2)
-5%
Load Average *
3.4
2.9
15%
4.4
-29%
4.02
-18%
4.56
-34%
2.94 ?(2.48 - 3.4, n=2)
14%
Load Maximum *
4
4.8
-20%
5.3
-33%
5.89
-47%
6.16
-54%
3.75 ?(3.49 - 4, n=2)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
12h 41min
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
761
1009
33%
532
-30%
562
-26%
741
-3%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Preço acessível
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Dual SIM e microSD podem ser usados simultaneamente

Contra

- Sem NFC
- Requerimento online estritos
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 6A. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 6A. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Redmi 6A, a Xiaomi entrega o smartphone que o Redmi 5A devia ter sido. O desempenho melhorou muito, de modo tal que aplicativos simples, tarefas de navegador, e o sistema podem rodar fluentemente. A câmera é adequado para fotos simples, e os usuários que procuram um segundo telefone acessível, não devem viver sem a função dual-SIM, mesmo se estiverem usando um cartão micro SD.

Com o Redmi 6A, somente a Xiaomi tem um smartphone tão acessível, com esse equipamento, em seu repertório.

Enquanto apenas deve reduzir suas expectativas em termos de desempenho do sistema, o Redmi 6A não possui alguns equipamentos. Por exemplo, devido ao preço acessível, não há um sensor de digitais e os usuários devem viver sem NFC. Os compradores devem estar cientes sobre os estritos requerimentos online da Xiaomi. Sem uma conta se usuário, você não poderá fazer alguns ajustes específicos nas configurações, por exemplo.

Xiaomi Redmi 6A - 11/16/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
77%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 58%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
63%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-19 (Update: 2018-11-24)