Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5A
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 503 cd/m²
Contraste: 689:1 (Preto: 0.73 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.451
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 33% | 37% | 7% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 503 | 417 -17% | 594 18% | 527 5% | 483 -4% |
| Brightness | 499 | 395 -21% | 570 14% | 503 1% | 460 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 88 5% | 86 2% | 91 8% | 88 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.73 | 0.18 75% | 0.22 70% | 0.68 7% | 0.4 45% |
| Contrast | 689 | 2317 236% | 2700 292% | 775 12% | 1208 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.44 | 6.46 -19% | 6.63 -22% | 5.3 3% | 5.8 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.01 | 10.72 -7% | 13.99 -40% | 9.2 8% | 12.6 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 5.8 15% | 9.2 -35% | 5.8 15% | 5 26% |
| Gamma | 2.451 90% | 2.423 91% | 2.24 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.6 85% |
| CCT | 6590 99% | 7839 83% | 8663 75% | 7894 82% | 7709 84% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=10) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3681 - 5253, n=17) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3831, n=18) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 11, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Nokia 2 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 3, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | Honor 7A | Umidigi A1 Pro | Nokia 2 | Huawei Y6 2018 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -8% | -22% | 2% | -31% | 1800% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 293.8 | 254.8 -13% | 269.2 -8% | 131.1 -55% | 254.3 -13% | 164.5 ? -44% | 1887 ? 542% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 49.86 | 72.5 45% | 44.4 -11% | 50.8 2% | 65.6 32% | 43 ? -14% | 1471 ? 2850% |
| Random Read 4KB | 42.32 | 39.2 -7% | 29.6 -30% | 17.44 -59% | 38.8 -8% | 21.7 ? -49% | 278 ? 557% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.28 | 9.4 1% | 10.2 10% | 8.1 -13% | 9 -3% | 8.08 ? -13% | 311 ? 3251% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 84.9 ? 0% | 81 ? -5% | 81.9 ? -4% | 84.9 ? 0% | 59.1 ? -30% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.6 ? | 65.4 ? 4% | 58.8 ? -6% | 61.2 ? -2% | 64 ? 2% | 39.8 ? -36% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 7A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.2 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Carga |
2.9 / 4.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -54% | 12% | -62% | -29% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 1.3 -8% | 1.8 -50% | 0.55 54% | 1.7 -42% | 1.113 ? 7% | 0.88 ? 27% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.6 -7% | 2.3 -53% | 1.02 32% | 2.5 -67% | 2.19 ? -46% | 1.444 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 2.9 -61% | 3.2 -78% | 1.09 39% | 3.2 -78% | 2.55 ? -42% | 1.6 ? 11% |
| Load Average * | 2.9 | 3.7 -28% | 4.7 -62% | 4.48 -54% | 5.2 -79% | 4.32 ? -49% | 6.57 ? -127% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.8 | 6.4 -33% | 6 -25% | 5.32 -11% | 6.8 -42% | 5.5 ? -15% | 9.91 ? -106% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Nokia 2 4100 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1009 | 657 -35% | 608 -40% | 840 -17% | 643 -36% |
Pro
Contra
O Xiaomi Redmi 5A é um dispositivo compacto com uma relação preço-desempenho imbatível. No entanto, ele só pode ser recomendado para aqueles que não precisam de muito poder e que irão usá-lo principalmente para tirar fotos ocasionais ou enviar mensagens via WhatsApp. Dito isto, o Redmi 5A fornece desempenho suficiente para o bom funcionamento do sistema operacional (Android 7.1).
Além das vantagens que o smartphone compacto oferece, existem também algumas desvantagens que acompanham o Redmi 5A. A relação de contraste e o valor de preto da tela são dificilmente toleráveis e os reflexos fazem com que a leitura do conteúdo da tela seja difícil em exteriores.
O Xiaomi Redmi 5A é um smartphone sólido que é muito fácil de manusear. Com seu preço de menos de 100 euros ($116), oferece a melhor relação preço-desempenho nesta faixa de preço.
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
- 07/16/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
