Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 613 cd/m²
Contraste: 1088:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Maze Alpha X IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Ulefone Power 3 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Gigaset GS370 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -93% | -4% | 1% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 620 | 497 -20% | 494 -20% | 627 1% | 472 -24% |
| Brightness | 612 | 478 -22% | 485 -21% | 622 2% | 468 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 87 -9% | 87 -9% | 82 -15% | 92 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.6 -5% | 0.33 42% | 0.41 28% | 0.73 -28% |
| Contrast | 1088 | 828 -24% | 1497 38% | 1529 41% | 647 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 11.6 -235% | 5.1 -47% | 4.5 -30% | 6.8 -97% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.88 | 22.1 -180% | 9.9 -26% | 7 11% | 14.5 -84% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 13.5 -246% | 3.5 10% | 5.1 -31% | 8.2 -110% |
| Gamma | 2.073 106% | 2.93 75% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7230 90% | 9955 65% | 7253 90% | 7201 90% | 7924 82% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | Maze Alpha X | Ulefone Power 3 | Honor 9 Lite | Gigaset GS370 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | 36% | 136% | 15% | 52% | 1446% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270 | 247.4 -8% | 294.6 9% | 269.6 0% | 284.9 6% | 274 ? 1% | 1887 ? 599% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 194.5 | 162.2 -17% | 214.9 10% | 138.2 -29% | 182.4 -6% | 176.6 ? -9% | 1471 ? 656% |
| Random Read 4KB | 79.5 | 70.3 -12% | 61.4 -23% | 68.4 -14% | 48.4 -39% | 59.4 ? -25% | 278 ? 250% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.1 | 11.61 64% | 21.25 199% | 66.8 841% | 17.1 141% | 32.2 ? 354% | 311 ? 4280% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.4 | 81 ? -4% | 81.8 ? -3% | 83.1 ? -2% | 76.5 ? -9% | 77.4 ? -8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.5 | 74 ? 24% | 71.9 ? 21% | 71.9 ? 21% | 56.1 ? -6% | 58.3 ? -2% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
| minimal | 54 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.7 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt |
| Carga |
4.2 / 7.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS370 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 31% | 21% | 24% | 13% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.9 -29% | 0.79 -13% | 0.85 -21% | 0.77 -10% | 0.981 ? -40% | 0.882 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 2.8 | 2.14 24% | 1.82 35% | 2 29% | 1.58 44% | 1.985 ? 29% | 1.448 ? 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.4 | 2.18 36% | 1.87 45% | 2.04 40% | 1.73 49% | 2.27 ? 33% | 1.603 ? 53% |
| Load Average * | 4.2 | 3.96 6% | 2.7 36% | 3.23 23% | 3.59 15% | 3.51 ? 16% | 6.57 ? -56% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 5.81 19% | 3.62 50% | 4.93 32% | 5.69 21% | 5.38 ? 25% | 9.92 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS370 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 21% | 177% | 21% | -2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 497 | 603 21% | 1376 177% | 601 21% | 487 -2% |
| Reader / Idle | 1624 | 965 | |||
| Load | 240 | 253 | |||
| H.264 | 622 |
Pro
Contra
O Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus oferece um moderno formato de tela 18:9 com marcos pequenos, uma boa qualidade de voz, um ótimo alto-falante, uma carcaça de alta qualidade e valores decentes de desempenho.
No entanto, você não deve esperar muito da câmera e da duração da bateria. Para usuários tecnicamente menos versados, também é difícil descobrir que o modo de economia de energia integrado bloqueia as funções do GPS em alguns aplicativos. Quem navega muito na Internet pode não estar satisfeito com o Redmi 5 Plus, e há dispositivos consideravelmente mais rápidos para isso.
Apesar de suas arestas em alguns recursos, o Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus é um bom negócio.
Então você deve comprar este smartphone da Xiaomi? Diríamos que sim. Se você pode viver com as fraquezas que mencionamos, o smartphone oferece uma boa relação custo-benefício. Enquanto isso não é tão bom no papel como em alguns de seus predecessores, muitas coisas, como a garantia, funcionam melhor agora.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
- 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
