Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - Telefone de gama média com uma tela HDR AMOLED e >1000 nits

Name: Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Ainda é um assassino de carros-chefes?

O telefone Poco deste ano mais uma vez oferece especificações de hardware muito competitivas, incluindo a tela AMOLED muito brilhante e com cores precisas, por um preço barato. Medimos um brilho acima de 1080 nits no telefone de gama média. Nossa análise mostrará se o smartphone 5G barato vale o preço pedido de 440 Euros (~US$ 516).

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Poco F Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, ou 256 GB UFS 3.1, 107 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola digital, sensor hall effect, barômetro, sensor de flickering, USB-C, emissor IV, IP 58, Miracast, status LED

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: Sub6G: n77/n78; 4G: FDD-LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28, TDD-LTE 38/40/41; 3G: WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8, EVDO BC0; 2G: GSM B2/B3/B5/B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 163.3 x 75.4

Bateria

4700 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.9, 26 mm, 1/1.72", 0.8 µm) + 13 MP (f/2.4, 123˚, 1.12µm) + 5 MP (f/2.2, 50mm) + 2 MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm, pop-up

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Onscreen, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, ferramenta SIM, guia do usuário, cartão de garantia, MiUI for Poco (MiUI 11), 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, SAR: 0.79 W/kg (head), 1.03 W/kg (body), fanless

peso

219 g, Suprimento de energia: 86 g

Preço

500 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	219 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
85 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	LG Velvet SD 765G, Adreno 620	180 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.80"	2460x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.44"	2400x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	06/2022	Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650	218 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.65"	2340x1080
85.3 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 SD 865, Adreno 650	222 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	926 (463^min - 960^max) MBit/s +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	923 (783^min - 956^max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	859 (755^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	849 (414^min - 930^max) MBit/s -1%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	618 (310^min - 644^max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	946 (911^min - 960^max) MBit/s +23%
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	914 (888^min - 928^max) MBit/s +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s +17%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	770 (741^min - 794^max) MBit/s
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	683 (656^min - 691^max) MBit/s -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	679 (601^min - 733^max) MBit/s -12%

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø769 (741-794)

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø859 (755-907)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera LowLight Ultraweitwinkel Hauptkamera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


805 cd/m²	787 cd/m²	799 cd/m²
801 cd/m²	799 cd/m²	791 cd/m²
813 cd/m²	804 cd/m²	806 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 813 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 800.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.22 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 799 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.237

	Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	LG Velvet P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.8"	Realme X50 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		-41%	-52%	13%	-188%	-57%
Brightness middle	799	586 -27%	679 -15%	786 -2%	593 -26%	619 -23%
Brightness	801	587 -27%	690 -14%	791 -1%	601 -25%	616 -23%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	97 0%	96 -1%	92 -5%	90 -7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.46	2.8 -92%	3.2 -119%	1.1 25%	8.1 -455%	3.74 -156%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.92	6.3 -116%	6.2 -112%	2.2 25%	16.2 -455%	7.94 -172%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	2.3 15%	4.1 -52%	1.8 33%	7.1 -163%	1.7 37%
Gamma	2.237 ^98%	2.01 ^109%	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	2.188 ^101%
CCT	6003 ^108%	6827 ^95%	6604 ^98%	6315 ^103%	7566 ^86%	6662 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

177.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 177.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 177.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	923 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	554 Points -40%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	915 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	924 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points +12%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3399 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1797 Points -47%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3087 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3076 Points -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3449 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points +2%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3067 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2829 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2954 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3259 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2549 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2487 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3059 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1187 Points -61%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3382 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2634 - 4737, n=15)	3203 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 21892, n=47, last 2 years)	8171 Points +167%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	4284 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4304 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4276 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4261 - 4304, n=5)	4281 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +31%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	13569 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13589 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13356 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (13186 - 13589, n=5)	13396 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +16%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	9548 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9576 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9739 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9443 - 9739, n=5)	9559 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +32%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	12129 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	9154 Points -25%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	19711 Points +63%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13954 Points +15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12612 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points +12%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	10347 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7808 Points -25%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13202 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12879 Points +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9822 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points +9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	76099 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	43325 Points -43%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	83917 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	73143 Points -4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	112989 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20)	84555 Points +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	146854 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	68764 Points -53%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	145603 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	150654 Points +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	154375 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20)	147707 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	28985 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18769 Points -35%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	33793 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	26182 Points -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	58293 Points +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20)	35224 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8215 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3576 Points -56%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8947 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8581 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9492 Points +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9138 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	11569 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5005 Points -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11533 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12234 Points +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12494 Points +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11557 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3965 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1689 Points -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5034 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4196 Points +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5049 Points +27%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5274 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8652 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3678 Points -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9910 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8499 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9877 Points +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10090 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	12547 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5437 Points -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12895 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12601 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12750 Points +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12843 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3956 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1790 Points -55%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5478 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3973 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5532 Points +40%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5765 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	7265 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3278 Points -55%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7293 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7190 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7305 Points +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7323 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8365 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3289 Points -61%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8345 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8371 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8432 Points +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8284 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	4958 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3312 Points -33%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5068 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4813 Points -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5209 Points +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5209 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8145 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2934 Points -64%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7957 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8154 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8105 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	9466 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3547 Points -63%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9567 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9389 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9467 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9157 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5466 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1898 Points -65%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5523 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5187 Points -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5532 Points +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5780 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	6106 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2877 Points -53%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6644 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6182 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6590 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8265 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3193 Points -61%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8263 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8175 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8321 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3193 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2145 Points -33%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3947 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3336 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3793 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	60 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps 0%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps +50%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	90 fps +50%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	205 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	96 fps -53%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	204 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	206 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +44%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	60 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	47 fps -22%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +47%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +47%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	125 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps -56%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	124 fps -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	120 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +40%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	59 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	32 fps -46%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps +27%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +13%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	88 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	37 fps -58%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	74 fps -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	82 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +41%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	44 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps -59%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	42 fps -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	41 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +13%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	51 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps -59%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	49 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +47%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	46 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20 fps -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps -4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	54 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	23 fps -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	52 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +57%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	29 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	12 fps -59%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28 fps -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +34%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	20 fps
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps -57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +70%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	569967 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	308878 Points -46%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	593933 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	607937 Points +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	574589 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	6273 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3674 Points -41%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6205 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points -8%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6149 Points -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5264 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +4%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	10075 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6430 Points -36%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10147 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9723 Points -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8421 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +3%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8874 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4556 Points -49%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points -16%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8398 Points -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5564 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points -20%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	11736 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5153 Points -56%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11688 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11648 Points -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11747 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +53%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	1456 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1226 Points -16%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1576 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points -12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1505 Points +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1395 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +8%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +84%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	69.5 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	67.7 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	66.3 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	61.5 Points -9%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	51 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points -25%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	119.9 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	117.4 Points -2%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	116.7 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	109.2 Points -9%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	103.4 Points -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +93%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	74.5 runs/min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83)	70.9 runs/min -5%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.3 runs/min -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min -14%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	59.6 runs/min -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min -25%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	49.8 runs/min -33%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	104 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	103 Points
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	102 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	99 Points -4%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	76 Points -26%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +58%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	24369 Points
Realme X50 Pro	23768 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points -10%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	21048 Points -14%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	18546 Points -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	15901 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	2666 ms * -34%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	2411 ms * -21%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	2401 ms * -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms * -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * -2%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	2000 ms * -0%
Realme X50 Pro	0 ms * +100%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)	1993 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro	LG Velvet	Realme X50 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 10	Nubia RedMagic 5G	Xiaomi Black Shark 3	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-40%	6%	-7%	-18%	1%	4%	44%
Sequential Read 256KB	1634	925 -43%	1756 7%	1498 -8%	1654 1%	1692 4%	1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60) -2%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 15%
Sequential Write 256KB	722	409.2 -43%	756 5%	680 -6%	388.4 -46%	680 -6%	748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60) 4%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 104%
Random Read 4KB	229.7	154.3 -33%	229.4 0%	207 -10%	201.6 -12%	238.3 4%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60) 6%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 21%
Random Write 4KB	226.4	135.9 -40%	252 11%	215.9 -5%	193.6 -14%	227.8 1%	244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60) 8%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 37%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.3 °C	41.6 °C	38.5 °C
41.6 °C	41.3 °C	38.5 °C
41.8 °C	41.1 °C	38.7 °C

Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C


36 °C	39.4 °C	40.1 °C
36.2 °C	39.5 °C	38.8 °C
36 °C	39.2 °C	39.5 °C

Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Realme X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	2 / 3.1 / 4 Watt
Carga	6.4 / 11.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro 4700 mAh	LG Velvet 4300 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		55%	40%	50%	38%	24%	29%	36%
Idle Minimum *	2	0.66 67%	1 50%	0.53 73%	1.1 45%	1.2 40%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) 43%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 56%
Idle Average *	3.1	1.58 49%	1.77 43%	1.46 53%	1.5 52%	2.1 32%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) 28%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 53%
Idle Maximum *	4	1.6 60%	1.86 53%	1.52 62%	1.71 57%	2.5 37%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) 39%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 59%
Load Average *	6.4	3.3 48%	4.23 34%	3.83 40%	4.84 24%	6.3 2%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) 18%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -2%
Load Maximum *	11.6	5.46 53%	9.13 21%	8.89 23%	10.42 10%	10.7 8%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) 17%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) 15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		32h 34min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		24h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 46min

	Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro 4700 mAh	LG Velvet 4300 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh
Battery Runtime		-20%	-25%	-20%	-41%	-29%
Reader / Idle	1954		1507 -23%	1789 -8%		1487 -24%
H.264	1466		1029 -30%	1126 -23%		899 -39%
WiFi v1.3	923	741 -20%	775 -16%	662 -28%	614 -33%	703 -24%
Load	286		194 -32%	226 -21%	149 -48%	206 -28%

Pro

+ Design e qualidade de construção

+ Desempenho

+ Boas durações

+ Painel OLED muito brilhante

+ Bom alto falante...

Contra

- ...que suporta apenas saída mono

- O painel se limita a 60 Hz

- Temperaturas relativamente altas

- Sem lente teleobjetiva

- Lente grande angular fraca

Veredicto do Poco F2 Pro - Excelente Smartphone de 60-Hz

In review: Poco F2 Pro. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Poco F2 Pro, a Xiaomi conseguiu mais uma vez lançar um smartphone de gama média bem completo. Embora o modelo deste ano não seja tão barato quanto o Pocophone F1, o preço demandado de cerca de 430 Euros (~US$ 505) para o modelo de 128 GB ainda o torna uma oferta interessante - isso é ainda mais reforçado pelo fato de a versão de 256 GB estar frequentemente à venda por 450 Euros (~US$ 530) durante nossa análise.

O Poco F2 Pro oferece um painel OLED muito brilhante e bem calibrado, bateria de longa duração e um design moderno sem um entalhe ou um furo para interromper a tela. Além disso, a qualidade da construção é alta e o desempenho atinge quase, mas não exatamente, níveis de carros-chefes graças ao Snapdragon 865 e armazenamento UFS 3.1.

Quem não precisar de 90 Hz e uma boa configuração da câmera descobrirá que o Poco F2 Pro tem muito a oferecer por um preço relativamente barato.

Infelizmente, a Xiaomi equipou o seu mais recente modelo de telefone Poco com um painel de apenas 60 Hz que exibe animações e rolagem menos fluida do que seus concorrentes internos Black Shark 3 ou Xiaomi Mi 10. Da mesma forma, o F2 Poco vem apenas com um único alto-falante integrado que produz uma experiência de áudio muito convincente. Comparado aos concorrentes de gama alta, também serão necessários compromissos no que diz respeito à qualidade da câmera. Devido à falta de uma lente telefoto e à qualidade bastante ruim da lente ultra grande angular, o telefone Poco parece muito menos flexível do que os telefones Android carros-chefes com câmera.

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

49 / 70 → 71%

Peso

88%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

92%

Desempenho do jogos

61 / 64 → 95%

Desempenho da aplicação

82 / 86 → 96%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

70%

Médio

80%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - Telefone de gama média com uma tela HDR AMOLED e >1000 nits

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 2)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro audio analysis

Realme X50 Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto do Poco F2 Pro - Excelente Smartphone de 60-Hz

More articles related to this device

Price comparison