Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| LG K11 | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.281
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | HTC Desire 12 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Wiko View Max IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Motorola Moto G5s Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -9% | -28% | -12% | 16% | -45% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 418 -25% | 515 -7% | 392 -29% | 512 -8% | 394 -29% | 549 -1% |
| Brightness | 538 | 414 -23% | 498 -7% | 403 -25% | 500 -7% | 385 -28% | 541 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 90 -1% | 85 -7% | 90 -1% | 93 2% | 95 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.7 -15% | 0.48 21% | 0.61 -0% | 0.35 43% | 0.66 -8% | 0.42 31% |
| Contrast | 908 | 597 -34% | 1073 18% | 643 -29% | 1463 61% | 597 -34% | 1307 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.86 | 4.2 14% | 7.8 -60% | 5.4 -11% | 4.6 5% | 8.2 -69% | 6.08 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.46 | 8.3 2% | 15.87 -88% | 9.7 -15% | 7.6 10% | 21.5 -154% | 10.69 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.7 11% | 10.6 -100% | 4.2 21% | 3.8 28% | 7.5 -42% | 6.6 -25% |
| Gamma | 2.281 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.246 98% | 2.59 85% | 2.11 104% | 2.6 85% | 2.305 95% |
| CCT | 7770 84% | 7394 88% | 9715 67% | 6734 97% | 6952 93% | 7581 86% | 8399 77% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2404 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus | |
| Wiko View Max | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus | |
| LG K11 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View Max (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View Max (Chrome 67) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Wiko View Max (Chrome 67) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68) | |
| Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro | HTC Desire 12 Plus | Wiko View Max | Honor 7C | Motorola Moto G5s Plus | LG K11 | Xiaomi Black Shark | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -23% | -36% | -30% | -28% | -34% | 77% | -17% | 453% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 278.7 | 252.8 -9% | 229.4 -18% | 297 7% | 237.4 -15% | 253 -9% | 742 166% | 274 ? -2% | 1887 ? 577% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 212.9 | 135.6 -36% | 96.9 -54% | 115 -46% | 75.7 -64% | 48.32 -77% | 199.6 -6% | 176.6 ? -17% | 1471 ? 591% |
| Random Read 4KB | 66.9 | 65.7 -2% | 31.65 -53% | 30 -55% | 37.94 -43% | 45.8 -32% | 127.2 90% | 59.4 ? -11% | 278 ? 316% |
| Random Write 4KB | 72.6 | 9.16 -87% | 11.87 -84% | 10 -86% | 44.89 -38% | 13.16 -82% | 114.1 57% | 32.2 ? -56% | 311 ? 328% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.5 ? | 83.4 ? 0% | 80.8 ? -3% | 83.9 ? 0% | 79.6 ? -5% | 82.8 ? -1% | 77.4 ? -7% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.2 ? | 59.9 ? -4% | 60.4 ? -3% | 62.6 ? 1% | 58.8 ? -5% | 61.1 ? -2% | 58.3 ? -6% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 7C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.3 / 2.1 / 3.7 Watt |
| Carga |
4.5 / 6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh | Wiko View Max 4000 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 30% | -66% | 33% | 28% | 28% | 6% | 20% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 0.68 48% | 2.8 -115% | 0.6 54% | 0.83 36% | 0.57 56% | 0.8 38% | 0.981 ? 25% | 0.88 ? 32% |
| Idle Average * | 2.1 | 2.05 2% | 3.5 -67% | 2.16 -3% | 1.67 20% | 1.48 30% | 1.5 29% | 1.985 ? 5% | 1.444 ? 31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.7 | 2.12 43% | 6.3 -70% | 2.24 39% | 1.85 50% | 1.54 58% | 2.3 38% | 2.27 ? 39% | 1.6 ? 57% |
| Load Average * | 4.5 | 3 33% | 7 -56% | 2.59 42% | 3.47 23% | 4.56 -1% | 4.8 -7% | 3.51 ? 22% | 6.57 ? -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 6 | 4.57 24% | 7.4 -23% | 4.11 31% | 5.41 10% | 6.16 -3% | 10.1 -68% | 5.38 ? 10% | 9.91 ? -65% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh | Wiko View Max 4000 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -37% | 22% | -20% | 13% | -15% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1765 | 1496 -15% | 1753 -1% | ||||
| H.264 | 1214 | 747 -38% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 868 | 545 -37% | 1056 22% | 693 -20% | 974 12% | 741 -15% | 711 -18% |
| Load | 293 | 419 43% | 253 -14% |
Pro
Contra
O Redmi 6 Pro é um smartphone bastante bem feito, pertencente à gama média de baixo preço. O lançamento do Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, no mínimo, introduzirá um novo concorrente sério para a competição local de smartphones na faixa de preço abaixo de 200 Euros (~$227).
O Redmi 6 Pro oferece muito por um preço baixo - no entanto, só podemos dar uma recomendação clara de compra na Alemanha para a versão Android One.
O smartphone Xiaomi tem uma boa tela IPS brilhante com ângulos de visão muito estáveis. Além disso, possui uma câmera atraente, armazenamento eMMC rápido, bateria de longa duração, uma bandeja tripla para dual SIM e recursos de desbloqueio biométrico que funcionam extremamente bem. Além disso, o desempenho do sistema, bem como a aparência externa e a sensação da superfície da carcaça, não revelam o fato de que este smartphone custa apenas 180 Euros (~$205).
No atento, a qualidade do alto-falante mono na parte inferior do dispositivo não foi muito convincente. A Xiaomi também poderia ter instalado um processador mais atualizado em seu modelo 2018. O uso local é dificultado pela baixa quantidade de bandas LTE suportadas na versão chinesa.
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
- 10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
