Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Nokia 3.1 | |
Gigaset GS100 | |
LG K11 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Nokia 3.1 | |
Gigaset GS100 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
LG K11 |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 404 cd/m²
Contraste: 1554:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS100 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Nokia 3.1 IPS, 1440x720, 5.2" | LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -38% | -47% | -9% | -66% | |
Brightness middle | 404 | 503 25% | 442 9% | 506 25% | 394 -2% |
Brightness | 400 | 499 25% | 446 12% | 490 23% | 385 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 84 2% | 86 5% | 93 13% | 93 13% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.73 -181% | 0.35 -35% | 0.24 8% | 0.66 -154% |
Contrast | 1554 | 689 -56% | 1263 -19% | 2108 36% | 597 -62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 5.44 -27% | 8.03 -88% | 6.4 -50% | 8.2 -92% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.97 | 10.01 -0% | 15.81 -59% | 11.1 -11% | 21.5 -116% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 6.8 -94% | 10.4 -197% | 7.5 -114% | 7.5 -114% |
Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.451 90% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% | 2.6 85% |
CCT | 6899 94% | 6590 99% | 10070 65% | 8643 75% | 7581 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Gigaset GS100 | |
Nokia 3.1 | |
LG K11 | |
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Gigaset GS100 | |
Nokia 3.1 | |
LG K11 | |
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Nokia 3.1 | |
LG K11 | |
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M () | |
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.6 - 25.7, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70) | |
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 6A | Xiaomi Redmi 5A | Gigaset GS100 | Nokia 3.1 | LG K11 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | -49% | -21% | -20% | -17% | 703% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 277.5 | 293.8 6% | 97.2 -65% | 281.5 1% | 253 -9% | 242 ? -13% | 1887 ? 580% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 131.7 | 49.86 -62% | 24 -82% | 35.26 -73% | 48.32 -63% | 100.5 ? -24% | 1471 ? 1017% |
Random Read 4KB | 33.94 | 42.32 25% | 17.6 -48% | 48.62 43% | 45.8 35% | 43.2 ? 27% | 278 ? 719% |
Random Write 4KB | 52.2 | 9.28 -82% | 6.2 -88% | 9.2 -82% | 13.16 -75% | 22.4 ? -57% | 311 ? 496% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.8 ? | 84.9 ? 3% | 79.5 ? -4% | 77.2 ? -7% | 82.8 ? 0% | 71.8 ? -13% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.7 ? | 62.6 ? -5% | 61 ? -7% | 59.8 ? -9% | 61.1 ? -7% | 52.9 ? -19% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt |
Carga |
3.4 / 4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | -54% | -8% | -14% | -4% | -54% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 1.2 -71% | 1.3 -86% | 0.68 3% | 0.57 19% | 0.68 ? 3% | 0.882 ? -26% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.5 -25% | 2.1 -75% | 1.33 -11% | 1.48 -23% | 1.675 ? -40% | 1.448 ? -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 2.9 -45% | 1.37 31% | 1.54 23% | 2.09 ? -5% | 1.603 ? 20% |
Load Average * | 3.4 | 2.9 15% | 4.4 -29% | 4.02 -18% | 4.56 -34% | 2.94 ? 14% | 6.57 ? -93% |
Load Maximum * | 4 | 4.8 -20% | 5.3 -33% | 5.89 -47% | 6.16 -54% | 3.75 ? 6% | 9.92 ? -148% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh | Nokia 3.1 2990 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 761 | 1009 33% | 532 -30% | 562 -26% | 741 -3% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Redmi 6A, a Xiaomi entrega o smartphone que o Redmi 5A devia ter sido. O desempenho melhorou muito, de modo tal que aplicativos simples, tarefas de navegador, e o sistema podem rodar fluentemente. A câmera é adequado para fotos simples, e os usuários que procuram um segundo telefone acessível, não devem viver sem a função dual-SIM, mesmo se estiverem usando um cartão micro SD.
Com o Redmi 6A, somente a Xiaomi tem um smartphone tão acessível, com esse equipamento, em seu repertório.
Enquanto apenas deve reduzir suas expectativas em termos de desempenho do sistema, o Redmi 6A não possui alguns equipamentos. Por exemplo, devido ao preço acessível, não há um sensor de digitais e os usuários devem viver sem NFC. Os compradores devem estar cientes sobre os estritos requerimentos online da Xiaomi. Sem uma conta se usuário, você não poderá fazer alguns ajustes específicos nas configurações, por exemplo.
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
- 11/16/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker